Skip to main content
Log in

Drug preference and mood in humans: d-amphetamine

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A total of 31 normal human volunteers participated in a nine-session experiment. During the first four sessions, they received alternately 5 mg d-amphetamine or placebo. During the next five sessions, they were given a choice between amphetamine and placebo. Subjective effects were assessed using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) before the drug was taken and 1, 3, and 6 h later. Subjects chose amphetamine a mean of 4.03 times. Compared with placebo, amphetamine produced changes in mood on the POMS including increased Vigor, Elation, Friendliness, Arousal and Positive Mood and decreased Confusion. These differences were greatest 3 h after ingestion. Mood changes produced by d-amphetamine were comparable in all subjects regardless of the actual number of times each chose the drug. These data suggest that that subjective effects do not predict drug choice. The results are discussed in terms of developing methods for predicting the abuse potential of psychotropic drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balster RL, Schuster CR (1973) A comparison of d-amphetamine, l-amphetamine and methamphetamine self-administration in rhesus monkeys. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1:67–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole JO, Pope HG, La Brie R, Ionescu-Pioggia M (1978) Assessing the subjective effects of stimulants in casual users. Clin Pharmacol Ther 24:243–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneau GA, Inoki R (1967) Nicotine self-administration in monkeys. Ann NY Acad Sci 142:277–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischman MW, Schuster CR, Resnekov L, Fennel W, Shick JFE, Krasnegor NA (1976) Cardiovascular and subjective effects of intravenous cocaine in man. Arch Gen Psychiatry 33:983–989

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1951) The design of experiments (6th ed.) Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford RB, Balster RL (1977) Reinforcing properties of intravenous procaine in rhesus monkeys. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 6:289–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert RM (1978) Schedule-induced self-administration of drugs. In: Blackman DE, Sanger DJ (eds) Contemporary research in behavioral pharmacology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 289–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerbeck DM, Mitchell CL (1978) The reinforcing properties of procaine and d-amphetamine compared in rhesus monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 204:558–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson HM, Ivester CA, Morton BR (1979) Nicotine self-administration in rats. In: Krasnegor N (ed) Cigarette smoking as a dependence process. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Research Monograph Series No. 23, pp 70–90

  • Jasinski DR (1973) Assessment of the dependence liability of opiates and sedative-hypnotics. In: Goldberg L, Hoffmeister F (eds) Psychic Dependence. Bayer-Symposium IV. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 160–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasinski DR, Martin WR, Sapira JD (1968) Antagonism of the subjective behavioral, pupillary, and respiratory depressant effects of cyclazocine by naloxone. Clin Pharmacol Ther 9:217–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasinski DR, Martin WR, Hoeldtke RD (1970) Effects of short- and long-term administration of pentazocine in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 11:385–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasinski DR, Nutt JG, Griffith JD (1974) Effects of diethylpropion and d-amphetamine after subcutaneous and oral administration. Clin Pharmacol Ther 16:645–652

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson CE (1978) Drugs as reinforcers. In: Blackman DE, Sanger DJ (eds) Contemporary research in behavioral pharmacology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 325–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson CE (1980) The reinforcing properties of procaine, chloroprocaine and proparacaine in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology 67:189–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson CE, Balster RL (1978) A summary of the results of self-administration studies using substitution procedures in primates. Bull Nare XXX:43–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson CE, Schuster CR (1975) A choice procedure for drug reinforcers: cocaine and methylphenidate in the rhesus monkey. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 193:676–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson CE, Schuster CR (1977) Procedures for the preclinical assessment of abuse potential of psychotropic drugs in animals. In: Thompson T, Unna KR (eds) Predicting dependence liability of stimulant and depressant drugs. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 203–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin WR (1973) Assessment of the abuse potentiality of amphetamines and LSD-like hallucinogens in man and its relationship to basic animal assessment programs. In: Goldberg L, Hoffmeister F (eds) Psychic dependence. Bayer-Symposium IV. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 146–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin WR, Fraser HF, Gorodetzky CW, Rosenberg DE (1965) Studies of the dependence-producing potential of the narcotic antagonist 2-cyclopropylmethyl-2′-hydroxy-5, 9-dimethyl-6, 7-benzomorphan (cyclazocine, Win-20, 740, ARC II-C-3). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 150:426–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin WR, Fraser HF (1961) A comparative study of physiological and subjective effects of heroin and morphine administered intravenously in postaddicts. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 133:388–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin WR, Jasinski DR, Haertzen CA, Kay DC, Jones BE, Mansky PA, Carpenter RW (1973) Methadone—a reevaluation. Arch Gen Psychiat 28:286–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin WR, Sloan JW, Sapira JD, Jasinski DR (1971) Physiologic, subjective and behavioral effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine, and methylphenidate in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 12:245–258

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF (1971) Profile of mood states (Manual). Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickens R, Harris WC (1968) Self-administration of d-amphetamine by rats. Psychopharmacologia 12:158–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster CR, Johanson CE (1974) The use of animal models for the study of drug abuse. In: Gibbins RJ, Israel Y, Kalant H, Popham RE, Schmidt W, Smart RG (eds) Research advances in alcohol and drug problems, vol I. John Wiley, New York, p 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster CR, Thompson T (1969) Self-administration of and behavioral dependence on drugs. Ann Rev Pharmacol 9:483–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson T, Schuster CR (1964) Morphine self-administration, food-reinforced and avoidance behaviors in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacologia 5:87–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks JR (1962) Experimental morphine addiction: method for automatic intravenous injections in unrestrained rats. Science 138:143–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles in experimental design. (2nd edn.) McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 199–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolverton WL, Balster RL (1979) Reinforcing properties of some local anesthetics in rhesus monkeys. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 11:669–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanagita T (1973) An experimental framework for evaluation of dependence liability of various types of drugs in monkeys. Bull Narc XXV:57–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanagita T, Takahashi S (1973) Dependence liability of several sedative-hypnotic agents evaluated in monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 185:307–316

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Portions of these data have been previously reported in a chapter entitled Drug Self-Administration in Humans by the same authors which appeared in Self-Administration of Abused Substances: Methods for Study. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Research Monograph Series No. 20, pp. 68–85 (1978)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johanson, C.E., Uhlenhuth, E.H. Drug preference and mood in humans: d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 71, 275–279 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00433062

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00433062

Key words

Navigation