Advertisement

Psychological Research

, Volume 55, Issue 2, pp 182–189 | Cite as

Stability and change in children's skill

  • Helen E. Parker
  • Dawne Larkin
  • Timothy R. Ackland
Article

Summary

This paper explores age-related performance variability, both within trials and between sessions, in repetitive hopping. The mean, the standard deviation (SD), and the coefficient of variation (CV) of several timing and ground-reaction-force variables of hopping were analysed by repeated-measures ANOVA for age-related effects across test sessions and foot used. Forty-five subjects in five age groups (3–4 years, 4–5 years, 6–7 years, 8–9 years, or Adult) performed self-paced, one-footed hopping on three occasions within one week. As was expected, the results showed main effects for Age in all force and time variables, with the exception of CV of medio-lateral force. No significant main effects for Feet were revealed. However, significant Feet x Session interactions were found in flight-time measures, with higher flight-time SD and lower CV for the non-preferred foot in Session 1, a reversal in Session 2, and a negligible difference in Session 3. Across sessions, decreased SD and CV for both vertical and medio-lateral force and shorter flight time indicated more efficient hopping. Overall, it was concluded that SD and CV measures were more sensitive measures of children's performance across repeated sessions than were mean scores and that the order of testing the limbs is an important consideration in experimental protocols when lateralized tasks are measured.

Keywords

Time Variable Experimental Protocol Test Session Sensitive Measure Flight Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armitage, M., & Larkin, D. (1991). Footedness: A multidimensional construct? Transactions of the W. A. Neuroscience Colloquium. Fremantle, 21–22 November.Google Scholar
  2. Armitage, M., & Larkin, D. (1993). Laterality, motor asymmetry and clumsiness in children. Human Movement Science, 12, 155–177.Google Scholar
  3. Denckla, M. B. (1974). Development of motor coordination in normal children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 16, 729–741.Google Scholar
  4. Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. (1967). Human performance. London: Brooks Cole.Google Scholar
  5. Greer, N. L., Hamill, J., & Campbell, K. R. (1989). Ground reaction forces in children's gait. Pediatric Exercise Science, 1, 45–53.Google Scholar
  6. Halverson, L. E., & Williams, K. (1985). Developmental sequences for hopping over distance: A prelongitudinal screening. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 56, 37–44.Google Scholar
  7. Haywood, K. M. (1986). Life span motor development. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  8. Keogh, J., & Sugden, D. A. (1984). Movement skill development. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Kugler, P. N., & Turvey, M. T. (1987). Information, natural law, and the self-assembly of rhythmic movement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Larkin, D., Hoare, D., Phillips, S., & Smith, K. (1988, August). Performance asymmetry in poorly coordinated children (Abstract F62). Abstracts of the XXIV International Congress of Psychology, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  11. McCarron, L. T. (1982). McCarron assessment of neuromuscular development (rev. ed.). Dallas:Common Market Press.Google Scholar
  12. Nonis, K. P., Parker, H. E., & Larkin, D. L. (1992). An observation checklist for hopping-in-place. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  13. Parker, H. E. (1990). The development of coordination and timing in a rhythmic multi-limbed task. Unpublished doctoral thesis. The University of Western Australia, Perth.Google Scholar
  14. Parker, H. E., Monson, K. P., & Larkin, D. (1993). Symmetrical and asymmetrical motor control in children: Bipedal and unipedal hopping. Human Movement Science, 12, 129–143.Google Scholar
  15. Roberton, M. A., & Halverson, L. E. (1984). Developing children - their changing movement. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
  16. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar
  17. Whitall, J. (1989). A developmental study of the interlimb coordination in running and galloping. Journal of Motor Behavior, 21(4), 409–428.Google Scholar
  18. Wickstrom, R. L. (1983). Fundamental motor patterns (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
  19. Winter, D. A. (1984). Kinematic and kinetic patterns in human gait: Variability and compensating effects. Human Movement Science, 3, 51–76.Google Scholar
  20. Winter, D. A. (1987). The biomechanics and motor control of human gait. Waterloo: University of Waterloo Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen E. Parker
    • 1
  • Dawne Larkin
    • 1
  • Timothy R. Ackland
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Human MovementUniversity of Western AustraliaNedlandsAustralia

Personalised recommendations