Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of drugs on the acquisition of stimulus control in a conditioned suppression procedure

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rats were trained to press a lever under a variable-interval (VI) schedule of water reinforcement. After stable responding had developed, a 4.5-KHz tone (CS) was conditioned classically to a 2.5-mA electric shock (US) in groups of animals which had been given various psychoactive drugs or saline. Twenty-four hours later, a stimulus generalization test was conducted in the absence of drug; during this session, tones that varied in frequency around 4.5 KHz were presented while the animals were responding under the VI schedule. In animals conditioned under saline, all tones (non-differentially) suppressed responding which, however, recovered gradually over time. This suppressive effect was eliminated by lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD; 0.2 and 0.32 mg/kg), cocaine (20 mg/kg), diazepam (2.5 mg/kg), lisuride (0.08 mg/kg), mescaline (20 mg/kg) and 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (4 mg/kg), and was attenuated by amphetamine (4 mg/kg), pentobarbital (15 mg/kg) and morphine (4 mg/kg). Atropine (10 mg/kg), scopolamine (1 mg/kg), clonazepam (0.5 mg/kg), and chlorpromazine (4 mg/kg) did not alter the suppressive effect of the tone. The serotonin antagonist BC-105 (6 mg/kg) reversed the effect of 0.2 mg/kg of LSD. These results suggest (1) that drug-induced stimuli may “overshadow” other (e.g., external) stimuli during classical conditioning and, (2) that drugs might affect behavior by altering processes (stimulus control or others) that do not simultaneously involve response or motor control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appel JB, Dykstra LA (1977) Drugs, discrimination, and signal detection theory. In: Thompson T, Dews PB (eds) Advances in behavioral pharamcology (Vol 1). Academic Press, New York, pp 140–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Beninger RJ, Mason ST, Philips AG, Fibiger HC (1980) The use of conditioned suppression to evaluate the nature of neuroleptic-induced avoidance deficits. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 213:623–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC (1977a) Drug-induced cues and states: Some theoretical and methodological inferences. In: Lal H (ed) Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs. Plenum Press, New York, pp 5–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC (1977b) Discriminative stimulus properties of benzodiazepines and barbiturates. In: Lal H (ed) Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs. Plenum Press, New York, pp 93–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC, Slangen JL (1982) Drug discrimination: Applications in CNS pharmacology. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykstra LA, Appel JB (1972) Lysergic acid diethylamide and stimulus generalization: Rate dependent effects. Science 177:720–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Eschenhof E (1973) Untersuchungen über das Schicksal des Antikonvulsivums Clonazepam im Organismus der Ratte, des Hundes und des Menschen. Arzneim Forsch 23:390–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes WK, Skinner BF (1941) Some quantitative properties of anxiety. J Exp Psychol 29:390–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Grilly DM, Genovese RF, Nowak MJ (1980) Effects of morphine, d-amphetamine, and pentobarbital on shock and light discrimination perfromance in rats. Psychopharmacology 70:213–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Grilly DM (1981) A signal detection analysis of morphine effects on the response bias of rats in a two-shock discrimination task. Life Sci 28:1882–1888

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise GA, Nellie LL (1970) Effects of scopolamine, atropine and d-amphetamine on internal and external control of responding on non-reinforced trials. Psychopharmacologia 18:38–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez L, Appel JB (1979) An analysis of some perceptual effects of morphine, chlorpromazine, and LSD. Psychopharmacology 60:125–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzman SG, Shannon H, Schaefer GJ (1977) Discriminative properties of narcotic antagnoists. In: Lal H (ed) Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs. Plenum Press, New York, pp 23–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Houser VP (1978) The effects of drugs on behavior controlled by aversive stimuli. In: Blackman DE, Sanger DJ (eds) Contemporary research in behavioral pharmacology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 69–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Koek W, Slangen JL (1983) Effects of d-amphetamine and morphine on discrimination: Signal detection analysis and assessment of response repetition in the performance deficits. Psychopharmacology 80:125–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisr C, Slifer B (1982) Drug effects on discrimination performance at two levels of stimulus control. Psychopharmacology 76:286–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn DM, White FJ, Appel JB (1977) Discriminative stimulus properties of hallucinogens: Behavioral assay of drug action. In: Lal H (ed) Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs. Plenum Press, New York, pp 137–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal H (1977) Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon M, Robbins TW (1975) The action of central nervous stimulant drugs: A general theory concerning amphetamine effects. In: Essman W, Valzelli L (eds) Current developments in psychopharmacology, vol 2, Spectrum Publications Inc., New York, pp 89–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Milar KS (1981) Cholinergic drug effects on visual discriminations: A signal detection analysis. Psychopharmacology 74:383–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles CG (1969) A demonstration of overshadowing in operant conditioning. Psychonom Sci 16:139–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima T, Egawa E, Kuruma I (1981) Ex vivo 3H-spiroperidol binding to rat striatum and the inhibitory effects of neuroleptics. Jpn J Pharmacol 31:159–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen EB (1981) Effects of d-amphetamine and LSD on simultaneous discrimination. In: Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E, Lowe CF (eds) Quantification of steady-state operant behavior. Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, pp 461–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen EB, Appel JB (1983) The effects of drugs on the discrimination of color following a variable delay-period: A signal detection analysis. Psychopharmacology 80:24–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen EB, Valentine JD, Holohean AM, Appel JB (1983) Benzodiazepine receptor mediated discriminative cues: Effects of GABA-ergic drugs and inverse agonists. Life Sci 33:2213–2220

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA (1966) State-dependent learning produced by depressant and atropine-like drugs. Psychopharmacologia 10:6–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA (1971) Discriminative control of behavior by drug states. In: Thompson T, Pickens R (eds) Stimulus properties of drugs. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 87–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA (1982) Comparison of the degree of discriminability of various drugs using the T-maze drug discrimination paradigm. Psychopharmacology 76:385–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinder RM, Brodgen RN, Speight TM, Avery GS (1976) Clonazepam: A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in epilepsy. Drugs 12:321–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosecrans JA, Glennon RA (1979) Drug-induced cues in studying mechanism of drug action. Neuropharmacology 18:981–989

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman PB, Ho BT (1977) Characterization of discriminative response control by psychomotor stimulants. In: Lal H (ed) Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs. Plenum Press, New York, pp 107–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson DM (1978) Stimulus control and drug effects. In: Blackman DE, Sanger DJ (eds) Contemporary research in behavioral pharmacology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 159–208

    Google Scholar 

  • White FJ, Appel JB (1982a) The role of dopamine and serotonin in the discriminative stimulus effects of lisuride. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 221:421–427

    Google Scholar 

  • White FJ, Appel JB (1982b) Training dose as a factor in LSD-saline discrimination. Psychopharmacology 76:20–25

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nielsen, E.B., Appel, J.B. The effect of drugs on the acquisition of stimulus control in a conditioned suppression procedure. Psychopharmacology 85, 80–86 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427327

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427327

Key words

Navigation