Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quality of life after pelvic ring injuries: follow-up results of a prospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A follow-up after 2 years on average could be done in 43 cases of pelvic ring injuries. Seven were type A, 8 type B and 28 type C lesions. Every type A lesion was treated non-operatively. External fixation and nonoperative management were used with type B injuries. As well as non-operative treatment, both internal and external surgical techniques were employed for type C fractures. While group A hardly mentioned pain in the follow-up, groups B and C suffered dorsal pelvic pain of comparable intensity irrespective of the therapeutic measures taken. Anatomic reduction does not guarantee freedom from pain. We also rated hip joint flexibility and ability to walk according to the Merle D'Aubigné score. Because of their pelvic injuries 50% of the type C patients changed their profession. The sequelae of the accident on sports and leisure time activities will be considered as well as the subjective contentment evaluated. Unstable and dislocated pelvic ring injuries permanently interfere to a high degree with the quality of life. It is remarkable that many of the traumatic lesions which interfere with the quality of life are caused by the traumatic violence itself and cannot be influenced by the manner of surgical stabilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bosch U, Pohlemann T, Haas N, Tscherne H (1992) Klassifikation und Management des komplexen Beckentraumas. Unfallchirurg 95:189–196

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bouillon B, Hirschel V, Imig R, Tiling T, Troidl H (1989) Lebensqualität — Kriterium der Behandlungsstrategie Schwerstverletzter. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II (Kongreßbericht 1989):117–122

    Google Scholar 

  3. Draijer F, Egbers H-J, Havemann D, Zenker W (1995) Nachuntersuchungsergebnisse konservativ und operativ behandelter Beckenringverletzungen im Rahmen einer prospektiven Studie. Unfallchirurg 98:355–360

    Google Scholar 

  4. Egbers H-J, Draijer F, Havemann D, Zenker W (1992) Stabilisierung des Beckenrings mit Fixateur externe. Orthopäde 21:363–372

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frey D, Rogner O, Schüler M, Körte C, Havemann D (1985) Psychological determinants in the convalescense of accident patients. Basic Appl Social Psychol 6:317–328

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hamelmann H (1989) Eröffnungsansprache des Präsidenten. Langenbecks Arch. Chir. Suppl. II (Kongreßbericht):3–8

    Google Scholar 

  7. Havemann D, Egbers H.-J. (1989) Der Fixateur exteme bei der Behandlung schwerer Beckenfrakturen. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II:445–449

    Google Scholar 

  8. Havemann D, Rogner O, Frey D (1984) Sozialpsychologische Aspekte der Genesung von Unfallpatienten. Hefte Unfallheilkd 162:311–312

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hendrich V, Schlickewei W (1984) Polytrauma und Beckenringfraktur. Hefte Unfallheilkd 164:282–286

    Google Scholar 

  10. Henderson R (1989) The long-term results of nonoperatively treated major pelvic ring disruptions. J Orthop Trauma 3:41–47

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hofmann G, Bredow J (1986) Spätergebnisse der Beckenringläsionen — Behandlung mit dem Fixateur exteme. Hefte Unfallheilkd 181:612–618

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karnofsky DA (1976) Clinical evaluation of anti cancerdrugs. GANN Monograph 2:223–231

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pennal GF, Tile M, Waddel JP, Garside H (1980) Pelvic disruption: assessment and classification. Clin Orthop 151:12–21

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pohlemann T (1994) ‘Outcome’ nach SI-Verletzungen. Hefte Unfallchirurg 241:431–437

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pohlemann T, Gänsslen A, Kiessling B, Bosch U, Haas N, Tscherne H (1992) Indikationsstellung und Osteosynthesetechniken am Beckenring. Unfallchirurg 95:197–209

    Google Scholar 

  16. Probst J (1992) Lebensqualität und volkswirtschaftliche Bedeutung. Unfallchirurgie 18:114–119

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rommens PM, Vanderschot PM, De Broodt P, Broos PL (1992) Surgical management of pelvic ring disruptions. Unfallchirurg 95:455–462

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tile M, Burri C, Poigenfürst J (1991) Pelvis. In: Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Scheider R, Willenegger H (eds) Manual of internal fixation. Techniques recommended by the AO-/ASIF Group. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 485–500

    Google Scholar 

  19. Troidl H (1989) Lebensqualität als entscheidendes Kriterium im Alltag und in der Forschung des Chirurgen. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II (Kongreßbericht 1989):101–107

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Draijer, F., Egbers, H.J. & Havemann, D. Quality of life after pelvic ring injuries: follow-up results of a prospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116, 22–26 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00434095

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00434095

Keywords

Navigation