Skip to main content
Log in

Logistic regression model to estimate the risk of unbalanced offspring in reciprocal translocations

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Human Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to estimate the risk of viable unbalanced offspring for a parental carrier of reciprocal translocation. On a large computerized database of reciprocal translocations we used logistic regression to model this risk. The status of the progeny is the outcome variable. Explanatory covariates are cytogenetic characteristics of the translocation, age and sex of the parental carrier, and potential viability of the gametes. The results obtained by the logistic model demonstrate the important role of certain variables such as the sex of the parental carrier and the R band length of the translocated segments. Within the group of lower risk (risk of viable unbalanced offspring less than 5%), 97% of the individuals are correctly classified with this model. For this group, the choice prenatal diagnosis can be best discussed by considering both the risk for viable unbalanced offspring and the risk of induced abortion following prenatal diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberman E (1973) Epidemiology of spontaneous abortions and their chromosome constitution. In: Boué A, Thibault C (eds) Chromosomal errors in relation to reproductive failure. INSERM, Paris, pp 305–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Boué J, Boué A, Lazar P (1975) Retrospective and prospective epidemiological studies of 1500 karyotyped spontaneous human abortions. Teratology 12:11–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Boué A, Gallano P (1984) A collaborative study of the segregation of inherited chromosome structural rearrangements in 1356 prenatal diagnoses. Prenat Diagn 4:45–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Cans C, Cohen O, Mermet MA, Demongeot J, Jalbert P (1993) Human reciprocal translocations: is the unbalance mode at birth predictable? Hum Genet 91:228–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen O, Cans C, Mermet MA, Demongeot J, Jalbert P (1992) Human reciprocal translocations: a new computer system for genetic counseling. Ann Génét 35:193–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall BF, Lebherz TB, Rubinstein L, Robertson RD, Sample WF, Sarti D, Howard J (1980) Chromosomes findings in 2500 second trimester amniocentesis. Am J Med Genet 5:345–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel A (1979) Structural differences in reciprocal translocations. Potential for a model of risk in reciprocal translocations. Hum Genet 51:171–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel A, Hook EB, Wulf G (1988) Collaborative USA data on prenatal diagnosis for parental carriers of chromosome rearrangements: risk of unbalanced progeny. In: Daniel A (ed) The cytogenetics of mammalian autosomal rearrangements, Liss, New York, pp 73–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis JR, Rogers BB, Hagaman RM, Thies CA, Veomett IC (1985) Balanced reciprocal translocations: risk factors for aneuploid segregant viability. Clin Genet 27:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • De Arce MA, Grace PM, McManus S (1986) A computer model for the study of segregation in reciprocal translocation carriers: application to 20 new cases. Am J Hum Genet 24:519–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner RJM, Sutherland GS (1989) The simple reciprocal translocation. In: Motulsky AG, Bobrow M, Harper PS, Scriver C (eds) Oxford monographs on medical genetics no. 17. Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling. Oxfort University Press, Oxford, pp 29–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S (1989) Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. Am J Public Health 79:340–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R (1990) Generalized additive models. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • ISCN (1981) An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. High resolution banding. Cytogenet Cell Genet 11:88–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalbert P, Jalbert H, Sele B (1988) Types of imbalances in human reciprocal translocations: risks at birth. In: Daniel A (ed) The cytogenetics of mammalian autosomal rearrangements. Liss, New York, pp 267–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalbert P, Cohen O, Cans C, Mermet MA, Demongeot J (1992) Unbalances of reciprocal translocations (rcp): maximum thresholds of viability. Am J Hum Genet 51: A1240

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings DE (1986) Outliers and residual distributions in logistic regression. J Am Statist Assoc 81:987–990

    Google Scholar 

  • Landwehr J, Pregibon D, Shoemaker AC (1984) Graphical methods for assessing logistic regression models. J Am Statist Assoc 79:61–71

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh P, Neider JA (1989) Generalized linear models. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne CD (ed) (1987) GLIM system release 3.77 manual. Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrosky DL, Bergaonkar DS (1984) Segregation analysis in reciprocal translocation carriers. Am J Med Genet 19:137–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Pregibon D (1981) Logistic regression diagnostics. Ann Statistics 9:705–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Stene J (1989) Comments on estimations of risks to translocation carriers. Am J Med Genet 33:54–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengel Rutkowski S, Stene J, Gallano P (1988) Risk estimates in balanced reciprocal translocations. (Monographie des annales de génétique), Expansion Scientifique Française, Paris

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cans, C., Cohen, O., Lavergne, C. et al. Logistic regression model to estimate the risk of unbalanced offspring in reciprocal translocations. Hum Genet 92, 598–604 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00420946

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00420946

Keywords

Navigation