Abstract
System robustness is defined as a system's capability of adjusting its operation to accommodate changes in design conditions. To measure a system's performance under changes in the design conditions, an operation model is proposed. A robustness index in terms of the dual variables associated with the resource constraints of the operation model is suggested. For illustrating the proposed methodology, a simple example of a hypothetical agricultural expansion is used. Via a planning model, planning alternatives for this example are generated. Performance of the alternative plans measured in terms of achieved net benefits, and their robustness under various conditions of resource inputs, are determined. The conflict between system performance and robustness is investigated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allam, M. N. and Marks, D. H., 1983, Comment on robustness of water resource systems, Water Resour. Res. 19, 1327–1328.
Allam, M. N. and Marks, D. H., 1984, Irrigated agricultural expansion planning in developing countries: income redistribution objective, Water Resour. Res. 20, 767–774.
Eastern Software Products, Inc., 1984, LPX 88 User's Guide, P.O. Box 15328, Alexandria, Virginia, U.S.A.
Fiering, M. B., 1982, A screening model to quantify resilience, Water Resour. Res. 18, 27–32.
Fiering, M. B. and Holling, C. S., 1974, Management and standards for perturbed ecosystems, Agro-Ecosystems, 1, 201–321.
Hashimota, T., Loucks, D. P., and Stedinger, J. R., 1982, Robustness of water resource systems, Water Resour. Res. 18, 21–26.
Matalas, N. C., and Fiering, M. B., 1977, Water-resource systems planning, in Climate, Climatic Change and Water Supply, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.
Stigler, G., 1939, Production and distribution in the short run, J. Pol. Econ., 47, 305–327.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allam, M.N., Abu-Riziaiza, O.S. Quantification of robustness in water resource systems. Water Resour Manage 2, 231–243 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00424656
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00424656