Skip to main content
Log in

Duhem and the origins of statics: Ramifications of the crisis of 1903–04

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Much speculation on the sources of Duhem's historical interests fails to account for the major shifts in these interests: neither his belief in the continuous development of physics nor his Catholicism, when his Church was encouraging the study of generally Aristotelian scholastic thought, led to any interest in mediaeval science before 1904. Equally, his own claim that he was merely testing his views on the nature of physical theory is easily squared only with earlier work with no trace of mediaeval science. Behind this discontinuity lies a major crisis. Though not a positivist, Duhem had based all his work on assumptions acceptable to positivists. One of these, the sterility of the Middle Ages, was refuted by his chance discovery of evidence of genuine mediaeval science in the autumn of 1903, but that left the doctrine of scholastic sterility intact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agassi, J.: 1963, Towards an Historiography of Science, History and Theory 2, pp. 1–117, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondel, M. and A. Valensin: 1957, Correspondence, Vol. 1, Aubier, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondel, M. and J. Wehrlé: 1969, Correspondance, extraits, Vol. 1, Aubier-Montaigne, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondel, M. (ed.): 1905, ‘Notre Programme’, Annales de Philosophie Chrétienne 151, 5–31.

  • Blondel, M. (Testis): 1909–10, ‘La Semaine Sociale de Bordeaux, controverses sur les méthodes et les doctrines’, Annales de Philosophie Chrétienne, 159, 160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtt, E. A.: 1932, The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Science: A Historical and Critical Essay, International Library of Psychology, Philosophy and Scientific Method, Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bury, J. P. T.: 1976, France, 1840–1940, Methuen, London.

  • Butterfield, H.: 1962, The Origins of Modern Science, G. Bell and Sons Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congregation of the Index: 1948, Index Librorum Prohibitorum.

  • Daly, G.: 1980, Transcendence and Immanence, Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dansette, A.: 1938, Du Boulangisme à la Révolution Dreyfusienne: Le Boulangisme 1886–1890, Librairie Académique Perrin, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P.: 1895, Congrès scientifique international des catholiques, comte rendu du troisième congrès 1, 313–15, 322–25.

  • Duhem, P.: Correspondence with M. Blondel: Duhem Papers, Académie des Sciences, Paris. Blondel Papers, Archives Blondel, Chemin d'Aristote 1, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

  • Duhem, P.: 1905, ‘Physique de Croyant’, Annales de Philosophie Chrétienne 155, 44–67 and 133–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P.: 1906, 1909, 1913, Etudes sur Léonard de Vinci, ceux qu'il a lus et ceux qui l'ont lu, 3 vols., Hermann, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P.: 1903, [analyse de l'Ouvrage de Ernst Mach: La Mécanique, étude historique et critique de son développement], Bulletin des Sciences Mathématiques, 2e serie, 27, 261–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P.: 1900, 1901, Les Théories Électriques de J. Clerk Maxwell, étude historique et critique, Annales de la Société Scientifique de Bruxelles 24, 25.

  • Duhem, P.: 1903, L'Evolution de la Mécanique, A. Joanin, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P.: 1902, Le Mixte et la Combinaison Chimique, essai sur l'Evolution d'une Idée, C. Naud, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P.: 1917, 1927, ‘Notice sur les travaux scientifiques de Pierre Duhem’, Mémoires de la Société des Sciences Physiques et Naturelles de Bordeaux, série 7, 1–2, 71–169.

  • Duhem, P.: 1903–1906, Les Origines de la Statique, Revue des Questions Scientifiques. Published 1905–6, A. Hermann, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P.: 1908, ΣΩZEIN TA ΦAINOMENA, Essai sur la notion de théorie physique, de Platon à Galilée, Annales de Philosophie Chrétienne, Hermann, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P.: 1892, ‘Quelques Réflexions au sujet des théories physiques’, Revue des Questions Scientifiques 31, 139–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P.: 1913–59, Le Système du Monde, histoire des doctrines cosmologiques de Platon à Copernic, A. Hermann et fils, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P.: [1906] 1981, La Théorie Physique, son objet, sa structure, L'Histoire des Sciences, textes et études (3rd ed.), Vrin, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dühring, E.: 1877, Kritische Geschichte der Allgemeinen Principien der Mechanik, Leipzig, Berlin.

  • Favaro, A.: June 1921, ‘Galileo Galilei in una Rassegna del Peniero Italiano nel Corso del Secolo decimosesto’, Archivio di Storio della Scienza 2 137–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, P.: 1949, Modern Science and its Philosophy, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachussetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardeil, A.: 1894, Revue Thomiste, 569–85, 738–59.

  • Gilson, É.: 1955, Christian Philosophy in the Middle Ages, Sheed and Ward, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouhier, H.: 1933–41, La Jeunesse d'Auguste Comte et la formation du positivisme, Paris.

  • ‘Hadamard, Jacques’, Encyclopedia Judaica 7, cols 1040–1.

  • Hadamard, J.: 1917–27, ‘L'Œuvre de Duhem dans son Aspect Mathématique’, Société des Sciences Physiques et Naturelles de Bordeaux, Mémoires, série 7, 1, 637–65.

  • Hadamard, J.: 1937, Archeion 19 123–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadamard, J. and Jacqueline Hadamard: 1945, An Essay on the Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. R.: [1954] 1962, The Scientific Revolution 1500–1800: the Formation of the Modern Scientific Attitude, Longman, Green and Co., Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A.: 1952, The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies in the Abuse of Reason, Glencoe, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hentschel, K.: 1988, ‘Die Korrespondenz Duhem-Mach, zur ‘Modellbeladenheit’ von Wissenschaftsgeschichte’, Annals of Science 45 73–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaki, S. L.: 1984, Uneasy Genius, the Life and Work of Pierre Duhem, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, D.: 1962: The Evolution of Mediaeval Thought, Longman, Green & Co. Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré, A.: 1966, Études Galiléennes, École Pratique des Hautes Études, Collection Histoire de la Pensée 15, Hermann, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.: 1964, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, International Encyclopedia of Unified Science 2/2, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagrange, J. L.: 1788, 1811–15, 1853–55, Méchanique Analitique, Paris.

  • Lakatos, I.: 1971, in ‘History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions’, in R. C. Buck and R. S. Cohen, (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8 173–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecanuet, E.: 1930, La Vie de l'Église sous Léon XIII, Alcan, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leo XIII, Pope: 1887, ‘Aeterni Patris’, Allocutiones, Epistolae, Constitutiones 1.

  • Lowinger, A.: 1941, The Methodology of Pierre Duhem, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mach, E.: 1872, Die Geschichte und die Wurzel des Satzes von der Erhaltung der Arbeit, Prague.

  • Mach, E.: 1904, La Mécanique, Exposé historique et critque de son développement, A. Hermann, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mach, E.: 1883, Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung, historisch-kritisch dargestellt, Leipzig.

  • Maiocchi, R.: 1985, Chimica e Filosofia, Scienza, epistemologia, storia e religione nell'opera di Pierre Duhem, Pubblicazioni della Faccoltà di lettere e filosofia dell' Università di Milano, Sezione a cura del Dipartimento di filosofia, 110/5, La Nuova Italia Editrice, Firenze.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maritain, J.: 1932, Distinguer pour unir, les degrés du savoir, Desclée de Brouwer, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. N. D.: 1982, ‘Darwin and Duhem’, History of Science 20 64–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. N. D.: 1976, ‘The Genesis of a Mediaeval Historian, Pierre Duhem and the Origins of Statics’, Annals of Science 33 119–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCool, G. A.: 1972, Catholic Theology in the Nineteenth Century, the Search for A Unitary Method, Seabury, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. M.: 1971, ‘Duhem, Pierre Maurice Marie’, Dictionary of Scientific Biography 4 225–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, M. J., 1976: ‘The Moral Freedom of Man and the Determinism of Nature: the Catholic Synthesis of Science and History in the Revue des Questions Scientifiques’, British Journal for the History of Science 9 274–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, H. W.: 1979, The Edge of Contingency, French Catholic Reaction to Scientific Change from Darwin to Duhem, University Presses of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, H. W.: July 1972, ‘The Crucifix and the Crucible: Catholic Scientists in the Third Republic’, Catholic Historical Review 58 295–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, H. W., 1969, ‘In Quest of Kerygma: Catholic Intellectual Life in Nineteenth Century France’, American Historical Review 75 387–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, H. W.: 1967, The Second Ralliement, the Rapprochement between Church and State in France in the Twentieth Century, Catholic University of America Press, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre-Duhem, H.: 1936, Un Savant Français, Pierre Duhem, Plon, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pius X, Pope: 1908, ‘Pascendi Dominici Gregis: Encyclical Letter of our most Holy Lord Pius X by Divine Providence Pope on the Doctrines of the Modernists’, Actes de Pius X 3 84–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulat, É.: 1979, Histoire, Dogme et Critique dans la Crise Moderniste, Casterman, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, P. L. and S. Drake: 1971, ‘The Pseudo-Aristotelian Questions of Mechanics in Renaissance Culture’, Studies in the Renaissance 18 65–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, W. M.: 1963, European Positivism in the Nineteenth Century: an Essay in Intellectual History, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannery, P.: Mémoires Scientifiques 14, 207–26.

  • Thibault, P.: 1972, Savoir et Pouvoir, philosophie thomiste et politique cléricale au XIXe siècle, Presses Universitaires de Laval, Québec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicaire, E.: 1893, ‘De la Valeur Objective des Théories Physiques’, Revue des Questions Scientifiques 33 451–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidler, A. R.: 1970, A Variety of Catholic Modernists, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, E., 1962: Action Française: Royalism and Reaction in Twentieth Century France, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westfall, R. S.: 1977, The Construction of Modern Science, Mechanisms and Mechanics, Cambridge History of Science Series (previously Wiley), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Drafted for the Blacksburg conference, versions of this paper were also presented at colloquia at the University of Harvard Department of the History of Science and the University of Toronto Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology. I am grateful to all those who responded to earlier versions, but particularly to Phillip Quinn, the commentator on my paper at Blacksburg, and Jamil Ragep.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, R.N.D. Duhem and the origins of statics: Ramifications of the crisis of 1903–04. Synthese 83, 337–355 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413420

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413420

Keywords

Navigation