Skip to main content
Log in

Use of field observations to characterise genotypic flowering responses to photoperiod and temperature: a soyabean exemplar

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thirty-nine accessions of soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] and 1 of wild annual soyabean (Glycine soja L.) were sown at two sites in Taiwan in 1989 and 1990 and on six occasions during 1990 at one site in Queensland, Australia. On two of the occasions in Australia additional treatments extended natural daylengths by 0.5 h and 2 h. The number of days from sowing for the first flower to appear on 50% of the plants in each treatment was recorded (f), and from these values the rate of progress towards flowering (1/f) was related to temperature and photoperiod. In photoperiod-insensitive accessions it was confirmed that the rate is linearly related to temperature at least up to about 29°C. In photoperiod-sensitive genotypes this is also the case in shorter daylengths but when the critical photoperiod (P c) is exceeded flowering is delayed. This delay increases with photoperiod until a ceiling photoperiod (P ce) is reached. Between P c and P ce, 1/f is linearly related to both temperature (positive) and photoperiod (negative), but in photoperiods longer than P ce there is no further response to either factor. The resulting triple-intersecting-plane response surface can be defined by six genetically-determined coefficients, the values of which are environment-independent but predict time to flower in any environment, and thus quantify the genotype x environment interaction. By this means the field data were used to characterise the photothermal responses of all 40 accessions. The outcome of this characterisation in conjunction with an analysis of the world-wide range of photothermal environments in which soyabean crops are grown lead to the following conclusions: (1) photoperiod-insensitivity is essential in soyabean crops in temperate latitudes, but such genotypes flower too rapidly for satisfactory yields in the tropics; (2) photoperiod-sensitivity appears to be essential to delay flowering sufficiently to allow adequate biomass accumulation in the warm climates of the tropics; (3) contrary to a widely held view, some degree of photoperiod-sensitivity is also needed in the tropics if crop-duration homeostasis is required where there is variation in sowing dates (this is achieved through a photoperiod-controlled delay in flowering which counteracts the seasonal increase in temperature that is correlated with increase in day-length); and (4) a greater degree of photoperiod-sensitivity is necessary to provide maturity-date homeostasis for variable sowing dates — a valuable attribute in regions of uncertain rainfall. Since the triple-intersecting-plane response model used here also applies to other species, the use of field data to characterise the photothermal responses of other crops is discussed briefly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bunting AH (1975) Time, phenology and the yields of crops. Weather 30:312–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler RF (1979) Rice in the tropics: a guide to the development of national programs. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson ST, Summerfield RJ, Ellis RH, Roberts EH (1993) Durations of the photoperiod-sensitive and photoperiod-insensitive phases of development in four cultivars of soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Ann Bot 71:389–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Craufurd PQ, Qi A, Ellis RH, Summerfield RJ, Roberts EH (1996) Development in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). II. Effects of temperature and saturation deficit on time to flowering in photoperiod-insensitive genotypes. Exp Agric 32:13–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis DL (1968) The relation between the heading of Nigerian sorghums and the duration of the growing season. J Appl Ecol 5:215–226

    Google Scholar 

  • de Datta SK (1981) Principles and practices of rice production. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett MD, Rogers JA, Stern RD (1983) Independence of rainfalls through the rainy season and the implications for the estimation of rainfall probabilities. J Climatol 3:375–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Egli DB (1993) Cultivar maturity and potential yield of soybean. Field Crops Res 32:147–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis RH, Summerfield RJ, Roberts EH (1988a) Effects of temperature, photoperiod and seed vernalization on flowering in faba bean (Vicia faba). Ann Bot 61:17–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis RH, Roberts EH, Summerfield RJ (1988b) Photothermal time for flowering in faba bean (Vicia faba) and the analysis of potential vernalization responses. Ann Bot 61:73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis RH, Roberts EH, Summerfield RJ, Cooper JP (1988c) Environmental control of flowering in barley (Hordeum vulgare L). II. Rate of development as a function of temperature and photoperiod and its modification by low temperature vernalization. Ann Bot 62:145–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, RH, Summerfield, RJ, Roberts, EH, Cooper, JP (1989) Environmental control of flowering in barley (Hordeum vulgare). III. Analysis of vernalization responses, and methods of screening germplasm for sensitivity to photoperiod and temperature. Ann Bot 63:687–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis RH, Lawn RJ, Summerfield RJ, Qi A, Roberts EH, Chay PM, Brouwer JL, Rose JL, Yeates SJ (1994a) Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. III. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Exp Agric 30:17–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis RH, Lawn RJ, Summerfield RJ, Qi A, Roberts EH, Chay PM, Brouwer JB, Rose JL, Yeates SJ, Sandover S (1994b) Towards the reliable predication of time to flowering in six annual crops. IV. Cultivated and wild mungbean. Exp Agric 30:31–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis RH, Lawn RJ, Summerfield RJ, Qi A, Roberts EH, Chay PM, Brouwer JB, Rose JL, Yeates SJ and Sandover S (1994c) Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. V. Chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Exp Agric 30:271–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Erskine W, Ellis RH, Summerfield RJ, Roberts EH, Hussein A (1990) Characterization of responses to temperature and photoperiod for time to flowering in a world lentil collection. Theor Appl Genet 80:193–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans PM, Lawn RJ, Watkinson AR (1992) Use of linear models to predict flowering in subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.). Aust J Agric Res 43:1547–1558

    Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson JHA (1952) Photothermographs: a tool for climate studies in relation to the ecology of vegetable varieties. Euphytica 6:97–105

    Google Scholar 

  • GENSTAT V Committee (1987) Genstat V reference manual, Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley P, Roberts EH, Summerfield RJ, Minchin FR (1983) A quantitative model of reproductive development in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] in relation to photoperiod and temperature, and implications for screening germplasm. Ann Bot 51:531–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley P, Roberts EH, Summerfield RJ, Minchin FR (1984a) Effects of temperature and photoperiod on flowering in soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]: a quantitative model. Ann Bot 53:669–681

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley P, Summerfield RJ, Roberts EH (1984b) Effects of temperature and photoperiod on reproductive development of selected grain legume crops. In: Jones DG, Davies DR (eds) Temperate legumes: physiology, genetics and nodulation, Pitman, Boston, pp 19–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson H, Borlaug NE, Anderson RG (1982) Wheat in the third world. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymowitz T, Bernard RL (1991) Origin of the soybean and germplasm introduction and development in North America. In: Shands HL, Wiesner LE (eds) Use of plant introductions in cultivar development, part 1. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, Wis., pp 147–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiihl RA, Garcia A (1989) The use of the long-juvenile trail in breeding soybean cultivars. In: Pascale AJ (ed) Proc World Soybean Res Conf IV. AASOJA, Buenos Aires, pp 994–1000

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawn RJ (1989) Agronomic and physiological constraints to the productivity of tropical grain legumes. Exp Agric 25:509–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawn RJ, Imrie BC (1993) Exploiting physiological understanding in crop improvement. In: Imrie BC, Hacker JBH (eds) Focused plant improvement: towards responsible and sustainable agriculture, vol. I. (Proc 10th Aust Plant Breed Conf. Organising Committee, Australian Convention and Travel Service, Canberra), pp 136–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawn RJ, Troedson RJ (1990) Pigeonpea:physiology of yield formation. In: Nene YL, Hall SD, Sheila VK (eds) The pigeon pea. Cab Int, Wallingford UK, pp 179–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawn RJ, Summerfield RJ, Ellis RH, Qi A, Roberts EH, Chay PM, Brouwer JB, Rose JL, Yeates SJ (1995) Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. VI. Applications in crop improvement. Exp Agric 31:89–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Loss SP, Perry MW, Anderson WK (1990) Flowering times of wheat in south-western Australia: a modelling approach. Aust J Agric Res 41:213–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow MM, Muchow RC (1990) A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Adv Agron 43:107–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Major DJ, Kiniry JR (1991) Predicting daylength effects on phenological processes. In: Hodges T (ed) Predicting crop phenology. CRC Press, Fla., pp 15–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers JD, Lawn RJ, Byth DE (1991a) Adaptation of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) to the dry season of the tropics. I. Genotypic and environmental effects on phenology. Aust J Agric Res 42:497–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers JD, Lawn RJ, Byth DE (1991b) Adaptation of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) to the dry season of the tropics. II. Genotypic and environmental effects on biomass and seed yield. Aust J Agric Res 42:517–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers JD, Lawn RJ, Byth DE (1991c) Agronomic studies on soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) in the dry season of the tropics. I. Limits to yield imposed by phenology. Aust J Agric Res 42:1075–1092

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers JD, Lawn RJ, Byth DE (1991d) Agronomic studies on soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) in the dry season of the tropics. II. Interaction of sowing date and sowing density. Aust J Agric Res 42:1093–1107

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers JD, Lawn RJ, Byth DE (1991e) Agronomic studies on soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) in the dry season of the tropics. III. Effect of photoperiod extension on phenology, biomass and seed yield. Aust J Agric Res 42:1109–1121

    Google Scholar 

  • Omanga PA, Summerfield RJ, Qi A (1995) Flowering of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) in Kenya: responses of early maturing genotypes to location and date of sowing. Field Crops Res 41:25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Omanga PA, Summerfield RJ, Qi A (1996) Flowering in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) in Kenya: responses of medium — and late maturing genotypes to location and date of flowering. Exp Agric 32:111–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry MW, Siddique KHM, Wallace JF (1987) Predicting phenological development for Australian wheats. Aust J Agric Res 38:809–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards RA, Lopez-Castaneda C, Gomez-MacPherson H, Condon AG (1993) Improving the efficiency of water use by plant breeding and molecular biology. Irrigation Sci 14:93–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts EH (1991) How do crops know when to flower? Biol Sci Review 3:2–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts EH, Summerfield RJ (1987) Measurement and prediction of flowering in annual crops. In: Atherton JG (ed) Manipulation of flowering. Butterworth, London, pp 17–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts EH, Hadley P, Summerfield RJ (1985) Effects of temperature and photoperiod on flowering in chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) Ann Bot 55:881–892

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts EH, Summerfield RJ, Ellis RH, Qi A (1993) Adaptation of flowering in crops to climate. Outlook on Agric 22:105–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts EH, Summerfield RJ, Ellis RH, Qi A (1996) Graphic representation of flowering adaptation to climate in soybean. Proc World Soybean Res Conf V (in press)

  • Sinclair, TR, Muchow, RC, Bennett, JM, Hammond, LC (1988) Relative sensitivity of nitrogen and biomass accumulation to drought in field-grown soyabean. Agron J 79:986–991

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerfield RJ, Lawn RJ (1987) Environmental modulation of flowering in mungbean (Vigna radiata): a reappraisal. Exp Agric 23:461–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerfield RJ, Lawn RJ (1988) Environmental modulation of flowering in mungbean (Vigna radiata): further reappraisal for diverse genotypes and photothermal regimes. Exp Agric 24:75–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerfield RJ, Roberts EH (1987) Effects of irradiance in long- and short-day grain legumes: a reappraisal and unifying model. In: Atherton JG (ed) Manipulation of flowering. Butterworth, London, pp 203–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerfield RJ, Roberts EH, Erskine W, Ellis RH (1985) Effects of temperature and photoperiod on flowering in lentils (Lens culinaris Medic.) Ann Bot 56:659–671

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerfield RJ, Ellis RH, Roberts EH (1989) Vernalization in chickpea (Cicer arietinum): fact or artefact? Ann Bot 64:599–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerfield RJ, Roberts EH, Ellis RH and Lawn RJ (1991) Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. I. The development of simple models for fluctuating field environments. Exp Agric 27:11–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerfield RJ, Collinson ST, Ellis RH, Roberts EH, Penning de Vries FWT (1992) Photothermal responses of flowering in rice (Oryza sativa). Ann Bot 69:101–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerfield RJ, Lawn RJ, Qi A, Ellis RH, Roberts EH, Chay PM, Brouwer JB, Rose JL, Shanmugasunderam S, Yeates SJ, Sandover S (1993) Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. II. Soyabean (Glycine max). Exp Agric 29:253–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyay AP, Ellis RH, Summerfield RJ, Roberts EH, Qi A (1994a) Characterization of photothermal flowering responses in maturity isolines of soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] cv ‘Clark’. Ann Bot 74:87–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyay AP, Summerfield RJ, Ellis RH, Roberts EH, Qi A (1994b) Variations in the durations of the photoperiod-sensitive and photoperiod-insensitive phases of development to flowering among eight maturity isolines of soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Ann Bot 74:97–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkinson AR, Lawn RJ, Ellis RH, Qi A, Summerfield RJ (1994) RODMOD: A computer program for characterising genotypic variation in flowering responses to photoperiod and temperature. CSIRO Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, Brisbane, Queensland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by P. M. A. Tigerstedt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roberts, E.H., Qi, A., Ellis, R.H. et al. Use of field observations to characterise genotypic flowering responses to photoperiod and temperature: a soyabean exemplar. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 93, 519–533 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417943

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417943

Key words

Navigation