Archives of Microbiology

, Volume 148, Issue 1, pp 77–82 | Cite as

An improved method for protoplast formation and its application in the fusion of Rhodotorula rubra with Saccharomyces cerevisiae

  • C. T. Evans
  • D. Conrad
Original Papers


Protoplasts from various strains of red-pigmented yeasts were generated at high frequency using improved procedures. The use of sulphur-containing amino acids and 2-deoxyglucose in growth media led to impaired cell wall synthesis and rendered cells very susceptible to treatment with mercapto-ethanol and various lytic enzymes. Use of individual lytic enzymes separately resulted in relatively low frequencies of protoplasts from most of the red yeasts examined, whilst use of β-glucoronidase, Novozyme and Zymolyase in series markedly increased stable protoplast formation. The latter effects were shown to be strain specific. The ability to generate large numbers of red yeast protoplasts prompted the attempt to examine intergeneric fusion between auxotrophs of a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Rhodotorula rubra. Putative hybrids were selected as variously-pigmented prototrophic colonies growing on minimal medium and stabilised by subculturing on the latter medium. Unusual cream, orange and yellow hybrid colonies were generated, composed of cells of varying morphologies (chains, multibudded). The majority of stable hybrids contained one nucleus, although several heterokaryons were also observed. Some hybrids possessed the phenotypes of both parents: fusant wcat41 grew as rapidly as the S. cerevisiae parent but also contained an inducible phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) which appeared to be more active than that of the Rhodotorula parent.

Key words

Protoplast formation Zymolase Novozyme β-Glucuromidase Intergeneric fusion 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Becher D, Böttcher F (1983) The cell type of Rhodosporidium toruloides after protoplast fusion between strains of identical and opposite mating type. Curr Microbiol 9:297–300Google Scholar
  2. Böttcher F, Becher D, Klinner U, Samsonova IA, Schilowa B (1980) Genetic structure of yeast hybrids constructed by protoplast fusion. In: Ferenczy L, Farkas G (eds) Advances in protoplast research. Pergamon Press, Budapest Oxford, pp 99–104Google Scholar
  3. Broock MR, Sierra MF, Figueroa LI (1980) Intergeneric fusion of yeast protoplasts. In: Stewart GG, Russel I (eds) Current developments in yeast research. 5th Int Symp Yeasts, London, Ont, Canada, July 20–25, 1980Google Scholar
  4. Eddy AA, Williamson DH (1957) A method for isolating protoplasts from yeast. Nature (London) 179:1252–1253Google Scholar
  5. Evans CT, Hanna K, Conrad D, Peterson W, Misawa M (1987) Production of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL): Isolation and evaluation of yeast strains suitable for commercial production of L-phenylalanine. Appl Micro BiotechnolGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferenczy L (1981) Microbiol protoplast fusion. Symp Soc Gen Microbiol 31:1–34Google Scholar
  7. Groves DP, Oliver SG (1984) Formation of intergeneric hybrids of yeast by protoplast fusion of Yarrowia and Kluyveromyces species. Curr Genet 8:49–55Google Scholar
  8. Hedenstrom M, Höfer M (1974) Protoplasten der Hefe Rhodotorula gracilis. Arch Microbiol 98:51–57Google Scholar
  9. Morgan AJ, Heritage H, Whittaker DA (1977) Protoplast fusion between petite and auxotrophic mutants of the petite-negative yeast, Kluyveromyces lactis. Microbios Lett 4:103–107Google Scholar
  10. Peberdy JF (1980) Protoplast fusion- a tool for genetic manipulation and breeding in industrial microorganisms. Enz Microb Technol 2:23–29Google Scholar
  11. Poulter R, Jeffrey K, Hubbard MJ, Shepherd MG, Sullivan PA (1981) Parasexual genetic analysis of Candida albicans by spheroplast fusion. J Bacteriol 146:833–840Google Scholar
  12. Provost A, Bourguignon C, Fournier P, Ribet A, Heslot H (1978) Intergeneric hybridisation in yeasts through protoplast fusion. FEMS Microbiol Lett 3:309–312Google Scholar
  13. Robinow CF (1975) The preparation of yeasts for light microscopy. Meth Cell Biol 11:1–22Google Scholar
  14. Savchenko GV, Kapultsevich YuG (1980) Hybridisation of yeast from genus Hansenula by protoplast fusion. In: Ferenczy L, Farkas G (eds) Advances in protoplast research. Pergamon Press, Budapest Oxford, pp 125–130Google Scholar
  15. Sipiczki M (1979) Interspecific protoplast fusion in yeasts. Curr Microbiol 3:37–40Google Scholar
  16. Sipiczki M, Ferenczy L (1977) Fusion of Rhodosporidium (Rhodotorula) protoplasts. FEMS Microbiol Lett 24:203–205Google Scholar
  17. Spencer JFT, Spencer DM (1982) The use of mitochondrial mutants in the isolation of hybrids involving industrial yeast strains. III. Restoration of mitochondrial function in petites of industrial yeast strains by fusion with respiratory competent protoplasts of other yeast species. Curr Genet 4:177–180Google Scholar
  18. Stahl U (1978) Zygote formation and recombination between like making types in the yeast (Saccharomycopsis lipolytica) by protoplast fusion. Mol Gen Genet 160:111–113Google Scholar
  19. Stewart GG (1981a) The place of yeast in biotechnology. Ind J Microbiol 21:171–210Google Scholar
  20. Stewart GG (1981b) The genetic manipulation of industrial yeast strains. Can J Microbiol 27:973–990Google Scholar
  21. Whittaker PA, Leach SM (1978) Interspecific hybrid production between the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis and K. fragilis by protoplast fusion. Fed Eur Microbiol Soc Microbiol Lett 4:31–34Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. T. Evans
    • 1
  • D. Conrad
    • 1
  1. 1.Allelix Inc.MississaugaCanada

Personalised recommendations