Reading and Writing

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 45–59 | Cite as

A study of handwriting in written stories of normal and learning disabled children

  • Doris J. Johnson
  • Joanne F. Carlisle
Article

Abstract

Written stories of normally achieving and learning disabled children in grades one through three were compared, using a Handwriting Evaluation Scale designed for this study. The subjects also were given tests for receptive language, figure copying and spelling. The Non-LD and LD groups differed on figure copying, spelling and written productivity, but not receptive language. The Non-LD grade level groups differed significantly on two components of the handwriting scale (Letter Size and Control), while the LD grade level groups differed on three components (Letter Formation, Alignment and Spacing, and Letter Size). The most pronounced differences between the LD and normally achieving children were on Formation and Size. A separate analysis of the third grade stories revealed that handwriting was less related to productivity than spelling and visual-motor skills. Nevertheless, the results indicated that many LD students have weak visual-spatial-motor skills. Implications for intervention are discussed.

Key words

Elementary years Figure copying Handwriting Learning disabilities Story writing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alston, J. & Taylor, J. (1987). Handwriting: Theory, research and practice. New York: Nichols Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  2. Bain, A. (1991). Handwriting disorders In: A. Bain, L. Bailet, & L. Moats (eds.), Written language disorders: Theory into practice (pp. 43–64). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  3. Beery, K. (1982). Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration. Cleveland, OH: Modern Curriculum Press.Google Scholar
  4. de Ajuriaguerra, J. & Auzias, M. (1975). Preconditions for the development of writing in the child. In: E.H. Lenneberg & E. Lenneberg (eds.), Foundations of language development: A multidisciplinary approach, Vol. 2 (pp. 311–328). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dunn, L.M. & Dunn, L.M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  6. Frostig, M. & Horne, D. (1964). The Frostig program for the development of visual perception. Chicago, IL: Follett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  7. Furner, B.A. (1983). Developing handwriting ability: A perceptual learning process, Topics in Learning & Learning Disabilities 3: 41–54.Google Scholar
  8. Gardner, H. (1980). Artful scribbles. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Graham, S. (1986). The reliability, validity, and utility of three handwriting measurement procedures, Journal of Educational Research 79: 373–380.Google Scholar
  10. Graham, S. & Miller, L. (1980). Handwriting research and practice: A unified approach, Focus on Exceptional Children 13(2): 1–16.Google Scholar
  11. Grill, J. & Kirwin, M. (1989). Written Language Assessment (WLA). Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Hamstra-Bletz, L. & Blote, A. (1993). A longitudinal study on dysgraphic handwriting in primary school, Journal of Learning Disabilities 26: 689–699.Google Scholar
  13. Herrick, V. & Okada, N. (1963). The present scene: Practices in the teaching of handwriting in the United States. In: V. Herrick (ed.), New horizons for research in handwriting (pp. 17–32). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  14. Johnson, D.J. (1987). Disorders of written language. In: D.J. Johnson & J.W. Blalock (eds.), Adults with learning disabilities: Clinical studies (pp. 173–204). Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, D. & Myklebust, H. (1967). Learning disabilities: Educational principles and practices. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  16. Kellogg, R. (1969). Analyzing children's art. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Kephart, N. (1960). The slow learner in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Books.Google Scholar
  18. Larsen, S. & Hammill, D. (1989). Test of Legible Handwriting. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  19. MacArthur, C. & Graham, S. (1987). Learning disabled students' composing under three methods of text production: Handwriting, word processing, and dictation, The Journal of Special Education 21: 22–42.Google Scholar
  20. Mann, P., Suiter, P. & McClung, R. (1979). Handbook in diagnostic-prescriptive teaching, Abridged, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  21. Myklebust, H.R. (1965). Development and disorders of written language, Vol. 2 New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  22. Newcomer, P. & Barenbaum, E. (1991). The written composing ability of children with learning disabilities: A review of the literature from 1980 to 1990, Journal of Learning Disabilities 23: 578–593.Google Scholar
  23. Newcomer, P., Nodine, B. & Barenbaum, E. (1988). Teaching writing to exceptional children: Reactions and recommendations. Exceptional Children 54: 559–564.Google Scholar
  24. Orton, S. (1973). Reading, writing, and speech problems in children. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  25. Strauss, A. & Lehtinen, L. (1947). Psychopathology and education of the brain-injured child, Vol. 1. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  26. Temple, C., Nathan, R. & Burris, N. (1982). The beginnings of writing Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  27. Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  28. Wilkinson, G.S. (1993). Wide Range Achievement Test-3. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Doris J. Johnson
    • 1
  • Joanne F. Carlisle
    • 1
  1. 1.Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations