Skip to main content
Log in

Ondansetron plus dexamethasone versus metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine in cisplatin-treated patients with ovarian cancer

Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Female patients with ovarian cancer are at high risk for emesis. A study evaluating the antiemetic activity and tolerability of ondansetron plus dexamethasone compared to metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine in this group of patients has been performed. A group of 63 patients with ovarian cancer undergoing cisplatin treatment were enrolled in the study. Vomiting, nausea and other side-effects were evaluated by the investigators during the first 24 h and recorded by the patients on a diary card on days 2–4. Ondansetron plus dexamethasone showed a higher antiemetic activity during the first 24 h after cisplatin administration in all three cycles of cisplatin treatment, giving over 90% complete protection from vomiting at the first cycle. The efficacy of ondansetron plus dexamethasone decreased at the second cycle, but the percentage of complete protection from vomiting always remained better than 70%; there was poorer protection in the metoclopramide group, and its effect was similar during all three cycles. Ondansetron plus dexamethasone was also found to be more efficacious than the metoclopramide regimen on the second day after cisplatin administration, while on days 3–4 a high rate of complete protection from emesis was achieved by both antiemetic therapies (>80%). About 40%–55% of patients receiving ondansetron plus dexamethasone and about 65%–85% of patients treated with metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine reported nausea or vomiting during days 1–4. Ondansetron plus dexamethasone is more efficacious than metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine but new strategies to improve antiemetic efficacy in ovarian cancer patients must be outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Italian Group for Antiemetic Research (1992) Ondansetron+dexamethasone vs metoclopramide+dexamethasone diphenhydramine in prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Lancet 340:96–99

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roila F, Tonato M, Basurto C, Picciafuoco M, Bracarda S, Donati D, Malacarne P, Monici L, Di Costanzo F, Patoia L, Ballatori E, Tognoni G, Del Favero A (1989) Protection from nausea and vomiting in cisplatin-treated patients: high-dose metoclopramide combined with prednisolone versus metoclopramide combined with dexamethasone and diphenhydramine. A study of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research. J Clin Oncol 7:1693–1700

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roila F, Tonato M, Favalli G, Scarfone G, Cognetti F, Buzzi F, Sabbatini M, Matera G, Ballatori E, Olivieri A, Del Favero A (1993) Persistence of efficacy of ondansetron (OND) plus dexamethasone (DEX) vs metoclopramide (MTC) plus DEX and diphenhydramine (DIP) in acute emesis during three consecutive cycles of cisplatin (CDDP) chemotherapy (CT). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol Annu Meet 12:432

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tonato M, Roila F, Del Favero A (1991) Methodology of antiemetic trials: a review. Ann Oncol 2:107–114

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Consortia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Italian Group for Antiemetic Research. Ondansetron plus dexamethasone versus metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine in cisplatin-treated patients with ovarian cancer. Support Care Cancer 2, 167–170 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417475

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417475

Key words

Navigation