Abstract
I reject the widely held view that Duhem's 1906 book La Théorie physique is a statement of instrumentalistic conventionalism, motivated by the scientific crisis at the end of the nineteenth century. By considering Duhem's historical context I show that his epistemological views were already formed before the crisis occured; that he consistently supported general thermodynamics against the new atomism; and that he rejected the epistemological views of the latter's philosophical supporters. In particular I show that Duhem rejected Poincaré's account of scientific language, Le Roy's view that laws are definitions, and the conventionalist's use of simplicity as the criterion of theory choice. Duhem regarded most theory choices as decidable on empirical grounds, but made historical context the main determining factor in scientific change.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Adhémar, R. de: 1904, La philosophie des sciences et le problème religieux, n.p., Paris.
Duhem, P.: 1892a, ‘Quelques réflexions au sujet des théories physiques’, Revue des Questions scientifiques, 31, 139–77.
Duhem, P.: 1892b, ‘Notation atomiques et hypothèses atomistiques’, Revue des Questions scientifiques 31, 394–457.
Duhem, P.: 1892c, ‘Commentaires aux principes de la thermo-dynamique’, Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 8, 269–330.
Duhem, P.: 1893a, Introduction à La méchanique chimique, George Carré, Paris.
Duhem, P.: 1893b, ‘Physique et Métaphysique’, Revue des Questions scientifiques 34, 54–83.
Duhem, P.: 1893c, ‘L'Ecole anglaise et les théories physiques’, Revue des Questions scientifiques 34, 345–78.
Duhem, P.: 1894a, ‘Quelques réflexions au sujet de la Physique expérimentale’, Revue des Questions scientifiques 36, 179–229.
Duhem, P.: 1894b, ‘Les théories de l'optique’, Revue des Deux Mondes 123, 94–125.
Duhem, P.: 1905, L'Evolution de la Méchanique, Hermann, Paris.
Duhem, P.: 1906, La Théorie Physique, son objet et sa structure, Chevalier et Rivière, Paris. Translated as Duhem 1954.
Duhem, P.: 1908a, ‘SOZEIN TA PHAINOMENA: Essai sur la notion de la théorie physique de Platon à Galilée’, Annales de Philosophie Chrétienne 156, 113–39, 277–302, 352–77, 482–514, 561–92. Republished as Duhem 1908b; translated as Duhem 1969.
Duhem, P.: 1908b, SOZEIN TA PHAINOMENA. Essai sur la notion de la théorie physique de Platon à Galilée, Hermann, Paris.
Duhem, P.: 1913–59, Le système du monde. Histoire des doctrine cosmologiques de Platon à Copernic, Hermann, Paris.
Duhem, P.: 1954, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, P. P. Wiener (trans.), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Duhem, P.: 1969, To Save the Phenomena: An Essay on the Idea of Physical Theory from Plato to Galileo, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Le Roy, E.: 1899, ‘Science et philosophie’, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 7, pp. 375–425; 503–62.
Maiocchi, R.: 1985, Chimica e filosofia, Scienza. epistemologia, storia e religione nell'opera di Pierre Duhem, La Nuova Italia, Firenze.
Poincaré, H.: 1905, La valeur de la science, Flammarion, Paris.
Sainte-Claire Deville, H.: 1866, Leçons sur la dissociation, professées devant la Société Chimique le 18 mars et le 1er avril 1864. Hermann, Paris.
Vicaire, E.: 1893, ‘De la valeur objective des hypothèses physiques’, Annales de la Philosophie Chrétienne 126, p. 79.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maiocchi, R. Pierre Duhem's the aim and structure of physical theory: A book against conventionalism. Synthese 83, 385–400 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413423
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413423
Keywords
- Nineteenth Century
- Determine Factor
- Physical Theory
- Historical Context
- Theory Choice