Advertisement

Psychopharmacology

, Volume 76, Issue 3, pp 236–239 | Cite as

Do urinary MHPG and plasma drug levels correlate with response to amitriptyline therapy?

  • Hans J. Gaertner
  • Franz Kreuter
  • Günther Scharek
  • Gerlinde Wiatr
  • Ursula Breyer-Pfaff
Original Investigations

Abstract

Twenty-nine inpatients with primary affective disorder were treated with 150 mg amitriptyline (AT) daily for 28 days. Pretreatment urinary excretion of 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol (MHPG) was measured in two or three 24-h urine samples. Plasma levels of AT and nortriptyline (NT) were determined after 14, 21, and 28 days of treatment. MHPG excretion was significantly correlated with clinical response to treatment. Responders defined by two different methods showed higher pretreatment MHPG excretion than nonresponders. Correspondingly, high MHPG excretors (median split) showed significantly more improvement than low excretors. These relationships were even more apparent when possibly incomplete urine samples (creatinine excretion below 1000 mg/24 h) were excluded. The high and low MHPG subgroups did not significantly differ from each other in their plasma levels of AT, NT, or AT plus NT. A significant rank correlation between clinical response and plasma levels of AT and/or NT did not exist, but there was a trend towards lower levels in responders.

Key words

Methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol MHPG Amitriptyline Plasma drug level Drug response 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angst J, Baumann U, Hippius H, Rothweiler R (1974) Clinical aspects of resistance to imipramine therapy. Pharmakopsychiatr Neuropsychopharmakol 7:211–216Google Scholar
  2. Beckmann H, Goodwin FK (1975) Antidepressant response to tricyclics and urinary MHPG in unipolar patients: Clinical response to imipramine or amitriptyline. Arch Gen Psychiatry 32:17–21Google Scholar
  3. Blombery PA, Kopin IJ, Gordon EK, Markey SP, Ebert MH (1980) Conversion of MHPG to vanillylmandelic acid: Implications for the importance of urinary MHPG. Arch Gen Psychiatry 37:1095–1098Google Scholar
  4. Breyer-Pfaff U, Gaertner HJ, Kreuter F, Scharek G, Brinkschulte M, Wiatr R (1982) Antidepressive effect and pharmacokinetics of amitriptyline with consideration of unbound drug and 10-hydroxynortriptyline plasma levels. Psychopharmacology 76:240–244Google Scholar
  5. Cobbin DM, Requin-Blow B, Williams LR, Williams WO (1979) Urinary MHPG levels and tricyclic antidepressant drug selection. Arch Gen Psychiatry 36:1111–1115Google Scholar
  6. Coppen A, Rama Rao VA, Ruthven CRJ, Goodwin BL, Sandler M (1979) Urinary 4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenylglycol is not a predictor for clinical response to amitriptyline in depressive illness. Psychopharmacology 64:95–97Google Scholar
  7. Dekirmenjian H, Maas JW (1970) An improved procedure of 3-methoxy-4-hydroxy-phenylethylene glycol determination by gas-liquid chromatography. Anal Biochem 35:113–122Google Scholar
  8. Feighner JP, Robins E, Guze SB, Woodruff Jr RA, Winokur G, Murray R (1972) Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Arch Gen Psychiatry 26:57–63Google Scholar
  9. Gaertner HJ, Wiatr G, Kuss HJ (1980) 4-Methoxy-3-hydroxyphenylglycol as an internal standard for the determination of 3-Methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol in urine: Results obtained in depressed patients and healthy controls. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 18:579–583Google Scholar
  10. Goodwin FK, Cowdry RW, Webster MH (1978) Predictors of drug response in the affective disorders: Toward an integrated approach. In: Lipton MA, Di Mascio A, Killam KF (eds) Psychopharmacology: A generation of progress. Raven, New York, pp 1277–1288Google Scholar
  11. Hamilton M (1960) A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 23:56–62Google Scholar
  12. Hollister LE, Davis KL, Berger PA (1980) Subtypes of depression based on excretion of MHPG and response to nortriptyline. Arch Gen Psychiatry 37:1107–1110Google Scholar
  13. Maas JW, Fawcett JA, Dekirmenjian H (1972) Catecholamine metabolism, depressive illness and drug response. Arch Gen Psychiatry 26:252–262Google Scholar
  14. Maas JW (1975) Biogenic amines and depression: Biochemical and pharmacological separation of two types of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 32:1357–1361Google Scholar
  15. Maas JW, Hattox SE, Greene NM, Landis DH (1979) 3-Methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylethyleneglycol production by human brain in vivo. Science 205:1025–1027Google Scholar
  16. Modai I, Apter A, Golomb M, Wigsenbeek H (1979) Response to amitriptyline and urinary MHPG in bipolar depressive patients. Neuropsychobiology 5:181–184Google Scholar
  17. Schildkraut JJ (1965) The Catecholamine hypothesis of affective disorders: A review of supporting evidence. Am J Psychiatry 122:509–522Google Scholar
  18. Schildkraut JJ (1974) Biochemical criteria for classifying depressive disorders and predicting responses to pharmaco-therapy: Preliminary findings from studies of norepinephrine metabolism. Pharmakopsychiat Neuropsychopharmakol 7:98–107Google Scholar
  19. Spiker DG, Edwards D, Hanin I, Neil JF, Kupfer DJ (1980) Urinary MHPG and clinical response to amitriptyline in depressed patients. Am J Psychiatry 137:1183–1187Google Scholar
  20. Taube SL, Kirstein LS, Sweeney DR, Heninger GR, Maas JW (1978) Urinary 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol and psychiatric diagnosis. Am J Psychiatry 135:78–82Google Scholar
  21. Vestergaard P, Leverett R (1958) Constancy of urinary creatinine excretion. J Lab Clin Med 51:211–214Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans J. Gaertner
    • 1
  • Franz Kreuter
    • 2
  • Günther Scharek
    • 2
  • Gerlinde Wiatr
    • 1
  • Ursula Breyer-Pfaff
    • 3
  1. 1.Universitäts-NervenklinikTübingenGermany
  2. 2.Bezirkskrankenhaus GünzburgGünzburgGermany
  3. 3.Institut für ToxikologieUniversität TübingenTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations