Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pain and suffering: what is the unit?

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nonspecific low back pain presents several problems to health care providers. Although the number of patients who are registered as disabled due to low back pain has dramatically increased in recent years, its incidence and severity remain fairly constant. The relationship between perceived backache and subsequent disability is not linear, and other factors may influence a patient's decision to seek help. These factors include the patient's psychological and emotional state, especially his or her past experiences, extant mood and anxiety about anticipated consequences. Physicians should not rely on a simple ‘disease model’ when treating low back pain but should try to identify the biopsychosocial factors involved and should understand that pain and suffering are not always synonymous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bonica JJ. Importance of the problem. In: Andersson S, Bond M, Mehta M, Swerdlow M, eds. Chronic Noncancer Pain. Lancaster: MTP Press, 1987: 13.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nachemson AL. Newest knowledge of low back pain: a critical look. Clin Orthoped 1992; 279: 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cypress BK. Characteristics of physician visits for back symptoms: a national perspective. Am J Pub Health 1983; 73: 389.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lemrow N, Adams D, Coffey R, et al. The 50 Most Frequent Diagnosis-related Groups (RGs), Diagnoses, and Procedures: Statistics by Hospital Size and Location Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Policy and Research, Public Health Service. Hospital studies program research note 13. (DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 90-3465) 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Volinn E. Theories of back pain and health care utilization. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1991; 2: 739–748.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Melzack R, Wall PD. Science 1965; 150: 971–979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fordyce W, Fowler R, DeLateur B. An application of behavior modification technique to a problem of chronic pain. Behav Res Ther 1968; 6: 105–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fordyce W, Fowler R, Lehmann J, DeLateur B. Some implications of learning in problems of chronic pain. J Chronic Dis 1968; 179–186.

  9. Waddell G, Bryn-Jones M. Trends in British sickness and invalidity benefit for back incapacities, Br Med J 1993; in press

  10. Cassell EJ. Recognizing suffering. Hastings Center Report 1991; May-June, 24–31.

  11. Budd MA. Human suffering: the road to illness or the gateway to learning? Proceedings of the Lee Travis Institute for Biopsychosocial Research and the US Public Health Service, Boston, MA 1992: 1–17.

  12. Allan DB, Waddell GW. An historical perspective on low back pain and disability. Acta Orthoped Scand 1989; 234 (Suppl.): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Sommerville D, Main C. A fear-avoidance in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain 1993; 52: 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Troup J, Foreman T, Baxter C, et al. The perception of back pain and the role of psychophysical tests of lifting capacity. Spine 1987; 12: 645–657.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gyntelberg F. One year incidence of low back pain among male residents of Copenhagen aged 40–59. Danish Med Bull 1974; 21: 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Spengler D, Bigos S, et al. Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study. I Overview and cost analysis. Spine 1986; 11: 241.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bigos S, Battie M, Spengler D, et al. A prospective study of work perceptions and psychosocial factors affecting the report of back injury. Spine 1991; 16: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cameron L, Leventhal E, Leventhal H. Symptom representations and effect as determinants of care seeking in a community-dwelling, adult sample population. Health Psychol 1993; 12: 171–179.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zola IK. Pathways to the doctor—from person to patient. Soc Sci Med 1973; 7: 677–689.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fordyce W, Bigos S, Battie M, Fisher L. MMPI Scale 3 as a predictor of back injury report: what does it tell us? Clin J Pain 1992; 8: 222–226.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lee VL. Transdermal interpretation of the subject matter of behavioral analysis. Am Psychol 1992; 47: 1337–1343.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Powers WT. Feedback: beyond behaviorism. Science 1973; 179: 351–356.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Washington School of Medicine, WA, USA

    W. E. Rordyce

Authors
  1. W. E. Rordyce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rordyce, W.E. Pain and suffering: what is the unit?. Qual Life Res 3 (Suppl 1), S51–S56 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00433377

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00433377

Key words

Search

Navigation