References
Alchourrón, C. E. and E. Bulygin: 1981, ‘The Expressive Conception of Norms’, in Hilpinen, pp. 95–124.
Alchourrón, C. E. and E. Bulygin: 1983, ‘Deontic Truth and Values’, in U. Kangas (ed.), Essays in Legal Theory in Honor of Kaarle Makkonen, Oikeustiede Jurisprudentia XVI, Helsinki, pp. 19–35.
Belzer, M.: 1983, ‘The Ideal “Ought” and the All-out “Ought”’, forthcoming.
Bonevac, D.: 1983, ‘Chellas on Conditional Obligation’, Philosophical Studies 44, 247–255.
Carnap, R.: 1960, The Logical Foundations of Probability, 2nd ed., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Chellas, B. F.: 1974, ‘Conditional Obligation’, in Stenlund, pp. 23–33.
Chellas, B. F.: 1980, Modal Logic: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Decew, J. W.: 1981, ‘Conditional Obligation and Counterfactuals’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 55–72.
Domotor, Z.: 1969, Probabiļistic Relational Structures and Their Applications, Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Technical Report No. 144, Stanford University, Stanford.
de Finetti, B.: 1964, ‘Foresight: Its Logical Laws, Its Subjective Sources’, in H. E. Kyburg, Jr. and H. Smokler (eds.). Studies in Subjective Probability, John Wiley, New York, pp. 93–158.
Greenspan, P. S.: 1975, ‘Conditional Oughts and Hypothetical Imperatives’, Journal of Philosophy 72, 259–276.
Harper, W. L. and C. A. Hooker (eds.): 1976, Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Sciences, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Harper, W. L., R. Stalnaker and G. Pearce (eds.): 1981, Ifs, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Hilpinen, R. (ed.): 1971, Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Hilpinen, R. (ed.): 1981, New Studies in Deontic Logic: Norms, Actions, and the Foundations of Ethics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Hintikka, J.: 1971, ‘Some Main Problems of Deontic Logic’, in Hilpinen, pp. 59–104.
Knuuttila, S.: 1982, ‘Topics in Late Medieval Intensional Logic’, in I. Niiniluoto and E. Saarinen (eds.), Intensional Logic: Theory and Applications, Acta Philosophica Fennica 35, 26–41.
Levi, I.: 1980, The Enterprise of Knowledge, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Lewis, D.: 1973, Counterfactuals, Blackwell, Oxford.
Lewis, D.: 1974, ‘Semantic Analyses for Dyadic Deontic Logic’, in Stenlund, pp. 1–14.
Lewis, D.: 1976, ‘Probabilities of Conditionals and Conditional Probabilities’, Philosophical Review 85, 297–315.
Lewis, D.: 1979, ‘A Problem About Permission’, in E. Saarinen et al. (eds.), Essays in Honour of Jaakko Hintikka, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 163–175.
Loewer, B. and M. Belzer: 1983, ‘Dyadic Deontic Detachment’, Synthese 54, 295–318.
Mott, P. L.: 1973, ‘On Chisholm's Paradox’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 2, 197–211.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1985, ‘Truth and Legal Norms’, forthcoming in the Proceedings of the IVR Congress, Helsinki, August 14–20, 1983.
Rescher, N.: 1968, Topics in Philosophical Logic, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Ross, A.: 1968, Directives and Norms, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Sellars, W.: 1983, ‘Conditional Promises and Conditional Intentions (Including a Reply to Castañeda)’, in J. E. Tomberlin (ed.), Agent, Lauguage, and the Structure of the World, Hackett, Indianapolis, pp. 195–221.
Stenius, E.: 1982, ‘Ross’ Paradox and Well-formed Codices', Theoria 48, 49–77.
Stenlund, S. (ed.): 1974, Logical Theory and Semantic Analysis: Essays Dedicated to Stig Kanger on His Fiftieth Birthday, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Suppes, P.: 1966, ‘Probabilistic Inference and the Concept of Total Evidence’, in J. Hintikka and P. Suppes (eds.), Aspects of Inductive Logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 49–65.
Weirich, P.; 1983, ‘Conditional Probabilities and Probabilities Given Knowledge of a Condition’, Philosophy of Science 50, 82–95.
von Wright, G. H.: 1963, Norm and Action, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
von Wright, G. H.: 1969, ‘On the Logic and Ontology of Norms’, in J. W. Davis et al. (eds.), Philosophical Logic, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 89–107.
von Wright, G. H.: 1981, ‘On the Logic of Norms and Actions’, in Hilpinen, pp. 3–35.
von Wright, G. H.: 1983, ‘Norm, Truth, and Logic’, in Practical Reason, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 130–209.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niiniluoto, I. Hypothetical imperatives and conditional obligations. Synthese 66, 111–133 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413583
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413583