Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing retinal/neural function in the presence of ocular media opacities

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Techniques currently available for investigating retinal/neural function in the presence of media opacities have traditionally been assessed in terms of their ability to predict the level of Snellen acuity which will be achieved following therapy. We propose an alternative method of assessment in which techniques are evaluated in terms of their ability to pre-operatively distinguish patients with reduced retinal/neural function from normals. In order to demonstrate this method of assessment, the data from a paper comparing the predictive abilities of a white-light and a laser interferometer in patients undergoing capsulotomy [21] have been re-analysed. The approach enables fair comparison of the predictive abilities of the various techniques and will therefore help to resolve the issue of which technique provides the best means of assessing retinal/neural function in the presence of media opacities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Faulkner W (1983) Laser interferometric prediction of postoperative visual acuity in patients with cataracts. Am J Ophthalmol 95: 626–636

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rassow B, Wolf D (1977) Die Messung der retinalen Sehschärfe mit dem Laserinterferengerät als klinische Routinemethode. Adv Ophthalmol 34: 116–142

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lotmar W (1980) Apparatus for the measurement of retinal visual acuity by moire fringes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 19: 393–400

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brodie SE (1987) Evaluation of cataractous eyes with opaque media. Int Ophthalmol Clin 27: 153–162

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sinclair SH, Loebl M, Riva CE (1979) Blue field entopic phenomenon in cataract patients. Arch Ophthalmol 97: 1092–1095

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barrett BT, Davison PA, Eustace P (1994) The effects of posterior segment disorders on oscillatory displacement thresholds, and on acuities as measured using the potential acuity meter and laser interferometer. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 14: 132–138

    Google Scholar 

  7. Enoch J, Williams RA (1983) Development of clinical tests of vision: initial data on two hyperacuity paradigms. Percept Psychophys 33: 314–322

    Google Scholar 

  8. Whitaker D, Deady J (1989) Prediction of visual function behind cataract using displacement threshold hyperacuity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 9: 20–24

    Google Scholar 

  9. Minkowski JS, Palese M, Guyton DL (1983) Potential Acuity Meter using a minute aerial pinhole aperture. Ophthalmology 90: 1360–1368

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bernth-Petersen P, Naeser K (1982) Clinical evaluation of the Lotmar Visometer for macula testing in cataract patients. Acta Ophthalmol 60: 525–532

    Google Scholar 

  11. Halliday BL, Ross JE (1983) Comparison of two interferometers for predicing visual acuity in patients with cataract. Br J Ophthalmol 67: 273–277

    Google Scholar 

  12. Barrett BT (1994) Comparing techniques for evaluating retinal/neural function behind cataract. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 14: 433–434

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guyton DL (1986) Misleading predictions of postoperative visual acuity. Arch Ophthalmol 104: 189–190

    Google Scholar 

  14. Elliott DB, Sheridan M (1988) The use of accurate visual acuity measurements in clinical anti-cataract formulation trials. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 8: 397–401

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lovie-Kitchin JE (1988) Validity and reliability of visual acuity measurements. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 8: 363–370

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bailey IL, Lovie JE (1976) New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 53: 745–753

    Google Scholar 

  17. Courtney P (1992) The national cataract surgery survey. I. Method and descriptive features. Eye 6: 487–492

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stark WJ, Worthen DM, Holladay IT et al. (1983) The FDA report on intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 90: 311–317

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miller ST, Graney MJ, Elam IT, Applegate WB, Freeman JM (1988) Predictions of outcomes from cataract surgery in elderly persons. Ophthalmology 95: 1125–1129

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sherman J, Davis E, Schnider C, et al. (1988) Presurgical prediction of postsurgical visual acuity in patients with media opacities. J Am Optom Assoc 59: 481–488

    Google Scholar 

  21. Strong N (1992) Interferometric assessment of potential visual acuity before YAG capsulotomy; relative performance of three instruments. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 220: 42–46

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leibowitz HM, Kreuger DE, Maunder LR, et al. (1980) The Framingham eye study monograph: an ophthalmological and epidemiological study of cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration and visual acuity in a general population of 2631 adults. Surv Ophthalmol 24 [Suppl]: 335–610

    Google Scholar 

  23. Green DM, Swets JA (1966) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley New York, pp 5–53

    Google Scholar 

  24. Owsley C, Sloane M (1987) Contrast sensitivity, acuity and perception of ‘real-world’ targets. Br J Ophthalmol 71: 791–796

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McGraw, P.V., Barrett, B.T. Assessing retinal/neural function in the presence of ocular media opacities. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 234, 280–283 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00430424

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00430424

Keywords

Navigation