Skip to main content

The number line as a teaching aid

Abstract

The number line is often recommended as an aid for the teaching of whole number addition and subtraction. The possible stages in young children's use of the aid are described, as is their ultimate outgrowing of this aid.

Number line diagrams are also used in diagnostic and achievement test items to assess the understanding of whole number addition. This practice is discussed and criticised with the aid of the empirical findings of the second NAEP. Finally the wider role of number line diagrams in mathematics teaching is outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Assessment of Performance Unit: 1980, 1981, 1982, Mathematical Development: Primary Survey Reports No. 1, 2, 3, Secondary Survey Reports No. 1, 2, 3, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, M. E.: 1973, Number in Elementary Mathematics, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billstein, R., Libeskind, S., and Lott, J. W.: 1984, A Problem Solving Approach to Mathematics for Elementary School Teachers, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board of Education for the Borough of North York: undated, Guidelines for Developing a Mathematics Programme K-6, The Board of Education for the Borough of North York, Toronto, Ontario.

  • Carpenter, T. P. et al.: 1981, Results from the Second Mathematics Assessment of the National Assessment of Academic Progress, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, K. and Katterns, B.: 1984, Mathematics in School, 13(4), 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, P.: 1983, Mathematical Education for Teaching, 4(2) 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essex Education Committee: undated, The Impact of Modern Mathematics on Primary Schools, Essex County Council, Essex.

  • Georgia Department of Education: 1971, Mathematics for Georgia Schools, Volume 1: Primary Grades, Georgia Department of Education, Atlanta, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K. M. (ed.): 1981, Children's Understanding of Mathematics: 11–16, John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heddens, J. W.: 1971, Today's Mathematics: A Guide to Concepts and Methods in Elementary School Mathematics, Science Research Associates, Palo Alto, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebeck, P.: 1984, How Children Learn Mathematics, Penguin, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, J. L., Purdy, C. R., and Kinney, L. B.: 1970, Teaching Elementary School Mathematics for Understanding, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, D. D., Thiessen, D., and Wild, M.: 1982, Elementary Mathematical Methods, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, F. K.: 1982, A Guide to the Diagnostic Teaching of Arithmetic, Charles E. Merrill, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B. and Ford, W. B.: 1981, The Psychology of Mathematics for Instruction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedesel, C. A. and Burns, P. C.: 1977, Handbook for Exploratory and Systematic Teaching of Elementary School Mathematics, Harper and Row, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, P. L. and Brydegaard, M.: 1966, Building Mathematical Compentence in the Elementary School, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underhill, B., Uprichard, E. and Heddens, J.: 1982, Diagnosing Mathematical Difficulties, Charles E. Merrill, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ernest, P. The number line as a teaching aid. Educ Stud Math 16, 411–424 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417195

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417195

Keywords

  • Young Child
  • Mathematics Teaching
  • Test Item
  • Empirical Finding
  • Number Line