Abstract
In this paper I criticize Toulmin's concept of ‘Ideals of Natural Order’ and his account of the role these ‘Ideals’ play in scientific explanation as given in his book, Foresight and Understanding. I argue that Toulmin's account of ‘Ideals of Natural Order’ as those theories taken to be self evident by scientists at a given time introduces an undesirable subjectivism into his account of scientific explanation. I argue also that the history of science, especially the recent history of microphysics, does not support Toulmin's contentions about the supposed self-evidence of the basic explanatory theories in science.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Orear, Jay, Fundamental Physics, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1961.
Toulmin, Stephen, Foresight and Understanding, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1961.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Purtill, R.L. Toulmin on Ideals of Natural Order. Synthese 22, 431–437 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413437
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413437