Skip to main content
Log in

Hypothetical imperatives and conditional obligations

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Alchourrón, C. E. and E. Bulygin: 1981, ‘The Expressive Conception of Norms’, in Hilpinen, pp. 95–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchourrón, C. E. and E. Bulygin: 1983, ‘Deontic Truth and Values’, in U. Kangas (ed.), Essays in Legal Theory in Honor of Kaarle Makkonen, Oikeustiede Jurisprudentia XVI, Helsinki, pp. 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belzer, M.: 1983, ‘The Ideal “Ought” and the All-out “Ought”’, forthcoming.

  • Bonevac, D.: 1983, ‘Chellas on Conditional Obligation’, Philosophical Studies 44, 247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1960, The Logical Foundations of Probability, 2nd ed., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chellas, B. F.: 1974, ‘Conditional Obligation’, in Stenlund, pp. 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chellas, B. F.: 1980, Modal Logic: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decew, J. W.: 1981, ‘Conditional Obligation and Counterfactuals’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domotor, Z.: 1969, Probabiļistic Relational Structures and Their Applications, Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Technical Report No. 144, Stanford University, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B.: 1964, ‘Foresight: Its Logical Laws, Its Subjective Sources’, in H. E. Kyburg, Jr. and H. Smokler (eds.). Studies in Subjective Probability, John Wiley, New York, pp. 93–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan, P. S.: 1975, ‘Conditional Oughts and Hypothetical Imperatives’, Journal of Philosophy 72, 259–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, W. L. and C. A. Hooker (eds.): 1976, Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Sciences, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, W. L., R. Stalnaker and G. Pearce (eds.): 1981, Ifs, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilpinen, R. (ed.): 1971, Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilpinen, R. (ed.): 1981, New Studies in Deontic Logic: Norms, Actions, and the Foundations of Ethics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1971, ‘Some Main Problems of Deontic Logic’, in Hilpinen, pp. 59–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuuttila, S.: 1982, ‘Topics in Late Medieval Intensional Logic’, in I. Niiniluoto and E. Saarinen (eds.), Intensional Logic: Theory and Applications, Acta Philosophica Fennica 35, 26–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, I.: 1980, The Enterprise of Knowledge, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1973, Counterfactuals, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1974, ‘Semantic Analyses for Dyadic Deontic Logic’, in Stenlund, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1976, ‘Probabilities of Conditionals and Conditional Probabilities’, Philosophical Review 85, 297–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1979, ‘A Problem About Permission’, in E. Saarinen et al. (eds.), Essays in Honour of Jaakko Hintikka, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 163–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewer, B. and M. Belzer: 1983, ‘Dyadic Deontic Detachment’, Synthese 54, 295–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mott, P. L.: 1973, ‘On Chisholm's Paradox’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 2, 197–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1985, ‘Truth and Legal Norms’, forthcoming in the Proceedings of the IVR Congress, Helsinki, August 14–20, 1983.

  • Rescher, N.: 1968, Topics in Philosophical Logic, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A.: 1968, Directives and Norms, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W.: 1983, ‘Conditional Promises and Conditional Intentions (Including a Reply to Castañeda)’, in J. E. Tomberlin (ed.), Agent, Lauguage, and the Structure of the World, Hackett, Indianapolis, pp. 195–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenius, E.: 1982, ‘Ross’ Paradox and Well-formed Codices', Theoria 48, 49–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenlund, S. (ed.): 1974, Logical Theory and Semantic Analysis: Essays Dedicated to Stig Kanger on His Fiftieth Birthday, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P.: 1966, ‘Probabilistic Inference and the Concept of Total Evidence’, in J. Hintikka and P. Suppes (eds.), Aspects of Inductive Logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weirich, P.; 1983, ‘Conditional Probabilities and Probabilities Given Knowledge of a Condition’, Philosophy of Science 50, 82–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wright, G. H.: 1963, Norm and Action, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wright, G. H.: 1969, ‘On the Logic and Ontology of Norms’, in J. W. Davis et al. (eds.), Philosophical Logic, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 89–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wright, G. H.: 1981, ‘On the Logic of Norms and Actions’, in Hilpinen, pp. 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wright, G. H.: 1983, ‘Norm, Truth, and Logic’, in Practical Reason, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 130–209.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niiniluoto, I. Hypothetical imperatives and conditional obligations. Synthese 66, 111–133 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413583

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413583

Keywords

Navigation