Skip to main content

Evolution, rationality, and testability

Abstract

Cosmides, Wason, and Johnson-Laird, among others, have suggested evidence that reasoning abilities tend to be domain specific, insofar as humans do not appear to acquire capacities for logical reasoning that are applicable across different contexts. Unfortunately, the significance of these findings depends upon the specific variety of ‘logical reasoning’ under consideration. Indeed, there seem to be at least three grounds for doubting such conclusions, since: (1) tests of reasoning involving the use of material conditionals may not be appropriate for representing ordinary thinking, especially when it concerns causal processes involving the use of causal conditionals instead; (2) tests of domain specificity may fail to acknowledge the crucial role fulfilled by rules of inference, such as modus ponens and modus tollens, which appear to be completely general across different contexts; and, (3) tests that focus exclusively upon deductive reasoning may misinterpret findings involving the use of inductive reasoning, which is of primary importance for human evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Cosmides, L.: 1985, Deduction or Darwinian Algorithms? An Explanation of the “Elusive” Content Effect on the Wason Selection Task, Harvard University Ph.D. Dissertation, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H.: 1981, Scientific Knowledge, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G.: 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. C.: 1967, The Foundations of Scientific Inference, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P. C.: 1966, ‘Reasoning’, in B. M. Foss, (ed.), New Horizons in Psychology, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, United Kingdom, pp. 135–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P. C.: 1983, ‘Realism and Rationality in the Selection Task’, in J. St. B. Evans, (ed.), Thinking and Reasoning: Psychological Approaches. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 44–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P. C. and P. N. Johnson-Laird: 1972, The Psychology of Reasoning, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fetzer, J.H. Evolution, rationality, and testability. Synthese 82, 423–439 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413884

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413884

Keywords

  • Crucial Role
  • Human Evolution
  • Specific Variety
  • Domain Specificity
  • Logical Reasoning