, Volume 74, Issue 4, pp 383–388 | Cite as

Cholinergic drug effects on visual discriminations: A signal detection analysis

  • Katharine S. Milar
Original Investigations


Signal detection analysis was used to examine the effects of scopolamine, amphetamine, and physostigmine on a brightness discrimination task. Four groups of rats were exposed to different reinforcement contingencies for correct responses in the presence of S+ stimuli and correct response failures in the presence of S- stimuli. Under non-drug conditions, orderly signal detection data were obtained with the group design. Contrary to a disinhibition hypothesis of cholinergic effects, scopolamine disrupted stimulus sensitivity and not response bias, but only when the discrimination was difficult. Drugs did not affect sensitivity of an earlier, simpler discrimination. The drug effects on response tendency for this simple discrimination task were difficult to interpret.

Key words

Signal detection Scopolamine Visual discrimination d-Amphetamine Rats 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Appel J, Dykstra L (1977) Drugs, discrimination, and signal detection theory. In: Thompson T, Dews P (eds) Advances in behavioral pharmacology, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 140–166Google Scholar
  2. Brown K, Warburton D (1971) Attenuation of stimulus sensitivity by scopolamine. Psychonom Sci 22:297–298Google Scholar
  3. Carlton P (1963) Cholinergic mechanisms in the control of behavior by the brain. Psychol Rev 70:19–39Google Scholar
  4. Carlton P (1969) Brain acetylcholine and inhibition. In: Tapp JT (ed) Reinforcement and behavior. Academic Press, New York, pp 286–327Google Scholar
  5. Dykstra L, Appel J (1974) Effects of LSD on auditory perception: A signal detection analysis. Psychopharmacologia 34:289–307Google Scholar
  6. Frey PW, Colliver JA (1973) Sensitivity and responsivity measures for discrimination learning. Learn Motiv 4:327–342Google Scholar
  7. Green D, Swets J (1966) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Grier J (1971) Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: Computing formulas. Psychol Bull 75:424–429Google Scholar
  9. Heise GA (1975) Discrete trial analysis of drug action. Fed Proc 34: 1898–1903Google Scholar
  10. Heise GA, Lilie N (1970) Effects of scopolamine, atropine, and d-amphetamine on internal and external control of responding on non-reinforced trials. Psychopharmacologia 18:38–49Google Scholar
  11. Kelleher R, Morse W (1968) Determinants of the specificity of behavioral effects of drugs. Ergeb Physiol 60:1–56Google Scholar
  12. Ksir C (1975) Scopolamine and amphetamine effects on discrimination: Interaction with stimulus control. Psychopharmacologia 43:37–41Google Scholar
  13. Laties V, Weiss B (1966) Influence of drugs on behavior controlled by internal and external stimuli. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 152:388–396Google Scholar
  14. Martin R, Conner R (1975) Computer control for operant oriented laboratories. Behav Res Methods Instrum 7:151–156Google Scholar
  15. Milar K, Halgren C, Heise G (1978) A reappraisal of scopolamine effects on inhibition. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 9:307–313Google Scholar
  16. Robbins T, Iversen S (1973) Amphetamine-induced disruption of temporal discrimination of response disinhibition. Nature (New Biol) 245:191–192Google Scholar
  17. Swets J (1973) The relative operating characteristic in psychology. Science 182:990–1000Google Scholar
  18. Warburton D (1972) The cholinergic control of internal inhibition. In: Boakes RA, Halliday MS (eds) Inhibition and learning. Academic Press, New York, pp 431–458Google Scholar
  19. Warburton D,(1974) The effects of scopolamine on a two-cue discrimination. Q J Exp Psychol 26:275–284Google Scholar
  20. Warburton D, Brown K (1972) The facilitation of discrimination performance by physostigmine sulphate. Psychopharmacologia 33: 275–284Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katharine S. Milar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations