Summary
Conflict behavior was induced in rats by simultaneously rewarding with liquid food and punishing with pain shock every lever response made in the presence of a tone. Meprobamate, phenobarbital and pentobarbital increased the number of shocks a rat would accept in order to obtain the food reward; in contrast, promazine and d-amphetamine decreased the number of shocks taken. The technique thus permits a separation on a behavioral basis of meprobamate, pentobarbital and phenobarbital from promazine and d-amphetamine.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Conger, J. J.: The effects of alcohol on conflict behavior in the albino rat. Quart. J. Stud. Alcohol 12, 1–29 (1951).
Fazekas, J. F.: Convulsant action of phenothiazine derivatives. J. Amer. med. Ass. 165, 1241 (1957).
Ferster, C. B., and B. F. Skinner: Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts 1957.
Jacobsen, E.: In: Psychotropic Drugs (S. Garattini and V. Ghetti eds.). Milan: Elsevier 1957.
Kurtzke, J. F.: Seizures with promazine. J. nerv. ment. Dis. 125, 119 (1957).
Masserman, J. H., and K. S. Yum: An analysis of the influence of alcohol on experimental neurosis in cats. Psychosom. Med. 8, 36–52 (1946).
Miller, N. E.: In: Psychotropic Drugs (S. Garattini and V. Ghetti eds.). Milan: Elsevier 1957.
Naess, K., and Wulff Rasmussen: Approach-withdrawal responses and other specific behavior reactions as screening test for tranquillizers. Acta Pharmacol. (Kbh.) 15, 99–114 (1958).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geller, I., Seifter, J. The effects of meprobamate, barbiturates, d-amphetamine and promazine on experimentally induced conflict in the rat. Psychopharmacologia 1, 482–492 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00429273
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00429273