Skip to main content
Log in

Polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of urinary tract tuberculosis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a technique that can be used to amplify a specific DNA genomic sequence, whereby the presence of an extremely small number of bacteria can be detected. The high sensitivity of PCR is particularly useful in paucibacillary situations such as non-pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). The aims of the present study were to establish a PCR assay for the rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTb) in urine, to compare the sensitivity of PCR with routine culture technique (Bactec) and to determine the optimal type of urine specimen for PCR detection of MTb. In the first phase of the study, a total of 92 urine specimens were collected from 83 patients with suspected urinary tract TB. Two urine specimens in 2 patients were positive for TB by both PCR and Bactec, while 90 specimens from 81 patients were negative by both methods. Inhibition of PCR was present in nine urine specimens (10%). In the second phase of the study, a further seven patients were selected for intensive investigation to determine the optimal urine sampling for PCR detection of MTb. The conclusions of the study are that PCR can provide much faster confirmation of urinary TB (within 24–48 h) than Bactec urine culture (which may take several weeks). About 10% of urine specimens could not be evaluated by PCR due to the presence of inhibitory substances of unknown nature. MTb organisms were found to be excreted intermittently in the urine of infected patients, and single specimens were more likely to be false negative than a 24-h sample. The best method appeared to be the concentration of a large volume of urine, for instance 11 concentrated to 2 ml.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brisson-Noël A, Gicquel B, Lecossier D, Lévy-Frébault V, Nassif X, Hance AJ (1989) Rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis by amplification of mycobacterial DNA in clinical samples. Lancet 11:1069

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brisson-Noël A, Aznar C, Chureau C, Nguyen S, Pierre C, Bartoli M, Bonete R, Pialoux G, Gicquel B, Garrigue G (1991) Diagnosis of tuberculosis by DNA amplification in clinical practice evaluation. Lancet 338:364

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buck GE, O'Hara LC, Summersgill JT (1992) Rapid, simple method for treating clinical specimens containing Mycobacterium tuberculosis to remove DNA for polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 30:1331

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cousins DV, Wilton SD, Francis BR, Gow BL (1992) Use of polymerase chain reaction for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 30:255

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Wit D, Steyn L, Shoemaker S, Sogin M (1990) Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens by DNA amplification. J Clin Microbiol 28:2437

    Google Scholar 

  6. Del Portillo P, Murillo LA, Patarroyo ME (1991) Amplification of a species-specific DNA fragment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and its possible use in diagnosis. J Clin Microbiol 29:2163

    Google Scholar 

  7. Demmler GJ, Buffone GJ, Schimbor CM, May RA (1988) Detection of cytomegalovirus in urine from newborns by using polymerase chain reaction DNA amplification. J Infect Dis 158:1177

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eisenach KD, Cave MD, Bates JH, Crawford JT (1990) Polymerase chain reaction amplification of a repetitive sequence specific for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 161:977

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eisenach KD, Sifford MD, Cave MD, Bates JH, Crawford JT (1991) Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples using a polymerase chain reaction. Am Rev Respir Dis 144:1160

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khan G, Kangro HO, Coates PJ, Heath RB (1991) Inhibitory effects of urine on the polymerase chain reaction for cytomegalovirus DNA. J Clin Pathol 44:360

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kolk AHJ, Schuitema ARJ, Kuijper S, Van Leeuwen J, Hermans PWM, Van Embden JDA, Hartskeerl RA (1992) Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples by using polymerase chain reaction and a nonradioactive detection system. J Clin Microbiol 30:2567

    Google Scholar 

  12. Manjunath N, Shankar P, Rajan L, Bhargawa A, Saluja S, Shriniwas (1991) Evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Tubercle 72:21

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van Helden PD (1985) Potential Z-DNA-forming elements in serum DNA from human systemic lupus erythematosis. J Immunol 134:177

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van Helden PD, Du Toit R, Jordaan A, Taljaard B, Pitout J, Victor T (1991) The use of the polymerase chain reaction test in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. S Afr Med J 80:515

    Google Scholar 

  15. Victor T, Du Toit R, Van Helden PD (1992) Purification of sputum samples through sucrose improves detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 30:1514

    Google Scholar 

  16. Victor T, Jordaan A, Du Toit R, Van Helden PD (1993) Laboratory experience and guidelines for avoiding false positive polymerase chain reaction results. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 31:531

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Vollenhoven, P., Heyns, C.F., de Beer, P.M. et al. Polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of urinary tract tuberculosis. Urol. Res. 24, 107–111 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00431088

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00431088

Key words

Navigation