Skip to main content
Log in

Gender difference in the relationship of performance in the handgrip and standing long jump tests to lean limb volume in young adults

  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Groups of young, adult males and females performed the handgrip and standing long jump tests. Their total forearm and leg volumes were calculated from a series of circumference and length measurements, and the lean volumes (bone + muscle) calculated by taking the skinfold thickness into consideration. In the handgrip, the mean female performance was 298 N compared with 496 N for the males. In the standing long jump, mean performance expressed as distance x body mass was 87.3 kg · m for females compared with 137.7 kg · m for males. These superior performances of males could simply reflect their greater muscle mass, as the mean lean volumes of female and male limbs respectively were 0.54 l and 0.89 l for forearms, and 11.82 l and 14.82 l for the two legs. However, when the performances of males and females were grouped by lean limb volume, it was found that while in both tests there were linear relationships, males and females did not share a common line. In both tests the male relationship was at a higher level than the female; therefore, for a given lean volume, the male performance was significantly superior to that of the female. The gender difference found in this study has not been seen in other studies in which the performance of skeletal muscle has been related to the cross-sectional area of the active muscles and the possible reasons for the differences are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bale P (1980) The relationship between physique and body composition to strength in a group of physical education students. Br J Sports Med 14:193–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Bale P, McNaught-Davis P (1983) The physiques, fitness and strength of top class women hockey players. J Sports Med Phys Fit 23:80–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Bale P, Colley E, Mayhew JL (1984) Size and somatotype correlates of strength and physiological performance in adult male students. Aust J Sci Med Sport 16:2–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Bale P, Colley E, Mayhew JL (1985) Relationships among physique, strength and performance in women students. J Sports Med Phys Fit 25:98–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowrie W, Cummings GR (1972) Sustained handgrip in boys and girls: variation and correlation with performance and motivation to train. Res Q 43:131–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce SA, Phillips SK, Woledge RC (1986) Isometric force in maximum voluntary contractions related to an estimate of the cross-sectional area of adductor pollicis in the human subject. J Physiol 372: 31P

  • Costill DL, Daniels J, Evans W, Fink W, Krahenbuhl G, Saltin B (1976) Skeletal muscle enzymes and fiber composition in male and female track athletes. J Appl Physiol 40:149–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotes JE, Davies CTM, Edholm OG, Healy MJR, Tanner JM (1969) Factors relating to aerobic capacity of 46 healthy, British males and females ages 18 to 26 years. Proc R Soc Biol 174:91–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies BN, Greenwood EJ, Jones SR (1987) The relationship between lean limb volume and performance in the standing long-jump and handgrip test in young adult males and females. J Physiol 382:196P

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards RHT, Grindrod S, Narki M, Rutherford O, Sargeant A (1984) Assessment of leg muscle size by anthropometry and x-ray computerized tomography. J Physiol 353:4P

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis JD, Carran AV, Bailey DA (1975) Physical performance in boys from 10 through 16 years. Hum Biol 47:263–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyward V, McCreary L (1977) Analysis of static strength and relative endurance of women athletes. Res Q 48:703–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudash G, Albright JP, McAuley E, Martin RK, Fulton M (1985) Cross-sectional thigh components: computerized tomographic assessment. Med Sci Sports Exerc 17:417–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikai M, Fukunaga T (1968) Calculation of muscle strength per unit cross-sectional area of human muscle by means of ultrasonic measurement. Int Z Angew Physiol Einschl Arbeitsphysiol 26:26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones PRM, Pearson J (1969) Anthropometric determination of leg fat and muscle plus bone volumes in young male and female adults. J Physiol 204:63–66P

    Google Scholar 

  • Katch V, Weltman A (1975) Predictability of body segment volumes in living subjects. Hum Biol 47:203–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Komi PV, Karlsson J (1978) Skeletal muscle fibre types, enzyme activities and physical performance in young males and females. Acta Phys Scand 103:210–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Malina RM, Little BB (1985) Body composition, strength and motor performance in undernourished boys. In: Binkhorst RA, Kemper HCG, Saris WHM (eds) Children and exercise XI. Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc. Illinois, pp 293–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Maughan RJ, Nimmo MA (1984) The influence of variation in muscle fibre composition on muscle strength and cross sectional area in untrained males. J Physiol 351:299–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Maughan RJ, Watson JS, Weir J (1983) Relationship between muscle strength and muscle cross sectional area in male sprinters and endurance runners. Eur J Appl Physiol 50:309–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Maughan RJ, Watson JS, Weir J (1984) The relative proportions of fat, muscle and bone in the normal human forearm as determined by computed tomography. Clin Sci 66:683–689

    Google Scholar 

  • Maughan RJ, Nimmo MA, Harmon M (1985) The relationship between muscle myosin ATP-ase activity and isometric endurance in untrained male subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol 54:291–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Maughan RJ, Abel RW, Watson JS, Weir J (1986) Forearm composition and muscle function in trained and untrained limbs. Clin Physiol 6:389–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Montoye HJ, Lamphiear DE (1977) Grip and arm strength in males and females, age 10 to 69. Res Q 48:109–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Mynatt CV (1960) A study of differences in selected physical performance test scores of women in Tennessee colleges. Res Q 31:60–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrofsky JS, Burse RS, Lind AR (1975) Comparison of physiological responses of women and men to isometric exercise. J Appl Physiol 38:863–868

    Google Scholar 

  • Schantz P, Randall-Fox E, Hutchinson W, Tyden A, Astrand PO (1983) Muscle fibre type distribution, muscle cross-sectional area and maximal voluntary strength in humans. Acta Physiol Scand 117:219–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Serfass RC, Stull FA, Alexander JF, Ewing JL (1984) The effect of rapid weight loss and attempted rehydration on strength and endurance of handgripping muscles in College wrestlers. Res Q 55:46–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaccaro P, Clarke DH, Wrenn JP (1979) Physiological profiles of elite women basketball players. J Sports Med 19:45–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson AWS, O'Donovan DJ (1977) Factors relating to strength of male adolescents. J Appl Physiol 43:834–838

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmore JH (1974) Alterations in strength, body composition and anthropometric measurements consequent to a 10-week weight training program. Med Sci Sports 6:133–138

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davies, B.N., Greenwood, E.J. & Jones, S.R. Gender difference in the relationship of performance in the handgrip and standing long jump tests to lean limb volume in young adults. Europ. J. Appl. Physiol. 58, 315–320 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417269

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417269

Key words

Navigation