Advertisement

Determination of the rotary flexibility of the elbow joint

  • Ch. Wagner
Article

Summary

A method of determining quantitatively the rotary flexibility of the elbow joint was developed and its reliability tested. Examinations of the left elbow joint of 100 healthy men between the ages of 18 and 72 were performed, consisting of measurements of passive supination effected by a graduated external torque as well as of active supination and pronation. The purpose of the study was to acquire a norm as basis for the functional evaluation of this joint in playing the violin. The investigation produced the following results:
  1. 1.

    The maximum active range of movement consists of about 160‡, the supinatory portion is generally higher than the pronatory, when related to a zero position with the palm of the hand in the sagittal plane.

     
  2. 2.

    The range of passive movement is non-linearly dependant on the external torque.

     
  3. 3.

    The variability of passive flexibility increases with decreasing external torque and is generally higher than the variability of active flexibility. Active pronation varies more than active supination.

     
  4. 4.

    A close positive correlation between active and passive supination is evident only when a higher torque is applied. The correlation between active supination and active pronation is only 0.33.

     
  5. 5.

    The statistically establishable reduction of flexibility through ageing is not considered to be characteristic of actual conditions. On the other hand, a broader dispersion is clearly recognizeable as the result of ageing, through a drop in the lower limit of deviation.

     

Key words

Biomechanics Flexibility of the joints Supination/Pronation Hand kinetics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Allander, E., Björnsson, O. J., ólafsson, ó., SigfÚsson, N., Thorsteinsson, J.: Normal range of joint movements in shoulder, hip, wrist and thumb with special reference to side: a comparison between two populations. Int. J. Epid. 3, 253–261 (1974)Google Scholar
  2. American Academy of Surgeons: Joint Motion. Method of Measuring and Recording (6th reprint). Edinburgh-London: Churchill Livingstone 1966Google Scholar
  3. Barter, J. T. et al.: A statistical evaluation of joint range data. Cit. Hertzberg, H. T. E.: Engineering anthropology. In: Human engineering guide to equipment design (H. P. van Cott, R. G. Kinkade, eds.). Washington: US Government Printing Office 1972Google Scholar
  4. Benninghoff, A., Goerttler, K.: Lehrbuch der Anatomie des Menschen, 1. Bd., 11. Aufl. (J. Staubesand, Hrsg.) München-Berlin-Wien: Urban & Schwarzenberg 1975Google Scholar
  5. Bugyi, B.: Beitrag zur AltersabhÄngigkeit des metakarpo-phalangealen Gelenkes des 5. Fingers. Z. Alternsforsch. 18, 24–25 (1965)Google Scholar
  6. Bunnel, S.: Die Chirurgie der Hand (deutsche übersetzung von J. Böhler). Wien-Bonn-Bern: Maudrich 1958Google Scholar
  7. Ellis, F. E., Bundick, W. R.: Cutaneous elasticity and hyperplasticity. A.M.A. Arch. Derm. 74, 22–32 (1956)Google Scholar
  8. Emmrich, R., Schwarz, J.: Die Gelenkbeweglichkeit in AbhÄngigkeit vom Altern und ihr Verhalten bei verschiedenen Krankheiten. Z. Alternsforsch. 16, 297–303 (1963)Google Scholar
  9. Fick, R.: Handbuch der Anatomie und Mechanik der Gelenke, Teil III. Jena: Fischer 1911Google Scholar
  10. Goddard, R., Dowson, D., Longfield, M. D., Wright, V.: The measurement of stiffness in human joints. Rheologica Acta 8, 229–234 (1969)Google Scholar
  11. Goddard, R., Dowson, D., Longfield, M. D., Wright, V.: Steifheit des Knies bei Gesunden und bei Arthrosepatienten. Schweiz. med. Wschr. 100, 862–867 (1970)Google Scholar
  12. Hultkrantz, J. W.: Das Ellenbogengelenk und seine Mechanik. Jena: Fischer 1897Google Scholar
  13. v. Lanz, T., Wachsmuth, W.: Praktische Anatomie. I/3 Arm, 2. Aufl. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1959Google Scholar
  14. Loebl, W. Y.: Mobility of metacarpophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis. The Hand 2, 165–169 (1973)Google Scholar
  15. McCue, B. F.: Flexibility measurements of college women. Res. Quart. Amer. Ass. Hlth phys. Educ. 24, 316–324 (1953)Google Scholar
  16. Sachs, L.: Statistische Auswertungsmethoden, 2. Aufl. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1969Google Scholar
  17. Schink, W.: Handchirurgischer Ratgeber. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1960Google Scholar
  18. Schoberth, Hanns: Die Leistungsprüfung der Bewegungsorgane. München-Berlin-Wien: Urban & Schwarzenberg 1972Google Scholar
  19. Siegelbauer, F.: Lehrbuch der normalen Anatomie des Menschen, 3. Aufl. Berlin: Urban & Schwarzenberg 1935Google Scholar
  20. Wagner, Ch.: Determination of finger flexibility. Europ. J. appl. Physiol. 32, 259–278 (1974a)Google Scholar
  21. Wagner, Ch.: Biomechanische Funktionsprüfungen der Hand. In: Neue Gesichtspunkte zu den Folgen der chronischen Polyarthritis — ihre Feststellung und Behandlung. Symposion Timmendorfer Strand 1973. Konstanz: Byk Gulden Pharmazeutika 1974bGoogle Scholar
  22. Wagner, Ch.: Physiologische Voraussetzungen für das Geigenspiel. In: Violinspiel und Violinmusik in Geschichte und Gegenwart (V. Schwartz, Hrsg.). Wien: Universal Edition 1975Google Scholar
  23. Wright, V., Johns, R. J.: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of joint stiffness in normal subjects and in patients with connective tissue diseases. Ann. rheum. Dis. 20, 36–45 (1961)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ch. Wagner
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für experimentelle MusikpÄdagogikStaatl. Hochschule für Musik und TheaterHannoverFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations