Skip to main content
Log in

Indication and adaptation

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between a family of concepts involving reliable correlation, and a family of concepts involving adaptation and biological function, as these concepts are used in the naturalistic semantic theory of Dretske's Explaining Behavior. I argue that Dretske's attempt to marry correlation and function to produce representation fails, though aspects of his failure point the way forward to a better theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, D. M.: 1973, Belief, Truth, and Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow J. and R. Pargetter: 1987, ‘Functions’, Journal of Philosophy 84, 181–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorse, C.: 1976, ‘Wright on Functions’, reprinted in Sober 1984, pp. 369–85.

  • Burian, R. M.: 1983, ‘Adaptation’, in M. Grene (ed.), Dimensions of Darwinism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 280–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R.: 1975, ‘Functional Analysis’, Journal of Philosophy 72, 741–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R.: 1989, Meaning and Mental Representation, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1982, The Extended Phenotype, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1986, The Blind Watchmaker, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.: 1987, ‘Evolution, Error, and Intentionality’, in The Intentional Stance, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 287–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F.: 1972, ‘Contrastive Statements’, Philosophical Review 81, 411–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F.: 1981, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F.: 1983, ‘The Epistemology of Belief’, Synthese 55, 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F.: 1986, ‘Misrepresentation’, in R. Bogdan (ed.), Belief: Form, Content, and Function, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F.: 1988, Explaining Behavior, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H.: 1990, ‘Narrow Aspects of Intentionality and the Information-Theoretic Approach to Content’, in E. Villaneuva (ed.), Information, Semantics and Epistemology, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 102–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A.: 1984, ‘Semantics, Wisconsin Style’, Synthese 59, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A.: 1987, Psychosemantics, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, P.: 1989, ‘Misinformation’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19, 533–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A.: 1976, ‘Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge’, Journal of Philosophy 73, 771–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J.: 1982, ‘Darwinism and the Expansion of Evolutionary Theory’, Science 216, 380–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. and R. C. Lewontin: 1979, ‘The Spandrells of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Program’, reprinted in Sober 1984, pp. 252–70.

  • Kitcher, P. S.: 1985, Vaulting Ambition; Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature, MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D.: 1987, ‘Mental Representation from the Bottom Up’, Synthese 70, 23–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R. G.: 1984, Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan R. G.: 1989, ‘Biosemantics’, Journal of Philosophy 86, 281–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan R. G.: 1990, ‘Truth Rules, Hoverflies, and the Kripke-Wittgenstein Paradox’, Philosophical Review 94, 323–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, C. K. and I. A. Richards: 1956, The Meaning of Meaning, 8th edn., Harcourt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papineau, D.: 1987, Reality and Representation, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1975, ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”’, in K. Gunderson (ed.), Language Mind, and Knowledge. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 131–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (ed.): 1984, Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology; an Anthology, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R.: 1984, Inquiry, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stampe, D.: 1977, ‘Towards a Causal Theory of Linguistic Representation’, in P. French, F. Uehling and H. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. II, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 81–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stampe, D.: 1986, ‘Verificationism and a Causal Account of Meaning’, Synthese 69, 113–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, S.: 1985, ‘Could Man be an Irrational Animal? Some Notes on the Epistemology of Rationality’, Synthese 71, 97–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, S.: 1990, The Fragmentation of Reason, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, K.: 1987, ‘Belief, Information, and Semantic Content: a Naturalist's Lament’, Synthese 71: 97–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L.: 1973, ‘Functions’, reprinted in Sober 1984, pp. 347–68.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Godfrey-Smith, P. Indication and adaptation. Synthese 92, 283–312 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414302

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414302

Keywords

Navigation