Skip to main content
Log in

On music perception and cognition: Modularity, structure, and processing

  • General Articles
  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper treats issues concerning the modular modelisation of musical mental processes. Some musical phenomena, like musical illusions, are explained in the framework of modularity and hypotheses are advanced in which the modular model seems very promising for the study of musical perception and cognition. In addition, arguments are proposed to distinguish between levels of abstraction and knowledge in musical cognitive processes.

Moreover, some aspects about the theory of musical competence and the theory of musical processing are identified and the possibilities for the integration of varying theoretical assertions are considered in light of these distinctions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agmon, E. (1990). ‘Music Theory as Cognitive Science: Some Conceptual and Methodological Issues’, Music Perception 7(3).

  • BlackingJ. (1981). ‘The Problem of “Ethnic” Perceptions in the Semiotics of Music’, in W.Steiner, ed., The Sign in Music and Literature, Austin, University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BlackingJ. (1984). ‘What Languages Do Musical Grammars Describe?’, in M.Baroni and L.Callegari, eds., Musical Grammars and Computer Analysis, Firenze, Olschki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blacking, J. (1987). Personal communication.

  • Butler, D. (1989), ‘Describing the Perception of Tonality in Music: A Critique of the Tonal Hierarchy Theory and a Proposal for a Theory of Intervallic Rivalry’, Music Perception 6(3).

  • Camilleri, L. (1986). ‘Music, Mind and Programs’, Diogenes 133.

  • CamilleriL. (1987). ‘Towards a Computational Theory of Music’, in T.Sebeok and J.Umiker-Sebeok, es., Semiotic Web '86: A Yearbook of Semiotic, Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camilleri, L. (1989), ‘A Modular Approach to Music Cognition’, Interface 18(1–2).

  • Camilleri, L., Carreras, F., and Duranti, C. (1990). ‘An Expert System Prototype for the Study of Musical Segmentation’, Interface 19(2–3).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeutschD. (1982). ‘Grouping Mechanisms in Music’, in D.Deutsch, ed., Psychology of Music, New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DowlingJ. W. and HarwoodD. L. (1986). Music Cognition, New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DretskeF. I. (1981). Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Cambridge Mass., MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, H. E. (1984). ‘Music Cognition: Serial Process or Parallel Process?’, Council for Research in Music Education 80.

  • FodorJ. (1983). The Modularity of Mind, Cambridge Mass., The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FodorJ. (1984). ‘Observation Reconsidered’, Philosophy of Science LI: 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • GardnerH. (1983). Frames of Mind. The Theory of Multiple Intelligences, New York, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • GarfieldJ. L., ed. (1987). Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural Language Understanding, Cambridge MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjerdingen, R. O. (1986). ‘The Formation and Deformation of Classic/Romantic Phrase Schemata’, Music Theory Spectrum 8.

  • JackendoffR. (1987). Consciousness and the Computational Mind, Cambridge MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1991). ‘Musical Parsing and Musical Affect’, Music Perception 9(2).

  • Leman, M. (1990). ‘Emergency of Properties of Tonality Functions by Self-Organization’, Interface 19(2–3).

  • Lerdahl, F. (1988). ‘Tonal Pitch Space’, Music Perception 5(3).

  • LerdahlF. and JacendoffR. (1983). A Generative Theory of Tonal Music, Cambridge Mass., The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LerdahlF. and JackendoffR. (1984). ‘An Overview of Hierarchical Structure in Music’, Music Perception I, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • MeyerL. B. (1973). Explainig Music, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NarmourE. (1984). ‘Toward an Analytical Symbology: the Melodic, Harmonic and Durational Functions of Implication and Realization’, in M.Baroni and L.Callegari, eds., Musical Grammars and Computer Analysis, Firenze, Olschki.

    Google Scholar 

  • NarmourE. (1990). The Analysis and Cognition of Basic Melodic Structures: The Implication Realization Model, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • PylyshynZ. W. (1985). Computation and Cognition, Cambridge Mass., The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, U. (1990). Systematische Musiktheorie und Kognitionswissenschaft. Ein Beitrag zur Fundierung der Kognitiven Musikwissenschaft, PhD. Dissertation, University of Hamburg.

  • SlobodaJ. (1985). The Musical Mind, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • TanenhausM. et al. (1987). ‘Context Effects and Lexical Processing: A Connectionist Approach to Modularity’, in J.Garfield, ed., Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural Language Understanding, Cambridge MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • TrehubS. (1989). ‘The Perception of Musical Patterns by Human Infants: The Provision of Similar Patterns by Their Parents’, in W. C.Stebbins and M.Berkley, eds., Comparative Perception, New York, Wiley Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Camilleri, L. On music perception and cognition: Modularity, structure, and processing. Minds and Machines 2, 365–377 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419419

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419419

Key words

Navigation