Marketing Letters

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 115–129 | Cite as

Perceiving competitive reactions: The value of accuracy (and paranoia)

  • Bruce H. Clark
  • David B. Montgomery


An assumption of much of the literature in marketing strategy is that a firm accurately knows the nature of its interaction with competitors. This study examines this assumption and explores the relationship between firm performance and accuracy in perception. Teams in the Markstrat2 simulation game reported their reactions to competitors, while simultaneously indicating their perceptions of whether competitors had reacted to their decisions in the past. Teams were in general inaccurate in identifying competitive reactions. Further, missing a competitive reaction (not perceiving a competitor's stated reaction) significantly reduced a team's performance. The data suggest that teams may benefit from being paranoid about their competitors; late in the game, the more competitive reactions a team perceived to its moves, the better the firm performed, regardless of accuracy.

Key words

competition decision making strategy perception accuracy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aaker, David A. (1995). Strategic Market Management (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Amit, Raphael, Ian Domowitz, and Chaim Fershtman. (1988). “Thinking One Step Ahead: The Use of Conjectures in Competitor Analysis.” Strategic Management Journal 9, 431–442.Google Scholar
  3. Bloomberg Business News. (1995). “Company Spotlight: Hewlett-Packard Soars on ‘Paranoi’” (May 15), 1–3.Google Scholar
  4. Bowman, Douglas and Hubert Gatignon. (1995). “Determinants of Competitor Response Time to a New Product Introduction.” Journal of Marketing Research 32 (February), 42–53.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, Jacob. (1988). Statistical Power Analyses for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Deshpande, Rohit, John U. Farley, and Frederick E. WebsterJr. (1993). “Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis.” Journal of Marketing 57(1), 23–37.Google Scholar
  7. Deshpande, Rohit, and Hubert Gatignon. (1994). “Competitive Analysis.” Marketing Letters 5(3), 271–287.Google Scholar
  8. Funder, David C. (1987). “Errors and Mistakes: Evaluating the Accuracy of Social Judgment.” Psychological Bulletin 101(1), 75–90.Google Scholar
  9. Gatignon, Hubert, Erin Anderson and Kristiaan Helsen. (1989). “Competive Reactions to Market Entry: Explaining Interfirm Differences.” Journal of Marketing Research 26 (February), 44–55.Google Scholar
  10. Glazer, Rashi, Joel H. Steckel, and Russell S. Winer. (1987). “Group Process and Decision Performance in a Simulated Marketing Environment.” Journal of Business Research 15, 545–557.Google Scholar
  11. Glazer, Rashi, Joel H. Steckel, and Russell S. Winer. (1992). “Locally Rational Decision Making: The Distracting Effect of Information on Managerial Performance.” Management Science 38 (February), 212–226.Google Scholar
  12. Glazer, Rashi, and Allen M. Weiss. (1993). “Marketing in Turbulent Environments: Decision Processes and the Time-Sensitivity of Information.” Journal of Marketing Research 30(4), 509–521.Google Scholar
  13. Hannan, Michael T., and John H. Freeman. (1984). “Structural Inertia and Organizational Change.” American Sociological Review 49, 149–164.Google Scholar
  14. Kalbfleisch, Pamela J. (1992). “Deceit, Distrust and the Social Milieu: Application of Deception Research in a Troubled World.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 20, 308–334.Google Scholar
  15. Kmenta, Jan. (1986). Elements of Econometrics (2nd ed.) New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Lant, Teresa K., Frances J. Milliken, and Bipin Batra. (1992). “The Role of Managerial Learning and Interpretation in Strategic Persistence and Reorientation: An Empirical Exploration.” Strategic Management Journal 13(8), 585–608.Google Scholar
  17. Lant, Teresa K., and David B. Montgomery. (1987). “Learning from Strategic Success and Failure.” Journal of Business Research 15, 503–517.Google Scholar
  18. Larreche, Jean-Claude, and Hubert Gatignon (1990). Markstrat2: A Marketing Strategy Simulation. Redwood City, CA: Scientific Press.Google Scholar
  19. Levine, Gustav, and Stanley Parkinson. (1994). Experimental Methods in Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Macmillan, Neil A., and C. Douglas Creelman. (1991). Detection Theory: A User's Guide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, Danny and Ming-Jer Chen. (1994). “Sources and Consequences of Competitive Inertia: A Study of the U.S. Airline Industry.” Administrative Science Quarterly 39 (March), 1–23.Google Scholar
  22. Miller, Danny, and Peter H. Friesen. (1980). “Momentum and Revolution in Organizational Adaptation.” Academy of Management Journal 24, 591–614.Google Scholar
  23. Moore, Marian Chapman. (1990). “Signaling and Screening: Tactics in Negotiations Across Organizations.” Research on Negotiation in Organizations 2, 77–93.Google Scholar
  24. Moore, Marian Chapman. (1992). “Signals and Choices in a Competitive Interaction: The Role of Moves and Messages.” Management Science 38(4), 483–500.Google Scholar
  25. Perrault, William D., and Lawrence E. Leigh. (1989). “Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments.” Journal of Marketing Research 26 (May), 135–148.Google Scholar
  26. Porter, Michael E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Robinson, William T. (1988). “Marketing Mix Reactions to Entry.” Marketing Science 7 (Fall), 368–385.Google Scholar
  28. Ross, William T. (1987). “A Re-examination of the Results of Hogarth and Makridakis, ‘The Value of Decision Making in a Complex Environment: An Experimental Approach’.” Management Science 33 (February), 288–296.Google Scholar
  29. Schlender, Brent. (1995). “Why Andy Grove Can't Stop.” Fortune 132 (July 10), 88–98.Google Scholar
  30. Sellers, Patricia. (1995). “So You Fail. Now Bounce Back!” Fortune 131 (May 1), 48–66.Google Scholar
  31. Staw, Barry M. (1981). “The Escalation of Commitment to a Course of Action.” Academy of Management Review 6, 577–587.Google Scholar
  32. Wilson, Robert. (1989). “Deterrence in Oligopolistic Competition.” in P.C. Stern, R. Axelrod, R. Jervis, and R. Radner (eds.), Perspectives on Deterrence (pp. 159–190). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Zajac, Edward J., and Max H. Bazerman. (1991). “Blind Spots in Industry and Competitor Analysis: Implications of Interfirm (Mis)perceptions for Strategic Decisions.” Academy of Management Review 16(1), 37–56.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce H. Clark
    • 1
  • David B. Montgomery
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Marketing Group, College of Business AdministrationNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Graduate School of BusinessStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  3. 3.Marketing Science InstituteCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations