Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of d-methamphetamine on auditory and visual reaction times and detection thresholds in the baboon

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Baboons were trained in both auditory and visual reaction time procedures to release a response lever in the presence of low-intensity stimuli. By varying the stimulus intensity from trial to trial, functions relating reaction time (elapsed time from stimulus onset to lever release) to stimulus intensity were established, and detection thresholds were measured. The effects of acute, IM injections of d-methamphetamine (0.001–1.0 mg/kg) were examined on these psychophysical performance baselines. Reaction times for acoustic stimuli generally were faster for higher drug doses, whereas reaction times for visual stimuli either lengthened or shortened, depending on both drug dose and individual differences among animals. Auditory thresholds were unaffected at all drug doses studied, whereas visual thresholds were generally elevated at doses of 0.1 mg/kg and above.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauer RH, Fuster JM (1978) Effects of d-amphetamine and prefrontal cortical cooling on delayed matching-to-sample behavior. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 8:243–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Delay ER, Steiner NO, Isaac W (1979) Effects of d-amphetamine and methylphenidate upon auditory threshold in the squirrel monkey. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 10:861–864

    Google Scholar 

  • Dews P, Morse WH (1961) Behavioral pharmacology. Annu Rev Pharmacol 1:145–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Frowein HW (1981) Selective effects of barbiturate and amphetamine on information processing and response execution. Acta Psychol 47:105–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller I, Hartmann RJ, Moran E (1983) Phenobarbital and d-amphetamine effects on discrimination performance of rats and juvenile baboons. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 18:107–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Grilly DM (1977) Rate-dependent effects of amphetamine resulting from behavioral competition. Biobehav Rev 1:87–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Hienz RD, Brady JV (1980) Psychophysical profiles differentiate drugs of abuse. Nat Inst Drug Abuse Res Monogr 34:226–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Hienz RD, Eckerman DA (1974) Latency and frequency of responding under discrete-trial fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav 21:341–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Hienz RD, Lukas SE, Brady JV (1981) The effects of pentobarbital upon auditory and visual thresholds in the baboon. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 15:799–805

    Google Scholar 

  • Maickel RP, Levine RM, Zabik JE (1974) Differential effects of d- and l-amphetamine on spontaneous motor activity in mice. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 8:711–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin WR, Sloan JW, Sapira JD, Jasinski DR (1971) Physiologic, subjective, and behavioral effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine, and methylphenidate in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 12:245–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody DB (1970) Reaction time as an index of sensory function. In: Stebbins WC (ed) Animal psychophysics: The design and conduct of sensory experiments. Appleton, New York, pp 277–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill DB, Boggan WO, Grossman SP (1974a) Behavioral effects of amphetamine in rats with lesions in the corpus striatum. J Comp Physiol Psychol 86:1019–1030

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill DB, Ross JF, Grossman SP (1974b) Effects of lesions in the dorsal or ventral striatum on locomotor activity and on locomotor effects of amphetamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2:697–702

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfingst BE, Hienz RD, Kimm J, Miller JM (1975a) Reaction-time procedure for measurement of hearing. I. Suprathreshold functions. J Acoust Soc Am 57:421–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfingst BE, Hienz RD, Miller JM (1975b) Reaction-time procedure for measurement of hearing. II. Threshold functions. J Acoust Soc Am 57:431–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirce CM, Vargas G, Odio M, Maickel RP (1982) Effects of d,l-amphetamine on exploratory activity in mice. Evidence for individual differences in drug response. Res Commun Subst Abuse, 3:49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins WC (1966) Auditory reaction time and the derivation of equal loudness contours for the monkey. J Exp Anal Behav 9:135–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Tecce JJ, Cole JO (1974) Amphetamine effects in man: Paradoxical drowsiness and lowered electrical brain activity (CNV). Science 185:451–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo DA, Gaillard AWK (1975) Drugs, time uncertainty, signal modality and reaction time. In: Rabbit PMA, Dornic S (eds) Attention and performance V., Academic, New York, pp 441–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss B, Laties VG (1962) Enhancement of human performance by caffeine and the amphetamines. Pharmacol Rev 14:1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer BJ (1962) Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hienz, R.D., Lukas, S.E. & Brady, J.V. Effects of d-methamphetamine on auditory and visual reaction times and detection thresholds in the baboon. Psychopharmacology 85, 476–482 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00429668

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00429668

Key words

Navigation