Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of pipradrol hydrochloride and sodium amylobarbitone on operant responding in a discrimination situation

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Data were collected on the effects of pipradrol hydrochloride and sodium amylobarbitone on operant responding by rats in a discrimination situation.

It was found that pipradrol caused a marked increase in the animals' general excitement and interfered with eating behaviour, especially in the 10 mg/kg dose. It also greatly increased the variability of response rates. In the 10 mg/kg dose pipradrol tended to abolish bar-pressing behaviour, but this effect did not appear until two or three days' testing under this drug had taken place. In the 5 mg/kg dose pipradrol greatly increased response rates. In both doses it drastically reduced the subjects' ability to discriminate SD from SΔ. Amylobarbitone had much less marked effects than pipradrol, but what effects it did have tended to be in the same direction as those produced by this drug. Thus, it tended to increase response rates and decrease the discrimination ratio. Changes in the drug effects as a function of day of testing and drive level are also decribed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belleville, R. E.: Control of behaviour by drug-produced internal stimuli. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 5, 95–105 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadhurst, P. L.: Application of biometrical genetics to the inheritance of behaviour. In Experiments in Personality, Vol. 1. Psychogenetics and Psychopharmacology. Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.). pp. 3–102. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, D.: Behavioural effects of amphetamine-barbiturate combinations. Paper read at a meeting of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour Group held on Jan. 9th, 1964.

  • Dinsmoor, J. A.: The effect of periodic reinforcement of bar-pressing in the presence of a discriminative stimulus. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 44, 354–361 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Faidherbe, J., M. Richelle, and J. Schlag: Non-consumption of the reinforcer under drug action. J. exp. Anal. Behav. 5, 521–524 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferster, C. B., and B. F. Skinner: Schedules of Reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A.: The effects of pipradrol, amylobarbitone and drive on the relationship between SD intensity and operant response rate (to bepublished).

  • — (Ed.): Pavlov's Typology: Recent Theoretical and Experimental Developments from the Laboratory of B. M. Teplov. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, G. E., Jr.: Genetic strains and stocks. In Methodology in Mammalian Genetics. (Pp. 83–126). W. J. Burdette (Ed.) San Francisco: Holden-Day, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnard, W. J., Jr., and C. J. Carr: A preliminary procedure for the evaluation of central nervous system depressants. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 121, 354–361 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, I. P.: Conditioned Reflexes. Translated by G. V. Anrep. Oxford: University Press 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, C. C., Jr.: The relation between conditioned stimulus intensity and response strength. J. exp. Psychol. 46, 225–231 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, G.W., W. Cutting, and A. Furst: Comparison of excited phases after sedatives and tranquillizers. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 1, 346–350 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, Ruth, and Hannah Steinberg: Mutual potentiation of amphetamine and amylobarbitone measured by activity in rats. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 21, 295–305 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, Hannah, Ruth Rushton, and Christine Tinson: Modification of the effects of an amphetamine-barbiturate mixture by the past experience of rats. Nature (Lond.) 192, 533–535 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teplov, B. M.: Problems in the study of general types of higher nervous activity in animals and man. In Pavlov's Typology: Recent Theoretical and Experimental Developments from the Laboratory of B. M. Teplov. J. A. Gray (Ed.). Oxford: Pergamon Press 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H. W., Barbara B. Brown, C. R. Thompson, and J. K. Smith: Pharmacologic evaluation of a new central stimulant α-(2-Piperidyl) benzyhydrol hydrochloride (DOL or MRD-108). Cincinnatti: Research Laboratories, Wm. S. Merrel Co. 1952.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by grants from the Bethlem Royal and Maudsley Hospitals' Research Fund and the Wellcome Trust. I am very grateful to Mr. H. Hurwitz for his generous provision of facilities in the Animal Behaviour Laboratory at Birkbeck College, as well as for his many helpful suggestions, and to Dr. P. L. Broadhurst for his supervision, advice and criticism. Dr. D. Joyce gave me valuable advice on the doses and timing of the drug administrations. I also wish to thank Mr. A. Hendrickson for his help with the computer programming of the statistical analyses and Miss N. Hemsley and Mrs. V. Beevers for other help with the computations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gray, J.A. The effects of pipradrol hydrochloride and sodium amylobarbitone on operant responding in a discrimination situation. Psychopharmacologia 6, 417–434 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00429569

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00429569

Keywords

Navigation