Abstract
I defend the projection postulate against two of Margenau's criticisms. One involves two types of nonideal measurements, measurements that “disturb” and measurements that “annihilate”. Such measurements cannot be characterized using the original version of the projection postulate. This is one of the most interesting and powerful objections to the projection postulate since most realistic measurements are nonideal, in Margenau's sense. I show that a straightforward generalization of the projection postulate is capable of handling the more realistic kinds of measurements considered by Margenau. His other objection involves the EPR (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen) situation. He suggests that there is a significant potential for violations of the no-superluminalsignals requirement of the special theory of relativity, if projections occur in this situation and others like it. He also suggests that what is paradoxical about this situation disappears if the projection postulate is rejected. I show that it is not possible to use measurements on pairs of spatially-separated systems whose states are entangled to transmit information superluminally, and generalize this result to include nonideal measurements. I also show that EPR's dilemma does not really depend on the projection postulate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allcock, G. R.: 1969, ‘The Time of Arrival in Quantum Mechanics: I. Formal Considerations’, Annals of Physics 53, 253–85.
Bell, J.: 1964, ‘On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox’, Physics 1, 195–200.
Bilaniuk, O. M. P. and Sudarshan, E. C. G.: 1969, ‘Particles Beyond the Light Barrier’, Physics Today 5, 43–51.
Bohm, D.: 1951, Quantum Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Cartwright, N.: 1983, ‘How the Measurement Problem is an Artefact of the Mathematics’, in N. Cartwright, How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford, New York, pp. 163–216.
Cohen-Tannoudji, C., Diu, B., and Laloë, F.: 1977, Quantum Mechanics, Wiley-Interscience, New York.
D'Espagnat, B.: 1989, Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, New York.
De Muynck, W. M.: 1986, ‘On the Relation Between the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox and the Problem of Nonlocality in Quantum Mechanics’, Foundations of Physics 16, 973–1002.
Eberhard, P. H.: 1978, ‘Bell's Theorem and the Different Concepts of Locality’, Il Nuovo Cimento 46B, 392–419.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N.: 1935, ‘Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?’, Physical Review 47, 777–80.
Fine, A.: 1982, ‘Some Local Models for Correlation Experiments’, Synthese 50, 279–94.
Fine, A.: 1991, ‘Inequalities for Nonideal Correlation Experiments’, Foundations of Physics 21, 365–78.
Ghirardi, G. C., Grassi, R., Rimini, A., and Weber, T.: 1988, ‘Experiments of the EPR Type Involving CP-Violation Do not Allow Faster-than-Light Communication between Distant Observers’, Europhysics Letters 6, 95–100.
Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., and Weber, T.: 1980, ‘A General Argument against Superluminal Transmission through the Quantum Mechanical Measurement Process’, Lettere al Nuovo Cimento 27, 293–98.
Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., and Weber, T.: 1986, ‘Unified Dynamics for Microscopic and Macroscopic Systems’, Physical Review D34, 470–91.
Gottfried, K.: 1979, Quantum Mechanics, Benjamin/Cummings, London.
Hall, M. J. W.: 1987, ‘Imprecise Measurements and Non-Locality in Quantum Mechanics’, Physics Letters A125, 89–91.
Jarrett, J. P.: 1984, ‘On the Physical Significance of the Locality Conditions in the Bell Arguments’, Noûs 18, 569–89.
Kidd, R., Ardini, J., and Anton, A.: 1989, ‘Evolution of the Modern Photon’, American Journal of Physics 57, 27–35.
Kochen, S., and Specker, E. P.: 1967, ‘The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics’, in C. A. Hooker (ed.), The Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.
Kronz, F. M.: 1990, ‘Hidden Locality, Conspiracy and Superluminal Signals’, Philosophy of Science 57, 420–44.
Kronz, F. M.: forthcoming, ‘The Projection Postulate and the Time-Energy Uncertainty Relation’, Philosophy of Science 59 (1992).
Loudon, R.: 1973, The Quantum Theory of Light, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Margenau, H.: 1936, ‘Quantum-Mechanical Description’, Physical Review 49, 240–42.
Margenau, H.: 1937, ‘Critical Points in Modern Physical Theory’, Philosophy of Science 4, 337–70.
Margenau, H.: 1950, The Nature of Physical Reality, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Margenau, H.: 1958, ‘Philosophical Problems Concerning the Meaning of Measurement in Physics’, Philosophy of Science 25, 23–33.
Margenau, H.: 1963, ‘Measurements and Quantum States: Part I’, Philosophy of Science 30, 1–16.
Power, E. A.: 1965, Introductory Quantum Electrodynamics, American Elsevier Publishing Company, New York.
Redhead, M.: 1983, ‘Nonlocality and Peaceful Coexistence’, in R. Swinburne (ed.), Space, Time and Causality, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.
Scully, M. O., and Sargent, M.: 1972, ‘The Concept of the Photon’, Physics Today, 25, 38–47.
Shimony, A.: 1983, ‘Controllable and Uncontrollable Non-locality’, in S. Kamefuchi et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of the New Technology, Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo.
Stairs, A.: 1983, ‘Quantum Logic, Realism, and Value Definiteness’, Philosophy of Science 50, 578–602.
Teller, P.: 1983, ‘The Projection Postulate as a Fortuitous Approximation’, Philosophy of Science 50, 413–31.
Tolman, R. C.: 1917, The Theory of Relativity of Motion, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Van Fraassen, B.: 1974, ‘The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox’, Synthese 29, 291–309.
Wooters, W. K.: 1980, ‘The Acquisition of Information from Quantum Measurements’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I would like to thank three anonymous referees, two from Synthese and one from Foundations of Physics, for their critical comments on preliminary versions of this essay, and for bringing to my attention several articles concerning quantum mechanics and the impossibility of faster-than-light communication.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kronz, F.M. Quantum entanglement and nonideal measurements: A critique of Margenau's objections to the projection postulate. Synthese 89, 229–251 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413906
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413906