Skip to main content
Log in

“New discovery. or ancient truth”: Arthur Schnitzler's Fink und Fliederbusch

  • Article
  • Published:
Neophilologus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been generally assumed that Schnitzler's Fink und Fliederbusch is a satire of journalism and politics. Its specific theme, however, takes its cue from the speech in Act 1 in which Kajetan celebrates the identity of opposites (the “Identität der Gegensätze”). That is, the object of satire is not the day to day workings of press and politics but the lack of any informing principle behind their activities which, if taken to its logical conclusions, renders the very idea of principles irrelevant. This lack is most readily apparent in the title character, of course, as well as in Count Niederhof and in Styx; however, it is also clearly echoed in almost every other character as well. It is, in addition, evident almost everywhere in the play, from the basic premise of Fliederbusch's writing for both the liberal and the reactionary publications to the pairing off of erstwhile antagonists at the very end.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Works Cited

  • SchnitzlerArthur. Aphorismen und Betrachtungen. Ed. Robert O.Weiss. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer, 1967. Cited in text as AuB.

    Google Scholar 

  • SchnitzlerArthur. Die Dramatischen Werke. 2 vols. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer, 1962. All page references for Fink und Fliederbusch are to volume 2 of this edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • ApslerAlfred. “A Sociological View of Arthir Schnitzler.” Germanic Review 18 (1943): 90–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • AspetsbergerFriedbert. “Wiener Dichtung der Jahrhundertwende. Beobachtungen zu Schnitzlers und Hofmannsthals Kunstformen.” Studi Germanici 8 (1970): 410–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • BarthoferAlfred. “Eine alte Scherzfrage?? Anmerkungen zu sozialkritischen Aspekten im Werke Arthur Schnitzlers.” Neophilologus 70 (1986): 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • BerlinJeffrey B. “Political Criticism in Arthur Schnitzler's Aphorismen und Betrachtungen.” Neophilologus 57 (1973): 173–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • BerlinJeffrey B. “Journalists, Language and Truth in Arthur Schnitzler's Fink und Fliederbusch.” Modern Austrian Literature 25. 3–4 (1992): 157–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • EvansBergen. Dictionary of Mythology. New York: Dell, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • EwingBlair. “The Politics of Nihilism: Schnitzler's ‘Last Man’.” JIASRA 5.3 (1966): 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • FreytagGustav. Die Journalisten. Stuttgart: Reclam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • HaidaPeter. Komödie um 1900. Wandlungen des Gattungsschemas von Hauptmann bis Sternheim. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • HenselGeorg. “Arthur Schnitzlers Dramen: von Gestern für Heute.” Arthur Schnitzler in neuer Sicht. Ed. HartmutScheible. Munich: Fink, 1981: 292–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • KannRobert A. “Die historische Situation und die entscheidenden politischen Ereignisse zur Zeit und im Leben Arthur Schnitzlers.” Literatur und Kritik 161–2 (Feb.–Mar. 1982): 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • KilianKlaus. Die Komödien Arthur Schnitzlers. Sozialer Rollenzwang und kritische Ethik. Düsseldorf: Bertelsmann, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • KlaarAlfred. Review of Fink und Fliederbusch (1917). Arthur Schnitzler. Aspekte und Akzente. Ed. Hans-UlrichLindken. Frankfurt: Lang, 1984. 358–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • KörnerJosef. Arthur Schnitzlers Gestalten und Probleme. Zürich, Leipzig, Vienna: Amalthea, 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  • KörnerJosef. “Arthur Schnitzlers Spätwerk.” Preussische Jahrbücher 208 (1927): 53–83, 153–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • MelchingerChrista. Illusion und Wirklichkeit im dramatischen Werk Arthur Schnitzlers. Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • OffermansErnst L. Arthur Schnitzler: Das Komödienwerk als Kritik des Impressionismus. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • PerlmannMichaela L. Arthur Schnitzler. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzlersche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polsterer, Susanne M. Die Darstellung der Frau in A. Schnitzlers Dramen. Diss. Vienna, 1949.

  • ReichertHerbert W. “Nietzsche and Schnitzler.” Studies in Arthur Schnitzler. Ed. Herbert W.Reichert and HermanSalinger. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • ReissH. S. “The Problems of Fate and of Religion in the Work of Arthur Schnitzler.” Modern Language Review 40 (1945): 300–08.

    Google Scholar 

  • ReyWilliam. Arthur Schnitzler: Professor Bernhardi. Munich: Fink, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • ReyWilliam. “Judith-Aurelie-Seraphine. Zu Arthur Schnitzlers Komödie der Verführung.” Creative Encounter. Festschrift for Herman Salinger. Ed. Leland R.Phelps. Chapel Hill: U North Carolina P, 1978. 133–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • RobertsAdrian Clive. Arthur Schnitzler and Politics. Riverside, CA: Ariadne, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • ScheibleHartmut. Arthur Schnitzler. Reinbek: Rowohlt (1976) 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • SpechtRichard. Arthur Schnitzler. Berlin: S. Fischer, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  • TeßmerHans. “Der Redakteur in der modernen Literatur.” Das literarische Echo 23 (1920/21): 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • TimmsEdward. Karl Kraus, Apocalyptic Satirist. Culture and Catastrophe in Habsburg Vienna. New Haven and London: Yale UP, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • WagnerRenate, and BrigitteVacha. Wiener Schnitzler-Aufführungen 1891–1970. Munich: Prestel, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • vonWeilenAlexander. Review of Fink und Fliederbusch. Literarisches Echo 20.7 (1 Jan. 1918): 402–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • WistrichRobert S. The Jews of Vienna in the Age of Franz Joseph. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • YatesW. S. Schnitzler, Hofmannsthal, and the Austrian Theatre. New Haven and London: Yale UP, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weinberger, G.J. “New discovery. or ancient truth”: Arthur Schnitzler's Fink und Fliederbusch . Neophilologus 80, 91–110 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00430022

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00430022

Keywords

Navigation