Skip to main content
Log in

Summary

Indication for pharyngeal flap operation was discussed particularly from the following 3 viewpoints; diseases and factors responsible for velopharyngeal incompetence, and the extent. Aerodynamic (pressure-flow) techniques now in use at our clinic were described, which permit objective evaluation of the degree of velopharyngeal incompetence. For the factor analysis of velopharyngeal incompetence, new X-ray techniques-cineradiography of the lateral pharyngeal wall movement and objective evaluation of velar mobility by double exposure technique were found to be of clinical value.

On the basis of pre- and postoperative findings of 30 pharyngeal flap cases, the followings were emphasized.

  1. 1.

    Speech results after pharyngeal flap depend not only on the surgery but also greatly on the other factors such as faulty habits of articulation.

  2. 2.

    The flap operation should be performed before 10, or at latest before 15 years of age.

  3. 3.

    If a patient with velopharyngeal incompetence has no faulty habits of articulation, speech should generally be improved to an acceptable level by pharyngeal flap operation.

Zusammenfassunq

Die Indikation für die Pharynxlappenoperation ist teilweise von folgenden drei Gesichtspunkten diskutiert werden: Krankheiten und Faktoren, die verantwortlich sind für die Gaumensegelschwäche und deren Ausdehnung. Aerodynamische, jetzt in unserer Klinik gebräuchliche Techniken, die eine objektive Bestimmung des Grades der Gaumensegelinsuffizienz ermöglichen, werden beschrieben. Für die Faktoranalyse der Gaumensegelschwache fanden wir, daß neue Röntgentechniken wie Röntgenkinematographie der Bewegung der lateralen Pharynxwand und objektive Ausmessung der Gaumensegelbeweglichkeit durch Doppelbelichtung von klinischem Wert sind.

Aus der Grundlage von prä und postoperativen Befunden von 30 Pharynxlappenfällen wird folgendes betont:

  1. 1.

    Das Sprachresultat hängt nicht allein vom chirurgischen Eingriff ab, sondern auch weitgehend von anderen Faktoren, wie dem Charakter des Sprachfehlers.

  2. 2.

    Die Operation sollte möglichst vor dem 10. Lebensjahr, jedenfalls aber vor dem 15. Lebensjahr durchgeführt werden.

  3. 3.

    Wenn ein Patient mit Gaumensegelschwäche keine fehlerhafte Sprachgewohnheit hat, wird die Sprache im allgemeinen zu einem akzeptablen Niveau durch die Operation verbessert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernstein, L.: Treatment of velopharyngeal incompetence. Arch. Otolaryng. 85, 67–74 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bzoch, K. R.: The effect of a specific pharyngeal flap operation upon the speech of forty cleft-palate persons. J. Speech Dis. 29, 111–120 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Honjow, I., Isshiki, N., Morimoto, M.: Aerodynamic pattern of cleft palate speech. Plast. reconstr. Surg. 42, 465–471 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • — — Tanabe: Objective evaluation of velar mobility. Plast. reconstr. Sug. 44, 597–600 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Isshiki, N., Honjow, I., Morimoto, M.: Effects of velopharyngeal incompetence upon speech. Cleft Palate J. 5, 297–310 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, —, —: Cineradiographic analysis of movement of the lateral pharyngeal wall. Plast. reconstr. Surg. 44, 357–363 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, K. L., Huffman, W. C., Lierle, D. M., Smith, J. K.: Factors related to the success of pharyngeal flap procedures. Plast. reconstr. Surg. 32, 581–588 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, R. E.: The pharyngeal flap as a speech aid. Plast. reconstr. Surg. 7, 202–213 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, H. L., Smith, J. K.: A multiple approach for evaluating velopharyngeal competence. J. Speech Dis. 27, 218–226 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Spriestersbach, D. C.: The pharyngeal flap as a speech mechanism. Plast. reconstr. Surg. 39, 66–70 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Owsley, J. Q., Lawson, L. I., Miller, E. R., Blackfield, H. M.: Experience with the high attached pharyngeal flap. Plast. reconstr. Surg. 38, 232–242 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. W., Byrne, M., McClelland, W. D.: Speech evaluation of the posterior pharyngeal flap. Plast. reconstr. Surg. 15, 114–116 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skoog, T.: The pharyngeal flap operation in cleft palate. Brit. J. plast. Surg. 18, 265–282 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. K., Huffman, W. C., Lierle, D. M., Moll, K. L.: Results of pharyngeal flap surgery in patients with velopharyngeal incompetence. Plast. reconstr. Surg. 32, 493–501 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Subtelny, J. D., McCormack, R. M., Subtelny, J. D., Cichoke, A. J.: Cineradiographic and pressure-flow analysis of speech before and after pharyngeal-flap surgery. Plast reconstr. Surg. 44, 336–344 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, R. C., Coffey, R. J., Russell, J. A., Quigley, L. F.: Methods of surgical correction of velopharyngeal sphincter incompetency using palatal and posterior pharyngeal tissues: proposed system of classification. Plast. reconstr. Surg. 18, 474–489 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, H. B., Woolhouse, F. M.: Comparison of speech improvement in cases of cleft palate after two methods of pharyngoplasty. Plast. reconstr. Surg. 30, 36–42 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dozent.

Staff member.

Professor and Head of the Department.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Isshiki, N., Honjow, I. & Morimoto, M. Indication and the results of pharyngeal flap operation. Arch. Klin. Exp. Ohr.-, Nas.- U. Kehlk. Heilk. 200, 158–168 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00418199

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00418199

Keywords

Navigation