Advertisement

Psychopharmacologia

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 239–244 | Cite as

Fenfluramine and N-ethyl amphetamine: Comparison of the reinforcing and rate-decreasing actions in the rhesus monkey

  • Richard E. Tessel
  • James H. Woods
Animal Studies

Abstract

N-ethyl amphetamine HCl (NEA) and fenfluramine HCl (meta-trifluoromethyl N-ethyl amphetamine) were evaluated as reinforcers in rhesus monkeys that had been previously trained to press a lever using food presentations and cocaine HCl injections as reinforcers. Each daily session consisted of episodic opportunities to obtain reinforcers under a fixed-ratio schedule of 30. A drug period was interpolated between two periods in which lever-press responding was maintained by food presentations. Compared to saline, none of the drugs altered the rate of responding in the food periods which preceded the drug sessions, indicating the absence of residual response-disrupting drug actions from previous sessions. However, NEA and fenfluramine self-injection resulted in dose-related decreases in response rates during the food periods which immediately followed the drug sessions. Cocaine HCl (30 Μg/kg/injection) maintained high response rates at over one response/second during the drug periods, as did the same dose of NEA. Doses of 10 and 100 Μg/kg/injection of NEA as well as all doses of fenfluramine HCl (10 through 300 Μg/kg/injection) maintained rates that were not different from those associated with saline injections. These results substantiate and extend earlier findings with fenfluramine and indicate that its failure to act as a reinforcer is attributable to its meta-trifluoromethyl group.

Key words

N-Ethyl Amphetamine Fenfluramine Cocaine Self-Administration Operant Conditioning Rhesus Monkeys 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adkins, D. C.: Statistics. Columbus: Merrill Books 1964Google Scholar
  2. Babulova, A., Cotillo, P., Bonaccorsi, A., Podvalova, I.: Effects of fenfluramine on the adrenergic system. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 24, 886–893 (1972)Google Scholar
  3. Balster, R. L., Schuster, C. R.: A comparison of d-amphetamine, l-amphetamine, and methamphetamine self-administration in rhesus monkeys. Pharmacol., Biochem. and Behav. 1, 71–76 (1973)Google Scholar
  4. Baxter, B. L., Gluckman, M. I., Scerni, R.: Differential self-injection behavior produced by fenfluramine versus other appetite inhibiting drugs. Fed. Proc. 32, 754 (1973)Google Scholar
  5. Bizzi, A., Bonaccorsi, A., Jespersen, S., Jori, A., Garattini, S.: Pharmacological studies on amphetamine and fenfluramine. In: Amphetamines and related compounds, E. Costa and S. Garattini, eds., pp. 577–596. New York: Raven Press 1970Google Scholar
  6. Deneau, G., Yanagita, T., Seevers, M. H.: Self-administration of psychoactive substances by the monkey. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 16, 30–48 (1969)Google Scholar
  7. Le Douarec, J. C., Neveu, C.: Pharmacology and biochemistry of fenfluramine. In: Amphetamines and related compounds, E. Costa and S. Garattini, eds., pp. 75–105. New York: Raven Press 1970Google Scholar
  8. Downs, D. A., Woods, J. H.: Codeine- and cocaine-reinforced responding in rhesus monkeys: effects of dose on response rates under a fixed-ratio schedule. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 191, 179–188 (1974)Google Scholar
  9. Goldberg, S. R.: Comparable behavior maintained under fixed-ratio and second-order schedules of food presentation, cocaine injection or d-amphetamine injection in the squirrel monkey. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 186, 18–30 (1973)Google Scholar
  10. Götestam, K. G., Andersson, B. E.: Self-administration of amphetamine analogues in rats. Pharmacol., Biochem. and Behav. (in press, 1975)Google Scholar
  11. Pickens, R., Thompson, T.: Cocaine-reinforced behavior in rats: Effects of reinforcement magnitude and fixed-ratio size. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 161, 122–129 (1968)Google Scholar
  12. Tessel, R. E., Woods, J. H., Counsell, R. E., Basmadjian, G. P.: Structure-activity relationships between meta-substituted N-ethyl amphetamines and isolated guinea-pig atrial rate. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 192, 319–326 (1975a)Google Scholar
  13. Tessel, R. E., Woods, J. H., Counsell, R. E., Lu, M.: Structure-activity relationships between meta-substituted N-ethyl amphetamines and locomotor activity in mice. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 192, 310–318 (1975b)Google Scholar
  14. Wilson, M. C., Hitomi, M., Schuster, C. R.: Psychomotor-stimulant self-administration as a function of dosage per injection in the rhesus monkey. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 22, 271–281 (1971)Google Scholar
  15. Woods, J. H., Tessel, R. E.: Fenfluramine: amphetamine congener that fails to maintain drug-taking behavior in the rhesus monkey. Science 185, 1067–1069 (1974)Google Scholar
  16. Woodward, E.: Clinical experience with fenfluramine in the United States. In: Amphetamines and related compounds, E. Costa and S. Garattini, eds., pp. 685–691. New York: Raven Press 1970Google Scholar
  17. Yokel, R. A., Pickens, R.: Self-administration of optical isomers of amphetamine and methyl amphetamine by rats. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 187, 27–33 (1973)Google Scholar
  18. Yokel, R. A., Pickens, R.: Drug level of d- and l-amphetamine during intravenous self-administration. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 34, 255–264 (1974)Google Scholar
  19. Ziance, R. J., Sipes, I. G., Kinnard, W. J., Buckley, J. P.: Central nervous system effects of fenfluramine hydrochloride. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 180, 110–117 (1972)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard E. Tessel
    • 1
  • James H. Woods
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Pharmacology and PsychologyThe University of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations