Abstract
The distinction between explanation and prediction has received much attention in recent literature, but the equally important distinction between explanation and description (or between prediction and description) remains blurred. This latter distinction is particularly important in the social sciences, where probabilistic models (or theories) often play dual roles as explanatory and descriptive devices. The distinction between explanation (or prediction) and description is explicated in the present paper in terms of information theory. The explanatory (or predictive) power of a probabilistic model is identified with information taken from (or transmitted by) the environment (e.g., the independent, experimentally manipulated variables), while the descriptive power of a model reflects additional information taken from (or transmitted by) the data. Although information is usually transmitted by the data in the process of estimating parameters, it turns out that the number of free parameters is not a reliable index of transmitted information. Thus, the common practice of treating parameters as ‘degrees-of-freedom’ in testing probabilistic models is questionable. Finally, this information-theoretic analysis of explanation, prediction, and description suggests ways of resolving some recent controversies surrounding the pragmatic aspects of explanation and the so-called structural identity thesis.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Bibliography
Bush, R. R., Galanter, E., and Luce, D. R.: 1963, ‘Characterization and Classification of Choice Experiments’, in Handbook of Mathematical Psychology (ed. by R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter), Vol. I, Wiley, New York, pp. 77–102.
Dray, W.: 1957, Laws and Explanation in History, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hanna, J. F.: 1966, ‘A New Approach to the Formulation and Testing of Learning Models’, Synthese 16, 344–80.
Hanna, J.F.: 1968, ‘An Explication of “Explication”’, Philosophy of Science 35, 28–44.
Hanna, J. F.: 1969, ‘Some Information Measures for Testing Stochastic Models’, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 6, 294–311.
Hempel, C. G.: 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, The Free Press, New York.
Hempel, C. G. and Oppenheim, P.: 1948, ‘Studies in the Logic of Explanation’, Philosophy of Science 15, 135–75. Also in Aspects of Scientific Explanation, pp. 245–95.
Kullback, S.: 1959, Information Theory and Statistics, Wiley, New York.
Popper, K. R.: 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London.
Scheffler, I.: 1963, The Anatomy of Inquiry, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
Scriven, M.: 1959, ‘Explanation and Prediction in Evolutionary Theory’, Science 130, 447–82.
Scriven, M.: 1962, ‘Explanations, Predictions, and Laws’, in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (ed. by H. Feigl and G. Maxwell), Vol. III, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Shanon, C. E. and Weaver, W.: 1949, The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NSF Grant GS-1448.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hanna, J.F. Explanation, prediction, description, and information theory. Synthese 20, 308–334 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413732
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413732
Keywords
- Estimate Parameter
- Social Science
- Information Theory
- Free Parameter
- Probabilistic Model