Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors influencing survival of the socket after primary low-friction arthroplasty of the hip

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Two hundred and sixty-seven consecutive primary low-friction arthroplasties, followed for 5 to 18 years after surgery, were studied to assess the factors influencing survival of the socket, using the Kaplan-Meier method. The end point of survival was defined radiologically in two ways: incipient failure (migration of 3 mm or more or rotation of 4° or more) and definite failure (progressive change of position). Twenty-four sockets (9.0%) developed incipient failure, and 14 of them progressed to definite failure. Preservation of the subchondral bone plate or eburnated bone in the acetabular roof, multiple 6-mm anchor holes, and two steps of evolution in socket design (the advent of a pressure-injection socket and than an ogee-flanged socket) benefited socket survival. Polyethylene wear was considered to be the most important factor limiting longevity of the socket.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brand RA, Pedersen DR, Yoder SA (1986) How definition of “loosening” affects the incidence of loose total hip reconstructions. Clin Orthop 210:185–191

    Google Scholar 

  2. Charnley J (1979) Low friction arthroplasty of the hip: theory and practice. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eftekhar NS, Pawluk RJ (1980) Role of surgical preparation in acetabular cup fixation. In: Riley LH Jr (ed) The hip. Proceedings of the eighth open scientific meeting of the hip society. Mosby, St Louis, pp 308–328

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goodman SB, Adler SJ, Fyhrie DP, Schurman DJ (1988) The acetabular teardrop and its relevance to acetabular migration. Clin Orthop 236:199–204

    Google Scholar 

  5. Griffith MJ, Seidenstein MK, Williams D, Charnley J (1978) Socket wear in Charnley low friction arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 137:37–47

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hamilton HW, Joyce M (1986) Long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty performed in a community hospital, including a radiologic review. Clin Orthop 211:55–64

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harris WH (1992) The first 32 years of total hip arthroplasty. One surgeon's perspective. Clin Orthop 274:6–11

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hartofilakidis G, Stamos K, Ioannidis TT (1989) Fifteen years' experience with Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 246:48–56

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kobayashi S, Terayama K (1990) Radiology of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip: a comparison of socket fixation technique. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 72:439–443

    Google Scholar 

  11. Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Morrey B (1990) Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72:518–528

    Google Scholar 

  12. Loudon JR, Charnley J (1980) Subsidence of the femoral prosthesis in total hip replacement in relation to the design of the stem. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 62:450–453

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nunn D, Freeman MAR, Hill PF, Evans SJW (1989) The measurement of migration of the acetabular component of hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 71:629–631

    Google Scholar 

  14. Oh I, Sander TW, Treharne RW (1985) Total hip acetabular cup flange design and its effect on cement fixation. Clin Orthop 195:304–309

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schmalzried TP, Kwong LM, Jasty M, Sedlacek RC, Haire TC, O'Connor DO, Bragdon CR, Kabo JM, Malcolm AJ, Harris WH (1992) The mechanism of loosening of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of specimens retrieved at autopsy. Clin Orthop 274:60–78

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shelley P, Wroblewski BM (1988) Socket design and cement pressurisation in the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 70:358–363

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thorén B, Sahlstedt B (1990) Influence of pelvic position on radiographic measurements of the prosthetic acetabular component. An experimental study on a pelvic model. Acta Radiol 31:133–136

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wetherell RG, Amis AA, Heatley FW (1989) Measurement of acetabular erosion. The effect of pelvic rotation on common landmarks. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 71:447–451

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wroblewski BM (1985) Direction and rate of socket wear in Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 67:757–761

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wroblewski BM (1986) 15-21-year results of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 211:30–35

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kobayashi, S., Terayama, K. Factors influencing survival of the socket after primary low-friction arthroplasty of the hip. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 112, 56–60 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00420254

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00420254

Keywords

Navigation