Conclusions
The work of Gleason and of Kochen and Specker has been thought to refute a naïve realist approach to quantum mechanics. The argument of this paper substantially bears out this conclusion. The assumptions required by their work are not arbitrary, but have sound theoretical justification. Moreover, if they are false, there seems no reason why their falsity should not be demonstrable in some sufficiently ingenious experiment. Suitably interpreted, the work of Bell and Wigner may be seen to yield independent arguments for the falsity of naïve realistic approach to quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics is no more like classical statistical mechanics than its creators thought it was.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Audi, M.: 1973, The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
Ballentine, L. E.: 1970, ‘The Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, Reviews of Modern Physics 42, 358–381.
Belinfante, F. J.: 1973, A Survey of Hidden Variables Theories, Pergamon Press, Oxford and New York.
Bell, J. S.: 1964, ‘On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox’, Physics 1, 195–200.
Cartwright, N.: 1977, ‘The Sum Rule Has Not Been Tested’, Philosophy of Science 44, 107–112.
Einstein, A.: 1949, ‘Reply to Criticisms’, Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, ed. P. A. Schilpp, Open Court, Illinois, pp. 665–688.
Fine, A.: 1973, ‘Probability and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24, 1–37.
Fine, A.: 1973a, ‘The Two Problems of Quantum Measurement’, Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IV, eds. P. Suppes, L. Henkin, A. Joja, G. C. Moisil, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 567–581.
Fine, A.: 1976, ‘On the Completeness of Quantum Theory’, Logic and Probability in Quantum Mechanics, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 249–281.
Fine, A.: 1977, ‘Conservation, the Sum Rule, and Confirmation’, Philosophy of Science 44, 95–106.
Gardner, M. R.: 1972, ‘Quantum-Theoretical Realism: Popper and Einstein v. Kochen and Specker’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23, 13–23.
Gleason, A. M.: 1957, ‘Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space’, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 6, 885–893.
Glymour, C.: 1971, ‘Determinism, Ignorance and Quantum Mechanics’ The Journal of Philosophy 68, 744–751.
Glymour, C.: 1976, Review of J. Bub, The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6, 161–175.
Glymour, C.: 1977, ‘The Sum Rule is Well-Confirmed’, Philosophy of Science 44, 86–94.
Kochen, S. and Specker, E. P.: 1967, ‘The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics’, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17, 59–81.
Popper, K. R.: 1967, ‘Quantum Mechanics Without “The Observer”’, Quantum Theory and Reality, ed. M. Bunge, Springer, Berlin.
Shimony, A.: 1973, ‘The Status of Hidden Variable Theories’, Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IV, eds. P. Suppes, L. Henkin, A. Joja, G. C. Moisil, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 593–601.
Suppes, P.: 1969, ‘The Role of Probability in Quantum Mechanics’, Studies in the Methodology and Foundations of Science, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 227–242.
van Fraassen, B.: 1973, ‘Semantic Analysis of Quantum Logic’, in C. A. Hooker (ed.), Contemporary Research in the Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Theory, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 80–113.
von Neumann, J.: 1955, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, trans. R. T. Beyer, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J.
Wigner, E.: 1970, ‘On Hidden Variables and Quantum Mechanical Probabilities’, American Journal of Physics 38, 1005–1009.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Many of the ideas in this paper have been distilled from a Ph.D. thesis presented to the Harvard Philosophy Department in December 1977. I wish to thank Michael Friedman and Hilary Putnam for helpful discussions and constructive criticism of my work; Arthur Fine for stimulating my interest in this topic by his writings; and the Thyssen Foundation for support of research.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Healey, R. Quantum realism: Naïveté is no excuse. Synthese 42, 121–144 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413708
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413708
Keywords
- Quantum Mechanic
- Statistical Mechanic
- Realist Approach
- Theoretical Justification
- Classical Statistical Mechanic