Skip to main content
Log in

Destructive ophthalmic procedures, a comparison between a developed and a developing country

  • Published:
Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The causes for enucleation, evisceration, and exenteration were compared between Malawi and Israel. Differences in etiology, age, and sex were found due to the medical facilities, standard of living, and cultural background of each country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batten, K.L.: Causes of enucleation as seen in Jerusalem. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 55, 174–176 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davanger, M.: Causes of enucleation in Uganda. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 54, 252–255 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, A.C.: Tumor in the eye and adnexa in African of Uganda. Cancer 20, 1689–1698 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shapiro, A., Monselise, M.B. Destructive ophthalmic procedures, a comparison between a developed and a developing country. Albrecht von Graefes Arch. Klin. Ophthalmol. 207, 271–273 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00431164

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00431164

Keywords

Navigation