Skip to main content
Log in

Health risk assessment for toxic emissions from a manufacturing facility

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the risk associated with the release of toxic chemicals from a manufacturing facility, following the State of California's approach to risk assessment. The facility emits five toxic substances from eight stacks. The building downwash is considered during dispersion calculations. The zone of impact, identified using a risk criteria (i.e. excess cancer risk of 10 in a million), is located in the southeast quandrant from the plant. The size of the impact area is 3.3 km2. The cancer and non-cancer effects are considered for chromium (VI), benzene, formaldehyde, gasoline vapors, methylene chloride, and selenium using the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association Guidelines. No significant non-cancer effects are found due to the emissions. The maximum calculated risk is 1.197×10-5 and is an extremely conservative value. Analysis shows that the use of realistic assumptions for exposure duration and unit risk factors during the risk calculations could reduce the zone of impact to 0 km2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auer, A. H., Jr.: 1978, ‘Correlation of Land Use and Cover with Meteorological Anomalies’, J. Applied Meteor. 5, 636–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • CAPCOA: 1993a, ‘Air Toxics Hot Spots Program—Revised Risk Assessment Guideline’, Oct.

  • CAPCOA: 1993b, ‘ACE2588 Upgrade’, Oct. 15.

  • CAPCOA: 1991, ‘Risk Assessment Guidelines’, AB2588 Risk Assessment Committee of the CAPCOA, Jan.

  • CAPCOA, SBCAPCD and Applied Modeling, Inc: 1992, ‘User's Guide to the Assessment of Chemical Exposure for AB2588 (ACE2588) Computer Model’, March.

  • Copeland, T. L., Holbrow, A. M., Otani, J. M., Conner, K. T. and Paustenbach, D. J.: 1994, ‘Use of Probabilistic Methods to Understand the Conservatism in California's Approach to Assessing Health Risks Posed by Air Contaminants’, Air and Waste Manag Assoc. 44, 1399–1413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covello, V. T. and Merkhofer, M. W.: 1993, Risk Assessment Methods: Approaches for Assessing Health and Environmental Risks, Plenum Press, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiksel, J.: 1985, ‘Quantitative Risk Analysis for Toxic Chemicals in the Environment’, J. Hazard. Mater. 10, 227–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassiotis, O., Ziegler, A. and Seigneur, C.: 1993, ‘Uncertainty Analysis of the Air Toxics Cancer Risks Associated with the Emissions from a California Refinery’, personal communication.

  • Kumar, A., Madasu, R. and Manocha, A.: 1994, ‘An Evaluation of SmartRISK and ACE 2588 Health Risk Assessment Software’, Environmen. Prog. 13, N14-N19.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKone, T. E. and Bogen, K. T.: 1991, ‘Predicting the Uncertainties in Risk Assessment’, Environ. Sci. Technol. 25(10), 1674–1681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, A. C. and Francis, M. A.: 1993, Clean Air Act Handbook-A Practical Guide to Compliance, Clark Boardman Callagham.

  • Riswadkar, R. M. and Kumar, A.: 1994, ‘Evaluation of the Industrial Source Complex Short-Term Model in a Large-Scale Multiple Source Region for Different Stability Classes’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 33, 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinity Consultants, ‘BREEZE WAKE/BPIP User Manual, Version 1.00’, Trinity Consultants Inc.

  • USEPA: 1986, ‘Guidelines on Air Quality Models (Revised)’, EPA-450/4-78-027R, RTP, NC27711 (NTIS PB 86-245248).

  • USEPA: 1993, ‘User's Guide for the Industrial Source Complex (ISC2) Dispersion Models’, EPA-450/4-92-008a, March.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Madasu, R. & Manocha, A. Health risk assessment for toxic emissions from a manufacturing facility. Environ Monit Assess 42, 211–228 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414369

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414369

Keywords

Navigation