Psychopharmacology

, Volume 63, Issue 3, pp 245–250 | Cite as

Placebo response, placebo effect, and two attributes

  • D. M. McNair
  • G. Gardos
  • D. S. Haskell
  • S. Fisher
Original Investigations

Abstract

Two putative predictors of placebo response were studied in three samples of psychiatric outpatients. Two groups, 73 university medical center patients and 56 college health service patients, underwent 1 week of placebo treatment. A quasi-control group of 112 patients receiving no medication waited about 1 week before beginning psychotherapy. One attribute, acquiescence or traditionalism, predicted placebo response, thereby replicating prior findings. Acquiescence was unrelated to change in controls indicating that it may represent a correlate of true placebo effect under some conditions. Additonal findings suggested qualifications as to the generality of the relationship. The second attribute, autonomic awareness, was associated with change in all three samples. It appeared to predict nonspecific improvement unrelated to placebo probably due to its relationship to intensity of somatization.

Key words

Placebo response Personality Bass acquiescence scale Autonomic awareness scale Nonspecific factors 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bass, B.: Development and evaluation of a scale for measuring social acquiescence. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 53, 296–299 (1956)Google Scholar
  2. Batterman, R. C.: Placebo and nonreactors to analgesics. Fed. Proc. 16, 280, Abstract No. 1197 (1957)Google Scholar
  3. Blalock, H. M.: Causal inferences in nonexperimental research. North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press 1964Google Scholar
  4. Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H., Covi, L.: The Hopkins symptom checklist (HSCL). In: Psychological measurements in psychopharmacology P. Pichot, ed., pp. 79–110. Basle: Karger 1974Google Scholar
  5. Fisher, S.: The placebo reactor: Thesis, antithesis, synthesis and hypothesis. Dis. Nerv. Syst. 28, 510–515 (1967)Google Scholar
  6. Fisher, S., Fisher, R. L.: Placebo response and acquiescence. Psychopharmacologia 4, 298–301 (1963)Google Scholar
  7. Galway, R.: Autonomic awareness and tolerance of ischemic pain. Ph. D. dissertation, Boston University 1971Google Scholar
  8. Honigfeld, G.: Non-specific factors in treatment Dis. Nerv. Syst. 25, 145–156, 225–239 (1964)Google Scholar
  9. Joyce, C. R. B.: Consistent differences in individual reactions to drugs and dummies. Br. J. Pharmacol. 14, 512–521 (1959)Google Scholar
  10. Lasagna, L., Mosteller, F., von Felsinger, J. M., Beecher, H. K.: A study of the placebo response. Am. J. Med. 16, 770–779 (1954)Google Scholar
  11. Liberman, R.: An experimental study of the placebo response under three different situations of pain. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2, 233–246 (1964)Google Scholar
  12. Mandler, G., Mandler, J. M., Uviller, E. T.: Autonomic feedback: The perception of autonomic activity. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 56, 367–373 (1958)Google Scholar
  13. McNair, D. M., Fisher, S., Kahn, R. J., Droppleman, L. F.: Drugpersonality interaction in intensive outpatient treatment. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 22, 128–135 (1970)Google Scholar
  14. McNair, D. M., Kahn, R. J., Droppleman, L. F., Fisher, S.: Patient acquiescence and drug effects. In: Non-specific factors in drug therapy K. Rickels, ed., pp. 59–71 Springfield, Ill: Thomas 1968Google Scholar
  15. McNair, D. M., Lorr, M., Droppleman, L. F.: Profile of mood states. California: Educational and Industrial Testing Service 1971Google Scholar
  16. Raab, E., Rickels, K., Moore, E.: A double-blind evaluation of tybamate in anxious neurotic medical clinic patients. Am. J. Psychiatry 120, 1005–1007 (1964)Google Scholar
  17. Shapiro, A. K., Mike, V., Barten, H., Shapiro, E.: Study of the placebo effect with a self-administered placebo test. Compr. Psychiatry 14, 535–548 (1973)Google Scholar
  18. Schutz, R. E., Foster, R. J.: A factor analytic study of acquiescent and extreme response set. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 23, 435–447 (1963)Google Scholar
  19. Uhlenhuth, E. H., Covi, L., Lipman, R. S. Indications for minor tranquilizers in anxious outpatients. In: Drugs and the brain P. Black, ed., pp. 203–221. Baltimore: Hopkins 1969Google Scholar
  20. Wolf, S., Doering, C. R., Clark, M. L., Hagans, J. A.: Chance distribution and the placebo “reactor” J. Lab. Clin. Med 49, 837–841 (1957)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. M. McNair
    • 1
  • G. Gardos
    • 2
  • D. S. Haskell
    • 3
  • S. Fisher
    • 4
  1. 1.Clinical Psychopharmacology Laboratory, Division of PsychiatryBoston University School of MedicineBostonUSA
  2. 2.Boston State HospitalBostonUSA
  3. 3.Westwood LodgeWestwoodUSA
  4. 4.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Texas Medical BranchGalvestonUSA

Personalised recommendations