Skip to main content
Log in

The frequency of 47,+21, 47,+18, and 47,+13 at the uppermost extremes of maternal ages: results on 56,094 fetuses studied prenatally and comparisons with data on livebirths

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Human Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We examined the proportions (or so called “rates”) of fetuses with 47,+21, 47,+18, or 47,+13 diagnosed prenatally in women at the upper extremes of age. Our analysis was prompted by results from a large scale European study of amniocentesis which indicated that after increasing exponentially from age 35 years, the proportions of the autosomal trisomies reached a peak at a specific age and then leveled off or declined at the upper end of the age range. We analyzed North American data on 56,075 fetuses studied because of no known cytogenetic risk factor (aside from maternal age). This is the largest series to data. For 47,+21, the data from amniocentesis studies provide no evidence for any drop in the rate of change of proportion with maternal age up to 49 years. There is, if anything, a trend in our data to a steepening in the exponential rate of change at the upper extreme of age (above 46 years). Data from livebirths on the Down syndrome phenotype are at least consistent with an exponential rate of increase in proportion affected up to age 49 years. For 47,+18 our data from prenatal diagnoses are more consistent with an exponential increase up to age 43 years and a level proportion (or “rate”) after that. For 47,+13 no cases were observed above age 42 years, consistent with the drop in proportion affected above this age observed in the European series. We emphasize the possible effect of sampling fluctuation and reporting error upon these apparent trends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (1977) Diagnosis of genetic disease by amniocentesis: a Canadian study. Report No. 5, Ottawa: Medical Research Council., pp 109–118

  • Bryla D (1975) Personal communication

  • Cochran WG (1954) Some methods for strengthening the common chi2 tests. Biometrics 10:417

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornfield J (1976) Letter to the editor re: rates and proportions. Am J Epidemiol 104:602

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall B (1983) Personal communication

  • Elandt-Johnson RC (1975) Definition of rates: some remarks on their use and misuse. Am J Epidemiol 102:267–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson-Smith MA (1983) Prenatal chromosome analysis and its impact on the birth incidence of chromosome disorders. Br Med Bull 39:355–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson-Smith MA, Yates JRW (to be published) Maternal age specific rates for chromosome aberrations and factors influencing them: report of a collaborative European study on 52,965 amniocenteses. Prenatal Diagnosis

  • Golbus M (1983) Personal communication

  • Hook EB, Chambers GC (1977) Estimated rates of Down syndrome in livebirths by one year maternal age intervals for mothers aged 20 to 49 in a New York study: implications of the “risk” figures for genetic counseling and cost-benefit analysis of prenatal diagnosis programs. In: Bergsma D, Lowry RB, Trimble BK, Feingold M (eds) Numerical taxonomy of birth defects and polygenic disorders. Birth Defects 13:123–141

  • Hook EB, Fabia JJ (1978) Frequency of Down syndrome by single year maternal age interval: results of a Massachusetts study. Teratology 17:223–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook EB, Lamson SH (1980) Rates of Down's syndrome at the upper extreme of maternal age—absence of a leveling effect and evidence for artifacts resulting from an analysis of rates by five year maternal age intervals. Am J Epidemiol 111:75–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook EB (1979) Genetic counseling and prenatal cytogenetic services: cost-benefit considerations and policy implications. In: Porter IH, Hook EB (eds) Service and education in medical genetics. Academic Press, New York, pp 29–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook EB, Lindsjo A (1978) Down's syndrome in livebirths by single year maternal age interval in a Swedish study: comparison with results from a New York State study. Am J Hum Genet 30:19–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook EB, Woodbury DF, Albright SG (1979) Rates of trisomy 18 in livebirths, stillbirths, and at amniocentesis. In: Epstein CJ, Curry CJ, Packman S, Hall B (eds) Genetic counseling: risk communication and decision making. Birth Defects 15:81–93

  • Hook EB, Cross PK, Schreinemachers D (1981) The evolution of the New York State Chromosome Registry. In: Hook EB, Porter IH (eds) Population and biological aspects of human mutation. Academic Press, New York, pp 389–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook EB, Cross PK, Schreinemachers DM (1983) Rates of chromosomal abnormalities at amniocentesis and in livebirths. JAMA 249:2034–2038

    Google Scholar 

  • Huether CA, Gummere GR, Hook EB, Dignan PSJ, Volodkevich H, Berg M, Ludwig D, Lamson SH (1981) Down syndrome: percentage reporting on birth certificates and single year maternal age risk rates for Ohio 1970–1979; comparison with Upstate New York data. Am J Public Health 71:1367–1372

    Google Scholar 

  • Koulischer L, Gillerot Y (1980) Down's syndrome in Wallonia (South Belgium), 1971–1978: cytogenetics and incidence. Hum Genet 54:243–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamson SH, Hook EB (1981) Comparison of mathematical models for the maternal age dependence of Down's syndrome rates. Hum Genet 59:232–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld A (1969) Epidemiology of Down's syndrome. Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, pp 27–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Magenis RE, Hecht F, Milham S Jr (1968) Trisomy 13 (D1) syndrome: studies on parental age, sex ratio, and survival. J Pediatr 73:222–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteleone PL, Anderson R, Chen S-C, Nouri S, Monteleone JA, Taysi K (1981) A demographic study of trisomy 13. Pediatr Res 15:565

    Google Scholar 

  • NICHD National Registry for Amniocentesis Study Group (1976) Mid-trimester amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis—safety and accuracy. JAMA 236:1471–1476

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose LS, Smith GF (1966) Down's anomaly. J and A Churchill, London, pp 167–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott GH, Rivas ML, Shanbeck L, Macfarlane DW, Wyandt HE, Breg WR, Lubs HA, Magenis RE, Summitt RL, Palmer CG, Hecht F, Kimberling W, Clow D (1978) The Interregional Cytogenetic Register System (I.C.R.S.). Birth Defects 15:269–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreinemachers DM, Cross PK, Hook EB (1982) Rates of 47,+21, 47,+18, 47,+13, XXY and XXX genotype detected in about 20,000 prenatal cytogenetic diagnoses by one year maternal age interval. Hum Genet 61:318–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Shyrock HS, Siegel JS (1975) The materials and methods of demography. V. 2, US Bureau of the Census, US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson NG (1977) Personal communication

  • Sutherland GR, Clisby SR, Bloor G, Carter RF (1979) Down's syndrome in South Australia. Med J Aust 2:58–61

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hook, E.B., Cross, P.K. & Regal, R.R. The frequency of 47,+21, 47,+18, and 47,+13 at the uppermost extremes of maternal ages: results on 56,094 fetuses studied prenatally and comparisons with data on livebirths. Hum Genet 68, 211–220 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00418391

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00418391

Keywords

Navigation