Geotechnical & Geological Engineering

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 219–239 | Cite as

Tunnel blasting techniques in difficult ground conditions

  • A. K. Chakraborty
  • J. L. Jethwa


The quality of tunnelling can be improved by proper blast design which takes into account the rock mass conditions. The effects of different rock mass properties on tunnel blast performance need to be assessed. The strength of the formation and joint orientation critically affected fragmentation and overbreak in a model study of blasting. Similar effects were noted in situ when the performance of a blast pattern in different rock mass conditions in the Tandsi inclines (Bihar, India) were analysed. Accordingly, the on-going blast pattern was modified for the poor ground conditions prevailing in the rest of the inclines. Improved fragmentation and smooth profile were obtained as a result; the rate of drivage improved considerably and the cost of excavation was reduced. Based on the observations in the model studies and the investigations at Tandsi, some guidelines for optimum blast design in difficult ground conditions are suggested.


Tunnel blasting techniques geology and blast patterns blast performance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. BartonN., LienL. and LundeJ. (1974) Analysis of Rock Mass Quality and Support Practice in Tunnelling, and a Guide for Estimating Support Requirements, Internal Report of Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo, pp. 6–9.Google Scholar
  2. Bhasin, M.L. (1992) Mechanised drifting at Tandsi Project, unpublished report.Google Scholar
  3. Bhat, H.S. (1991) Time and cost control in tunnelling and other underground works—some suggestions, in Workshop on Tunnels, Mine Roadways and Caverns, Ooty, September, pp. II-25–II-36.Google Scholar
  4. Chakraborty, A.K., Jethwa, J.L. and Paithanker, A.G. (1990) Factors affecting blast performance in tunnels — a case study, in Proceedings of the National Seminar on Modern Trends in Explosives Technology and Application, Nagpur, pp. 116–131.Google Scholar
  5. ChakrabortyA.K., PaithankarA.G. and JethwaJ.L. (1991) Influence of joint directions on tunnel blasting — a model study, Indian Mining and Engineering Journal, 30, (October), 25–30.Google Scholar
  6. Chakraborty, A.K., Paithankar, A.G. and Jethwa, J.L. (1993) Computer aided blast design for tunnels, in 9th Annual Symposium on Explosives and Blasting Research, California, USA, Jan 31–Feb 4, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
  7. FourneyW.L. (1988) Fragmentation Studies with Large Flaws, Rock Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 2, Technical University of Vienna, Vienna, pp. 341–52.Google Scholar
  8. Ghose, A.K. (1988) Design of drilling and blasting subsystems — a rock mass classification approach, in Proc. Mine Planning and Equipment Selection, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 335–40.Google Scholar
  9. Hagan. T.N. (1992) Safe and Cost Efficient Drilling and Blasting for Tunnels, Caverns, Shafts and Raises in India, Manual prepared by Golder Associates Pvt. Ltd, Australia.Google Scholar
  10. Jethwa, J.L. (1991) Faster tunnelling operations — what must be done, in Workshop on Tunnels, Mine Roadways and Caverns, Ooty, September, pp. III-1–III-24.Google Scholar
  11. JethwaJ.L. et al. (1990) Productivity and Controlling Blast Damage in Tandsi Inclines—Preliminary Investigations and Feasibility Report, Prepared for Western Coalfields Limited, Central Mining Research Station, Dhanbad.Google Scholar
  12. Langefors and Kihlstrom, (1973) The Modern Technique of Rock Blasting, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 180–257.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. K. Chakraborty
    • 1
  • J. L. Jethwa
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Mining Research Station UnitNagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations