Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of ethanol, pentobarbital, and phenobarbital using drug vs. drug discrimination training

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rats learned drug vs. drug (D vs. D) or drug vs. no drug (D vs. N) discriminations in a T-maze shock-escape task with various doses of pentobarbital, phenobarbital, or ethanol. Dose-effect curves were obtained for each drug using D vs. N training. After D vs. N training with any one of these drugs, rats made D choices during substitution tests with the other two drugs, suggesting drug interchangeability. D vs. D training also showed that pentobarbital and phenobarbital were virtually indistinguishable from one another. However, ethanol was readily discriminated from pentobarbital, showing that the two drugs differed. The results show the utility of D vs. D training as a method for studying drug differences that may be too small to detect with substitution tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barry, H., III: Classification of drugs according to their discriminable effects in rats. Fed. Proc.33, 1814–1824 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, H., III, Krimmer, E. C.: Pentobarbital effects perceived by rats as resembling several other depressants but not alcohol. Proc. 80th Am. Psychol. Assoc. 7, 849–850 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, H., III, Krimmer, E. C.: Discriminable stimuli produced by alcohol and other CNS depressants. In: Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs, H. Lal, ed. New York: Plenum Press (in press, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno, O. F. A., Carlini, E. A., Finkelfarb, E., Suzuki, J. S.: Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, ethanol, and amphetamine as discriminative stimuli; generalization tests with other drugs. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 46, 235–243 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. L.: Statistical Methods. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1967

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschhorn, I. D., Winter, J. C.: Mescaline and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) as discriminative stimuli. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 22, 64–71 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krimmer, E. C., Barry, H., III: Differential stimulus characteristics of alcohol and pentobarbital in rats. Proc. Am. Psychol. Assoc. 8, 1005–1006 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, D. A.: State-dependent learning produced by depressant and atropine-like drugs. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 10, 6–31 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, D. A.: Experimental methods for the study of state-dependent learning. Fed. Proc. 33, 1800–1813 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, D. A.: A comparison of the discriminable CNS effects of ketamine, phencyclidine, and pentobarbital. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. 215, 180–189 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Overton, D.A. Comparison of ethanol, pentobarbital, and phenobarbital using drug vs. drug discrimination training. Psychopharmacology 53, 195–199 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00426492

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00426492

Key words

Navigation