Archiv für Mikrobiologie

, Volume 89, Issue 3, pp 241–245 | Cite as

Ecology of Proteus flagellar phages

  • Kathryn Krizsanovich
  • P. C. Appelbaum
  • J. N. Coetzee


Phages identical to ΦX7 in host range and serological properties are liberated by several Proteus strains. Another Proteus flagellar phage, ΦX8, differs from ΦX7 antigenically and in host range.


Host Range Proteus Serological Property Proteus Strain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Appelbaum, P. C., Hugo, H., Coetzee, J. N.: A flagellar phage for the Proteusprovidence group. J. gen. Virol. 13, 153–162 (1971).Google Scholar
  2. Bloss, L.: The relationship between two Proteus mirabilis l-forms and bacterio-phages. Arch. Mikrobiol. 45, 1–6 (1963).Google Scholar
  3. Bloss, L.: Further studies on phage reaction with spheroplasts and l-forms of Proteus mirabilis. Arch. Mikrobiol. 49, 81–85 (1964).Google Scholar
  4. Coetzee, J. N.: The characterization of a series of Proteus bacteriophages. S. Afr. J. Lab. clin. Med. 4, 147–157 (1958).Google Scholar
  5. Coetzee, J. N., Sacks, T. G.: Transduction of streptomycin resistance in Proteus mirabilis. J. gen. Microbiol. 23, 445–455 (1960).Google Scholar
  6. Dettling, H.: Einfluß eines Proteusbakteriophagen auf das Schwärmvermögen von Proteusbazillen. Arch. Hyg. (Berl.) 108, 359–364 (1932).Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, S., Meynell, G. G.: The widespread occurrence of enteric flagellar phages. J. gen. Virol. 2, 443–444 (1968).Google Scholar
  8. Joys, T. M.: Correlation between susceptibility to bacteriophage PBS1 and motility in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bact. 90, 1575–1577 (1965).Google Scholar
  9. Kauffmann, F.: Enterobacteriaceae, 1st ed. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard 1951.Google Scholar
  10. Lovett, P. S.: PBP1: a flagella specific bacteriophage mediating transduction in Bacillus pumilus. Virology 47, 743–752 (1972).Google Scholar
  11. Meynell, E. W.: A phage; ΦX which attacks motile bacteria. J. gen. Microbiol. 25, 253–290 (1961).Google Scholar
  12. Năcesco, N., Constantinesco, S. P., Petrovici, A.: Aspects électrono-optiques du phage convertisseur Proteus vulgaris 121. Arch. roum. Path. exp. 28, 838–848 (1969).Google Scholar
  13. Prozesky, O. W., de Klerk, H. C., Coetzee, J. N.: The morphology of Proteus bacteriophages. J. gen. Microbiol. 41, 29–36 (1965).Google Scholar
  14. Rima, B. K., van Kleeff, B. H. A.: Similarity of Bacillus subtilis bacteriophages PBS 1, 3 NT and I10. Some remarks on the morphology of phage heads. Antonie v. Leeuwenhoek 37, 265–274 (1971).Google Scholar
  15. Sertic, V., Boulgakov, N-A.: Bacteriophages spécifiques pour des variétés bactériennes flagellées. C. R. Soc. Biol. (Paris) 123, 887–888 (1936).Google Scholar
  16. Sukneff, W., Milaschewskaja, W., Modjaew, P.: Einfluß des Bakteriophagen auf die Biologie der Mikroorganismen. Zbl. Bakt., I. Abt. Ref. 97, 191–192 (1930).Google Scholar
  17. Takahashi, I.: Genetic transduction in Bacillus subtilis. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 5, 171–175 (1961).Google Scholar
  18. Taylor, M. J., Thorne, C. B.: Transduction of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis by each of two phages. J. Bact. 86, 452–461 (1963).Google Scholar
  19. Tyeryar, F. J., Taylor, M. J., Lawton, W. D., Goldberg, I. D.: Cotransduction and cotransformation of genetic markers in Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis. J. Bact. 100, 1027–1036 (1969).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathryn Krizsanovich
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. C. Appelbaum
    • 1
  • J. N. Coetzee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyUniversity of PretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Institute of PathologyPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations