Abstract
Elementary results concerning the connections between deductive relations and probabilistic support are given. These are used to show that Popper-Miller's result is a special case of a more general result, and that their result is not “very unexpected” as claimed. According to Popper-Miller, a purely inductively supports b only if they are “deductively independent” — but this means that ⌝ a ⊢ b. Hence, it is argued that viewing induction as occurring only in the absence of deductive relations, as Popper-Miller sometimes do, is untenable. Finally, it is shown that Popper-Miller's claim that deductive relations determine probabilistic support is untrue. In general, probabilistic support can vary greatly with fixed deductive relations as determined by the relevant Lindenbaum algebra.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Cussens, J.: 1991, Interpretations of Probability, Nonstandard Analysis and Confirmation Theory, PhD Thesis, King's College, London.
Eells, E.: 1988, ‘On the Alleged Impossibility of Inductive Probability’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39, 111–16.
Howson, C.: 1973, ‘Must the Logical Probability of Laws be Zero?’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24, 153–82.
Jeffrey, R. C.: 1984, ‘The Impossibility of Inductive Probability’, Nature 310, 434.
Mura, A.: 1990, ‘When Probabilistic Support is Inductive’, Philosophy of Science 57, 278–89.
Popper, K. R. and Miller, D.: 1983, ‘A Proof of the Impossibility of Inductive Probability’, Nature 302, 687–88.
Popper, K. R. and Miller, D.: 1987, ‘Why Probabilistic Support is not Inductive’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A 321, 569–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cussens, J. Deduction, induction and probabilistic support. Synthese 108, 1–10 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414003
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414003
Keywords
- General Result
- Elementary Result
- Probabilistic Support
- Deductive Relation