Abstract
Marketers must first perceive ethics and social responsibility to be important before their behaviors are likely to become more ethical and reflect greater social responsibility. However, little research has been conducted concerning marketers' perceptions regarding the importance of ethics and social responsibility as components of business decisions. The purpose of this study is to develop a reliable and valid scale for measuring marketers' perceptions regarding the importance of ethics and social responsibility. The authors develop an instrument for the measurement of the perceived role of ethics and social responsibility (PRESOR). Evidence that the scale is valid is presented through the assessment of scale reliability, as well as content and predictive validity. Finally, future research needs and the value of this construct to marketing are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abratt, R. and D. Sacks: 1988, ‘The Marketing Challenge: Towards Being Profitable and Socially Responsible’, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 497–507.
Churchill, G. A.: 1979, ‘A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs’, Journal of Marketing Research 16, 64–73.
Dubinsky, A. J. and B. Loken: 1989, ‘Analyzing Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’, Journal of Business Research 19, 83–107.
Ferber, R.: 1977, ‘Research by Convenience’, Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 57–58.
Ferrell, O. C. and L. G. Gresham: 1985, ‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 49, 87–96.
Ferrell, O. C., L. G. Gresham and J. Fraedrich: 1989, ‘A Synthesis of Ethical Decision Models for Marketing’, Journal of Macro-Marketing 11, 55–64.
Forsyth, D. R.: 1980, ‘A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (1), 175–184.
Frederick, W. C., K. Davis and J. E. Post: 1988, Business and Society: Corporate Strategy, Public Policy, Ethics (6th Ed., Ch. 2) (McGraw-Hill, New York).
Hunt, S. D., P. L. Kiecker and L. B. Chonko: 1990, ‘Social Responsibility and Personal Success: A Research Note’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18, 239–244.
Hunt, S. D. and S. J. Vitell: 1986, ‘A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’, Journal of Macromarketing 8, 5–16.
Hunt, S. D. and S. J. Vitell: 1993, ‘The General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Retrospective and Revision’, in N. C. Smith and J. A. Quelch (eds.), Ethics in Marketing (Irwin Inc., Homewood, IL).
Hunt, S. D. and A. Z. Vasquez-Parrage: 1993, ‘Organizational Consequences, Marketing Ethics, and Salesforce Supervision’, Journal of Marketing Research 30, 78–90.
Kraft, K. L.: 1990, ‘The Relative Importance of Social Responsibility in Determining Organizational Effectiveness: Student Responses’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 179–188.
Kraft, K.L.: 1991, ‘The Relative Importance of Social Responsibility in Determining Organizational Effectiveness: Managers from Two Service Industries’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 485–491.
Kraft, K. L. and J. Hage: 1989, ‘Strategy, Social Responsibility and Implementation’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 11–19.
Kraft, K. L. and L. R. Jauch: 1992, ‘The Organizational Effectiveness Menu: A Device for Stakeholder Assessment’, MidAmerican Journal of Business 7(1), 18–23.
Luthans, F., R. M. Hodgetts and K. R. Thompson: 1984, Social Issues in Business, 4th ed. (Macmillan, New York, NY).
Mayo, M. A. and L. J. Marks: 1990, ‘An Empirical Investigation of a General Theory of Marketing Ethics’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18, 163–171.
Messick, S.: 1975, ‘The Standard Problem: Meaning and Values in Measurement and Education’, American Psychologist (Oct.), 955–966.
Nunnally, J. C.: 1978, Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York).
Peter, J. P.: 1981, ‘Construct Validity: A Review of Basic Issues and Marketing Practices’, Journal of Marketing Research 18, 133–145.
Quinn, R. E. and J. Rohrbaugh: 1983, ‘A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis’, Management Science 29(3), 363–377.
Reidenbach, R. E. and D. P. Robin: 1990, ‘A Partial Testing of the Contingency Framework For Ethical Decision Making: A Path Analytical Approach’, in Louis M. Capella et al. (eds.), Progress in Marketing Thought (Southern Marketing Association, Mississippi State, MS), pp. 121–128.
Robin, D. P. and R. E. Reidenbach: 1987, ‘Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Marketing Strategy: Closing the Gaps Between Concept and Applications’, Journal of Marketing 51, 44–58.
Singhapakdi, A. and S. J. Vitell: 1990, ‘Marketing Ethics: Factors Influencing Perceptions of Ethical Problems and Alternatives’, Journal of Macromarketing 12, 4–18.
Singhapakdi, A. and S. J. Vitell: 1991, ‘Research Note: Selected Background Factors Influencing Marketers' Deontological Norms’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 19, 27–42.
Venkatraman, N. and J. W. Grant: 1986, ‘Construct Measurement in Organizational Strategy Research: A Critique and Proposal’, Academy of Management Review (Jan.), 71–87.
Vitell, S. J. and S. D. Hunt: 1990, ‘The General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Partial Test of the Model’, in N. Sheth (ed.), Research in Marketing, Vol. 10 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 237–265.
Zahra, S. A. and M. S. LaTour: 1987, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Effectiveness: A Multivariate Approach’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 459–467.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Anusorn Singhapakdi is Associate Professor of Marketing at Old Dominion University. He received his Ph.D. in Marketing. His has published in the Journal of Macromarketing, the Journal of Business Ethics, the Business and Professional Ethics Journal, the Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, the Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management and the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. He has presented papers at various professional conferences including the American Marketing Association and the Academy of Marketing Science.
Scott J. Vitell is Associate Professor of Marketing and holder of the Phil B. Hardin Chair of Marketing at the University of Mississippi. He received his Ph.D. in Marketing. His work has previously appeared in the Journal of Macromarketing, the Journal of Business Ethics, Research in Marketing, the Business and Professional Ethics Journal and the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science as well as various other journals and proceedings.
Kumar C. Rallapalli is Assistant Professor of Marketing at Troy State University. His research has been published in the Journal of Business Ethics, the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science and the Journal of Pharmaceutical Marketing and Management as well as various national and regional proceedings. His research interests include marketing ethics, health care marketing, international marketing and direct marketing.
Kenneth L. Kraft is Director of Graduate Studies at the University of Tampa. He received his DBA in Management. He has published numerous articles on Business Ethics, Organization Design and Strategic Planning in Journals such as the Academy of Management Review, America Business Review and the Journal of Business Ethics. His current research interest centers on the measurement of moral intensity.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S.J., Rallapalli, K.C. et al. The perceived role of ethics and social responsibility: A scale development. J Bus Ethics 15, 1131–1140 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00412812
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00412812