Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of amphetamine on choice behavior of pigeons

  • Published:
Psychopharmacologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Key-pecking behavior of three pigeons was maintained by concurrent variable-interval, variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. Dose-response curves of amphetamine on four operants involved in the choice situation were obtained. None of the doses of amphetamine studied produced any rate-increasing effect on responding, irrespective of the differences in control baseline rates. Responding at the changeover key was relatively more depressed than main-key responding in spite of occuring at lower rates in non-drug conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Catania, A. C.: Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence. J. exp. Anal. Behav.6, 253–263 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, F. C.: The effect of deprivation and frequency of reinforcement on variable-interval responding. J. exp. Anal. Behav.1, 221–228 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dews, P. B.: Studies on behavior IV. Stimulant actions of metaphetamine. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther.122, 137–147 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferster, C. B., Skinner, B. F.: Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findley, J. D.: Preference and switching under concurrent scheduling. J. exp. Anal. Behav.1, 123–144 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J.: Behavioral consequences of the removal of a discriminative stimulus associated with variable interval reinforcement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University 1955.

  • —: Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J. exp. Anal. Behav.4, 267–272 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: On the law of effect. J. exp. Anal. Behav.1–3, 243–266 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, R. T., Morse, W. H.: Determinants of the specificity of behavioral effects of drugs. Ergebn. Physiol.60, 1–56 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pliskoff, S. S.: Effects of symmetrical and assymmetrical changeover delays on concurrent performances. J. exp. Anal. Behav.16, 249–256 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shull, R. L., Pliskoff, S. S.: Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures. J. exp. Anal. Behav.10, 517–527 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F.: Are theories of learning necessary? Psychol. Rev.57, 193–216 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, J. C.: Concurrent performances: effect of punishment contingent on the switching response. J. exp. Anal. Behav.16, 51–62 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. P.: Periodic reinforcement interval and number of periodic reinforcements as parameters of response strength. J. comp. physiol. Psychol.47, 51–56 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Todorov, J.C., Gorayeb, S.R.P., CorrÊa, D.L. et al. Effects of amphetamine on choice behavior of pigeons. Psychopharmacologia 26, 395–400 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00421905

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00421905

Key words

Navigation