Abstract
Several accounts of logical truth are compared and shown to define distinct concepts. Nevertheless, conditions are given under which they happen to declare exactly the same sentences logically true. These conditions involve the variety of objects in the domain, the richness of the language, and the logical resources available. It is argued that the class of sentences declared logically true by each of the accounts depends on particularities of the actual world.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almog, J.: 1989, ‘Logic and the World’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 18, 197–220.
Bolzano, B.: 1837, Theory of Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Cartwright, R.: 1987, ‘Implications and Entailments’, in Philosophical Essays, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Etchemendy, J.: 1990, The Concept of Logical Consequence, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Frege, G.: 1884, The Foundations of Arithmetic, Blackwell, Oxford.
Hodges, W.: 1986, ‘Truth in a Structure’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 1985–86, 135–151.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1954, ‘Carnap and Logical Truth’, in P. A. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Open Court, La Salle, IL, pp. 385–486.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1970, Philosophy of Logic, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Russell, B.: 1919, Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, George Allen and Unwin, London.
Russell, B.: 1961, Our Knowledge of the External World, George Allen and Unwin, London.
Tarski, A.: 1936, ‘On the Concept of Logical Consequence’, in Tarski, Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Tarski, A.: 1986, ‘What are Logical Notions?’, in John Corcoran (ed.), History and Philosophy of Logic 7.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1961, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd., London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hammer, E.M. The truths of logic. Synthese 109, 27–45 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413821
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413821