, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 93–102 | Cite as

Piracetam-induced facilitation of interhemispheric transfer of visual information in rats

  • O. Burešová
  • J. Bureš
Animal Studies


The effect of Piracetam (UCB 6215, 2-pyrrolidone-acetamide) on learning mediated by transcommissural information flow was studied in hooded rats. Acquisition of monocular pattern discrimination was faster in drug-treated rats (100 mg/kg, 30 min before training) than in untreated controls. Subsequent relearning with one hemisphere functionally eliminated by cortical spreading depression showed that the strength of the primary engram formed under Piracetam in the hemisphere contralateral to the trained eye remained unaffected but that the secondary trace (in the ipsilateral hemisphere) was considerably improved and almost equalled the primary one (savings increased from 20–30% to 50–60%). Learning with uncrossed optic fibers was unaffected by the drug. Interhemispheric transfer of lateralized visual engrams acquired during functional hemidecortication was facilitated by Piracetam administration preceding the five transfer trials performed with the untrained eye open (imperative transfer). Piracetam was ineffective when the trained eye was open during transfer trials (facultative transfer). After a visual engram had been lateralized by 5 days of monocular overtraining, Piracetam facilitated formation of the secondary engram induced by 3 interocular transfer trials. It is concluded that Piracetam enhances transcommissural encoding mechanisms activated in the initial stage of monocular learning and in some forms of interhemispheric transfer, but does not affect the transcommissural readout. This effect is interpreted as a special case of the Piracetam-induced facilitation of the phylogenetically old mechanisms of redundant information storage which improve liminal or subnormal learning.

Key words

Learning Memory Spreading depression Engram Pattern discrimination 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bryant, R. C., Petty, F., Byrne, W. L.: Effects of Piracetam (SKF 38462) on acquisition, retention, and activity in the goldfish. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 29, 121–130 (1973)Google Scholar
  2. Bureš, J., Burešová, O., KŘivánek, J.: The mechanism and applications of Leao's spreading depression of electroencephalographic activity. New York-London: Academic Press 1974Google Scholar
  3. Burešová, O., Bureš, J.: The significance of crossed and uncrossed projections for the acquisition and retrieval of visual engrams in hooded and albino rats. Psychol. Forsch. 35, 46–56 (1971a)Google Scholar
  4. Burešová, O., Bureš, J.: Interocular and interhemispheric transfer of visual engrams in callosotomized rats. Physiol. Bohemoslov. 20, 557–563 (1971b)Google Scholar
  5. Burešová, O., Bureš, J.: Drag induced facilitation of the transcommissural information flow in rats. Proc. XXV Int. Congress Physiol. Sci. Abstracts of volunteer papers, p. 90, Munich 1971cGoogle Scholar
  6. Burešová, O., Bureš, J.: Mechanisms of interhemispheric transfer of visual information in rats. Acta neurobiol. exp. 33, 673–688 (1973)Google Scholar
  7. Burešová, O., Bureš, J., Rustová, M.: Conditions for interhemispheric transfer of initially lateralized visual engrams in hooded rats. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 75, 200–205 (1971)Google Scholar
  8. Burešová, O., Nadel, L.: Interhemispheric transfer in the rats. Physiol. Behav. 5, 849–853 (1970)Google Scholar
  9. Butler, C. R.: A memory-record for visual discrimination habits produced in both cerebral hemispheres of monkey when only one hemisphere has received direct visual information. Brain Res. 10, 152–167 (1968)Google Scholar
  10. Chorover, S. L., Chase, R.: Persistance of visual pattern discrimination in binocularly-occluded albino rats. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 65, 238–245 (1968)Google Scholar
  11. Cowey, A., Parkinson, A. M.: Effects of sectioning the corpus callosum on interocular transfer in hooded rats. Exp. Brain Res. 18, 433–445 (1973)Google Scholar
  12. Doty, R. W., Negrao, N., Yamaga, K.: The unilateral engram. Acta neurobiol. exp. 33, 711–728 (1973)Google Scholar
  13. Giurgea, C.: Vers une pharmacologie de l'activité intégrative du cerveau. Tentative du concept nootrope en psychopharmacologie. Actualités pharmacol. 25, 115–156 (1972)Google Scholar
  14. Giurgea, C., Lefevre, D., Lescrenier, C., David-Remacle, M.: Pharmacological protection against hypoxia induced amnesia in rats. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 20, 160–168 (1971)Google Scholar
  15. Giurgea, C., Mouravieff-Lesuisse, F.: Pharmacological studies on an elementary model of learning. The fixation of an experience at spinal level. Part I: Pharmacological reactivity of the spinal cord fixation time. Arch. int. Pharmacodyn. 191, 279–291 (1971)Google Scholar
  16. Giurgea, C., Mouravieff-Lesuisse, F.: Effect facilitateur du piracetam sur un apprentissage repetitif chez le rat. J. Pharmacol. (Paris) 3, 17–30 (1972)Google Scholar
  17. Giurgea, C., Moyersoons, F.: Differential pharmacological reactivity of three types of cortical evoked potentials. Arch. int. Pharmacodyn. 188, 401–404 (1970)Google Scholar
  18. Leao, A. A. P.: Spreading depression of activity in the cerebral cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 7, 359–390 (1944)Google Scholar
  19. Lund, R. D.: Uncrossed visual pathways of hooded and albino rats. Science 149, 1506–1507 (1965)Google Scholar
  20. Muntz, W. R., Sutherland, N. S.: The role of crossed and uncrossed optic nerve fibres in the visual discrimination of shape by rats. J. comp. Neurol. 122, 69–77 (1964)Google Scholar
  21. Myers, R. E., Sperry, R. W.: Interhemispheric communication through the corpus callosum: Mnemonic carry-over between the hemispheres. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. (Chic.) 80, 298–303 (1958)Google Scholar
  22. Mysliveček, J., Hassmannová, J.: Early sensory deprivation treated with Piracetam (UCB-Dipha 6215) in young rats. Activ. Nerv. Sup. (Praha) 15, 151–152 (1973)Google Scholar
  23. Mysliveček, J., Hassmannová, J.: An electrophysiological analysis of action of Piracetam in rats. Activ. Nerv. Sup. (Praha) 16, 242–244 (1974)Google Scholar
  24. Nadel, L., Burešová, O.: Monocular input and interhemispheric transfer in the reversible split brain. Nature (Lond.) 220, 914–915 (1968)Google Scholar
  25. Nadel, L., Burešová, O.: Interocular transfer in the hooded rat. Physiol. Behav. 4, 613–619 (1969)Google Scholar
  26. Nadel, L., Burešová, O.: Monocular input and interhemispheric transfer: Reversed transfer trials. Commun. Behav. Biol., Part A, 5, 63–66 (1970)Google Scholar
  27. Sara, S., David-Remacle, M.: Recovery from electroconvulsive shock induced amnesia by exposure to the training environment: pharmacological enhancement by Piracetam. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 36, 59–66 (1974)Google Scholar
  28. Sara, S., Lefevre, D.: Hypoxia-induced amnesia in one-trial learning and pharmacological protection by Piracetam. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 25, 32–40 (1972)Google Scholar
  29. Sheridan, C. L.: Interocular transfer of brightness and pattern discrimination in normal and corpus callosum sectioned rats. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 59, 292–294 (1965)Google Scholar
  30. Sheridan, C. L., Shrout, L. L.: Differences in the effectiveness of optic uncrossed fiber systems in albino and hooded rats. Psychon. Sci. 4, 177–178 (1966)Google Scholar
  31. Sperry, R. W.: The great cerebral commissure. Sci. Amer. 210, 42–52 (1964)Google Scholar
  32. Tomasch, J., MacMillan, A.: The number of fibres in corpus callosum of the white mouse. J. comp. Neurol. 107, 165–168 (1957)Google Scholar
  33. Wolthuis, O. L.: Experiments with UCB 6215, a drug which enhances acquisition in rats: its effects compared with those of metamphetamine. Europ. J. Pharmacol. 16, 283–297 (1971Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Burešová
    • 1
  • J. Bureš
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PhysiologyCzechoslovak Academy of SciencesPragueCzechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations