Abstract
Duhem's discussion of physical theories as natural classifications is neither antithetical nor incidental to the main thrust of his philosophy of science. Contrary to what is often supposed, Duhem does not argue that theories are better thought of as economically organizing empirical laws than as providing information concerning the nature of the world. What he is primarily concerned with is the character and justification of the scientific method, not the logical status of theoretical entities. The crucial point to notice is that he took the principle of the autonomy of physics to be of paramount importance and he developed the conception of natural classification in opposition to accounts of physical theories that contravened it.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Alexander, P.: 1967, ‘Pierre Duhem’, in P. Edwards (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Macmillan, New York, Vol. 2, pp. 423–5.
Ariew, R.: 1984, ‘The Duhem Thesis’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35, 313–25.
Ariew, R. and P. Barker: 1986, ‘Duhem on Maxwell’, PSA 1986, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 145–56.
de Broglie, L.: 1962, ‘Forward’ to P. Duhem 1914/1962, pp. v–xiii.
Cartwright, N.: 1982, ‘When Explanation Leads to Inference’, Philosophical Topics 13, 111–22.
Duhem, P.: 1893a/1987, ‘Physique et métaphysique’, reprinted in S. L. Jaki (ed.), Pierre Duhem: prémices philosophiques, E. J. Brill, Leiden, pp. 84–112.
Duhem, P.: 1893b/1987, L'école anglaise et les théories physiques’, reprinted in S. L. Jaki (ed.), Pierre Duhem: prémices philosophiques, E. J. Brill, Leiden, pp. 113–46.
Duhem, P.: 1914/1962, La théorie physique: son objet, sa structure, 2nd ed., translated by P. P. Wiener as The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Atheneum, New York.
Duhem, P.: 1917/1987, ‘Notice sur les titres et travaux scientifiques’, translated in part by Y. Murciano and L. Schramm in Science and Context 1, pp. 333–48.
Giedymin, J.: 1976, ‘Instrumentalism and Its Critique: A Reappraisal’, in R. S. Cohen et al. (eds.) Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 179–207.
Jaki, S.: 1984, Uneasy Genius: The Life and Work of Pierre Duhem, Nijhoff, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Joy, G.: 1975, ‘Instrumentalism: A Duhemian Reply to Popper’, Modern Schoolman 52, 194–99.
Martin, R. N. D.: 1976, ‘The Genesis of a Mediaeval Historian’, Annals of Science 33, 119–29.
Martin, R. N. D.: 1987, ‘Saving Duhem and Galileo’, History of Science 25, 301–19.
Poirier, R.: 1967, ‘L'épistemologie de Pierre Duhem et sa valeur actuelle’, Etudes philosophiques 22, 300–419.
Popper, K. R.: 1959, Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London.
Popper, K. R.: 1969, Conjectures and Refutations, 3rd revised edition, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
van Fraassen, B.: 1980, The Scientific Image, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I have benefited from discussions with Howard Duncan concerning Duhem's philosophy, and from Roger Ariew's and Michel Stack's criticisms of an earlier version of the paper. Also I would like to thank Ernan McMullin for his comments at the Blacksburg Conference.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lugg, A. Pierre Duhem's conception of natural classification. Synthese 83, 409–420 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413425
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413425
Keywords
- Scientific Method
- Crucial Point
- Physical Theory
- Logical Status
- Natural Classification