Advertisement

Psychopharmacology

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 225–234 | Cite as

Effects of morphine alone and in combination with naloxone or d-amphetamine on shock-maintained behavior in the squirrel monkey

  • L. D. Byrd
Animal Studies

Abstract

Key-pressing behavior in the squirrel monkey was maintained under an 8-min fixed-interval (FI) schedule of electric-shock delivery. The acute i.m. administration of morphine prior to a daily session decreased response rates at doses of 1.0–3.0 mg/kg but had little systematic effect on rate at doses of 0.03–0.3 mg/kg. When naloxone was administered concomitantly with morphine prior to a session, 0.01 mg/kg naloxone required a three-fold increase in the dose of morphine necessary to obtain decreased response rates, 0.1 mg/kg naloxone required a 30-fold increase in morphine, and 1.0 mg/kg required more than a 30-fold increase in morphine. Moreover, the administration of naloxone with morphine resulted in increased rates of responding at certain combinations of doses of the two drugs. The administration of d-amphetamine (0.03 or 0.1 mg/kg) alone increased mean response rates under the FI schedule; when combined with 0.03–0.3 mg/kg morphine the increases in responding were greater than obtained with d-amphetamine alone. The negative slope of the linear regression lines relating the effects of morphine to control rates of responding engendered under the FI schedule was decreased when morphine was combined with naloxone, but not with d-amphetamine. These results show that naloxone, but not d-amphetamine, can antagonize the response-rate decreasing effect of morphine when responding in the squirrel monkey is maintained by response-produced electric shock.

Key words

Morphine Naloxone d-Amphetamine Schedule-controlled behavior FI schedule Squirrel monkeys 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, W. J., Lorens, S. A., Mitchell, C. L.: Morphine enhances lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation in the rat. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 140, 770–771 (1972)Google Scholar
  2. Byrd, L. D.: Responding in the cat maintained under responseindependent electric shock and response-produced electric shock. J. exp. Anal. Behav. 12, 1–10 (1969)Google Scholar
  3. Byrd, L. D.: Responding in the squirrel monkey under secondorder schedules of shock delivery. J. exp. Anal. Behav. 18, 155–167 (1972)Google Scholar
  4. Byrd, L. D.: Contrasting effects of morphine on schedule-controlled behavior in the chimpanzee and baboon. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 193, 861–869 (1975)Google Scholar
  5. Cook, L., Catania, A. C.: Effects of drugs on avoidance and escape behavior. Fed. Proc. 23, 818–835 (1964)Google Scholar
  6. Cook, L., Kelleher, R. T.: Drug effects on the behavior of animals. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 96, 315–335 (1962)Google Scholar
  7. Davis, J. L.: Antagonism of a behavioral effect of d-amphetamine by chlorpromazine in the pigeon. J. exp. Anal. Behav. 8, 325–327 (1965)Google Scholar
  8. Dews, P. B.: Studies on behavior. IV. Stimulant actions of methamphetamine. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 122, 137–147 (1958)Google Scholar
  9. Dykstra, L. A., McMillan, D. E., Harris, L. S.: Antagonism of morphine by long acting narcotic antagonists. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 39, 151–162 (1974)Google Scholar
  10. Fingl, E., Woodbury, M. D.: General principles. In: The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. L. S. Goodman and A. Gilman, eds., pp. 1–36. New York: McMillan 1965.Google Scholar
  11. Goldberg, S. R., Morse, W. H., Goldberg, D. M.: Some behavioral effects of morphine, naloxone and nalorphine in the squirrel monkey and the pigeon. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther 196, 625–635 (1976)Google Scholar
  12. Gollub, L. R.: The relations among measures of performance on fixed-interval schedules. J. exp. Anal. Behav. 7, 337–343 (1964)Google Scholar
  13. Goth, A.: Medical pharmacology. Saint Louis: Mosby 1974Google Scholar
  14. Hake, D. F., Azrin, N. H.: An apparatus for delivering pain shock to monkeys. J. exp. Anal. Behav. 6, 297–298 (1963)Google Scholar
  15. Herrnstein, R. J., Morse, W. H.: Effects of pentobarbital on intermittently reinforced behavior. Science 125, 929–931 (1957)Google Scholar
  16. Holtzman, S. G.: Behavioral effects of separate and combined administration of naloxone and d-amphetamine. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 189, 51–60 (1974)Google Scholar
  17. Holtzman, S. G.: Effects of morphine and narcotic antagonists on avoidance behavior of the squirrel monkey. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 196, 145–155 (1976)Google Scholar
  18. Holtzman, S. G., Jewett, R. E.: Interactions of morphine and nalorphine with physostigmine on operant behavior in the rat. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 22, 384–395 (1971)Google Scholar
  19. Holtzman, S. G., Jewett, R. E.: Shock intensity as a determinant of the behavioral effects of morphine in the rat. Life Sci. 11, 1085–1091 (1972)Google Scholar
  20. Kelleher, R. T., Gill, C. A., Riddle, W. C., Cook, L.: On the use of the squirrel monkey in behavioral and pharmacological experiments. J. exp. Anal. Behav. 6, 249–252 (1963)Google Scholar
  21. Kelleher, R. T., Morse, W. H.: Escape behavior and punished behavior. Fed. Proc. 23, 808–816 (1964)Google Scholar
  22. Kelleher, R. T., Morse, W. H.: Determinants of the specificity of behavioral effects of drugs. Ergebn. Physiol. 60, 1–56 (1968)Google Scholar
  23. McKearney, J. W.: Maintenance of responding under a fixedinterval schedule of electric shock-presentation. Science 160, 1249–1251 (1968)Google Scholar
  24. McKearney, J. W.: Fixed-interval schedules of electric shock presentation: extinction and recovery of performance under different shock intensities and fixed-interval durations. J. exp. Anal. Behav. 12, 301–313 (1969)Google Scholar
  25. McKearney, J. W.: Effects of d-amphetamine, morphine and chlorpromazine on responding under fixed-interval schedules of food presentation or electric shock presentation. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 190, 141–153 (1974)Google Scholar
  26. McKearney, J. W.: Effects of morphine, methadone, nalorphine and naloxone on responding under fixed-interval (FI) schedules in the squirrel monkey. Fed. Proc. 34, 766 (1975)Google Scholar
  27. McMillan, D. E.: Some interactions between sympathomimetic amines and amine-depleting agents on the schedule-controlled behavior of the pigeon and the squirrel monkey. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 163, 172–187 (1968)Google Scholar
  28. McMillan, D. E., Morse, W. H.: Some effects of morphine and morphine antagonists on schedule-controlled behavior. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 157, 175–184 (1967)Google Scholar
  29. McMillan, D. E., Wolf, P. S., Carchman, R. A.: Antagonism of the behavioral effects of morphine and methadone by narcotic antagonists in the pigeon. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 175, 443–458 (1970)Google Scholar
  30. Sanger, D. J., Blackman, D. E.: Rate-dependent effects of drugs: A review of the literature. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 4, 73–83 (1976)Google Scholar
  31. Sidman, M.: Avoidance conditioning with brief shock and no exteroceptive warning signal. Science 118, 35–48 (1953)Google Scholar
  32. Smith, C. B.: Effects of d-amphetamine upon operant behavior of pigeons: enhancement by reserpine. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 146, 167–174 (1964)Google Scholar
  33. Thompson, T., Trombley, J., Luke, D., Lott, D.: Effects of morphine on behavior maintained by four simple food-reinforcement schedules. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 17, 182–192 (1970)Google Scholar
  34. Tsou, K.: Effects of morphine upon several types of operant conditionings in the rat. Acta physiol. sinica 26, 143–150 (1963)Google Scholar
  35. Verhave, T., Owen, J. E. Jr., Robbins, E. B.: The effect of morphine sulfate on avoidance and escape behavior. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther 125, 148–251 (1959)Google Scholar
  36. Weiss, B., Laties, V. G.: Analgesic effects in monkeys of morphine, nalorphine, and a benzomorphan narcotic antagonist. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 143, 169–173 (1964)Google Scholar
  37. Woods, J. H.: Effects of morphine, methadone and codeine on schedule-controlled behavior in the pigeon. Fed. Proc. 28, 511 (1969)Google Scholar
  38. Woods, J. H., Schuster, C. R.: Opiates as reinforcing stimuli. In: Stimulus properties of drugs. T. Thompson and R. Pickens, eds., pp. 163–175. New York Appleton-Century-Crofts 1971Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. D. Byrd
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Psychobiology, Department of PsychiatryHarvard Medical School at the New England Regional Primate Research CenterSouthborough

Personalised recommendations